'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind
9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?
What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We
have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.
To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we
invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?
Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John
No, they were serving their country and made the ultimate sacrifice.
Bert deserves whatever he gets for his considerable stupidity. He
"brags" about two things in his life: his peacetime, stateside service
in the reserves and his "huge" salary.



I seem to recall you bragging about your compensation as a senior
executive in 1976 earning $205,000/year (2005 USD's).
No brag. I responded to a question. I never thought it was that much then,
and I don't think it was that much now. I knew plenty of guys in the ad
biz in DC back then who were making far more.

I thought you never talked about your earnings Harry.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 18:18:02 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind
9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?
What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We
have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.
To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we
invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?
Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John
No, they were serving their country and made the ultimate sacrifice.
Bert deserves whatever he gets for his considerable stupidity. He
"brags" about two things in his life: his peacetime, stateside service
in the reserves and his "huge" salary.



I seem to recall you bragging about your compensation as a senior
executive in 1976 earning $205,000/year (2005 USD's).
No brag. I responded to a question. I never thought it was that much then,
and I don't think it was that much now. I knew plenty of guys in the ad
biz in DC back then who were making far more.

I thought you never talked about your earnings Harry.


Harry's feeling like Kevin after a good bitch slappin'. He is now
getting very picky about the posts to which he responds. He must be
afraid too many of his inanities will get archived.

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

Harry's feeling like Kevin after a good bitch slappin'. He is now
getting very picky about the posts to which he responds. He must be
afraid too many of his inanities will get archived.

--
John
Is that why you gave up booze, Herring? Engage in too much bitch slapping?



Why did you choose to ignore my question Harry? It looks like John made a
valid statement especially since you chose to ignore it and tore into your
personal attack mode instead.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind
9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?
What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We
have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.
To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?

Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John

No, they were serving their country and made the ultimate sacrifice.
Bert deserves whatever he gets for his considerable stupidity. He "brags"
about two things in his life: his peacetime, stateside service in the
reserves and his "huge" salary.

Is it my fault that I wasn't sent overseas? No. I was ready to go if called
upon. When I was 18 I decided that I would join the USMC Reserve and serve
my country while I was continuing my education and working full time. One of
my prized possessions is my USMC Honorable Discharge pin. You don't have one
and you never will.

What were you doing when you were 18? Sitting around praying that your
lottery number was high enough that you wouldn't get drafted? Why didn't you
ever serve your country?

I don't have to fabricate my life's adventures and accomplishments. I will
tell you what they are and you can veify them easily. You on the other hand
will not respond to a direct quesiton and there is no hope of getting an
honest answer if you did answer the question.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind
9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?
What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We
have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.
To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we
invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?
Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John
No, they were serving their country and made the ultimate sacrifice.
Bert deserves whatever he gets for his considerable stupidity. He
"brags" about two things in his life: his peacetime, stateside service
in the reserves and his "huge" salary.



I seem to recall you bragging about your compensation as a senior
executive in 1976 earning $205,000/year (2005 USD's).
No brag. I responded to a question. I never thought it was that much then,
and I don't think it was that much now. I knew plenty of guys in the ad
biz in DC back then who were making far more.

You knew people that made that much but you never made that much or anywhere
near that much.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:01:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan
Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five
in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of
Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on
Saturday.

Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's
international operations, was among five militants killed in an
explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on
Thursday.

***

Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth
in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now?
Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left.



Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move
up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?

There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda
network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it.

You understand that...eh?

The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed,
multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in
Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents
who want us out of there.

But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the
righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and
fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing.

Go for it.

What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our stomachs?


Told ya...you and hte rest of the righties head over there, and take your
kids along, and be volunteers in Bush's Folly.

My suggestion? A realization that our "military solution" isn't working,


It's working fine. In fact, it's working so well that it's making the
Dems nervous that Bush is pulling the rug out from under them on the only
issue they have left to attack Bush on: Iraq.

Hillary has begun started to criticize how the war was "managed" as a
differentiating point. The sad thing for the Democrats is that the economy
is picking up and they won't be able to use that as an issue in '06. Also,
Hillary will need to figure out whether she has a chance in hell of being
President soon in order to preserve her senate seat.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

Harry's feeling like Kevin after a good bitch slappin'. He is now
getting very picky about the posts to which he responds. He must be
afraid too many of his inanities will get archived.

--
John
Is that why you gave up booze, Herring? Engage in too much bitch
slapping?



Why did you choose to ignore my question Harry? It looks like John made
a valid statement especially since you chose to ignore it and tore into
your personal attack mode instead.


1. I don't read everything you post.
2. Some of what you post is so inane it doesn't need a response.

In case of doubt, see 1. or 2., above.


You forgot:

3. When cornered, resort to excuse 1.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 18:40:30 -0500, "Bert Robbins"
wrote:


Is it my fault that I wasn't sent overseas? No. I was ready to go if called
upon. When I was 18 I decided that I would join the USMC Reserve and serve
my country while I was continuing my education and working full time. One of
my prized possessions is my USMC Honorable Discharge pin. You don't have one
and you never will.

What were you doing when you were 18? Sitting around praying that your
lottery number was high enough that you wouldn't get drafted? Why didn't you
ever serve your country?

I don't have to fabricate my life's adventures and accomplishments. I will
tell you what they are and you can veify them easily. You on the other hand
will not respond to a direct quesiton and there is no hope of getting an
honest answer if you did answer the question.




Bert, don't extend to him the courtesy of responding to his
denigration of the Marine Corps. He's nowhere man enough to have
thought about doing anything similar.

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:33:18 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:

Harry's feeling like Kevin after a good bitch slappin'. He is now
getting very picky about the posts to which he responds. He must be
afraid too many of his inanities will get archived.

--
John
Is that why you gave up booze, Herring? Engage in too much bitch slapping?



Why did you choose to ignore my question Harry? It looks like John made a
valid statement especially since you chose to ignore it and tore into your
personal attack mode instead.




1. I don't read everything you post.

Horse apples!

2. Some of what you post is so inane it doesn't need a response.

Since when are you concerned with inanities? You've been giving even
Kevin a run for his money!

In case of doubt, see 1. or 2., above.

When did you pick up the word 'inane'? It's not been one of your
choice vocabulary words until the last day or two. :)

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 18:28:19 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:

Harry's feeling like Kevin after a good bitch slappin'. He is now
getting very picky about the posts to which he responds. He must be
afraid too many of his inanities will get archived.

--
John
Is that why you gave up booze, Herring? Engage in too much bitch slapping?

I gave up booze 'cause I was allergic to it. How are you going to use
that personal information, Harry? Can you think up something really
derogatory?

How ya feelin'? You doing OK? I've noticed you only manage to respond
to about one in ten of the responses to your inanities.

Hee, hee.

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.