'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:36:28 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Are you suggesting I amend my response to Smithers' scum because my intent
is not clear enough to him or to you?

Harry is it necessary to call me scum? Can't we all just get along?


There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about
which I give a ****. Same goes for your questions, your comments, your
whatever. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. And
I'm not angry. If you want to keep this up, go for it. Those posts yours
I see and bother to read will get the same response, if I offer any
response at all.

Is that clear enough for you? Do you get it yet, scumbag?

Let's hear it one more time!

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:50:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote:


" *JimH*" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan
Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in
Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan
bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday.

Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's
international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion
at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday.

***

Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in
command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only
10,000 "Top 5" leaders left.




Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?


I understand what you mean. What follows next is simple: If these guys are
as interchangeable as flat washers, our government shouldn't make a big deal
out of announcing when they kill or capture them. It doesn't matter.


Doug, do you not understand succession of command either?

If someone killed our President, they could do so again tomorrow, and
the day after, and the day after that, ad infinitum (well, not really,
but you get the point).

Then some extremist would be saying, "Why do you say we killed the
President fourteen times?"

Show a little more thought than Harry.

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:03:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Doug Kanter wrote:
" *JimH*" wrote in message
. ..
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan
Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in
Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan
bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday.

Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's
international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion
at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday.

***

Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in
command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only
10,000 "Top 5" leaders left.



Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?


I understand what you mean. What follows next is simple: If these guys are
as interchangeable as flat washers, our government shouldn't make a big deal
out of announcing when they kill or capture them. It doesn't matter.



Jim and others like him do not understand the concepts of finite and
infinite. The insurgents in Iraq and al Qaeda draw upon a near-infinite
number of recruits to help them drive us out of Iraq. It doesn't matter
how many we kill, because there are tens of thousands of them in the
ranks and waiting their turn to join. Killing them only helps them
recruit and makes them stronger.

When you have a president who cannot think outside of the box, young
Americans come home in one.

Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but
whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no
ideas!

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:10:55 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

wrote:
There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about
which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares.


Sounds like something Guzzi-boy would say. C'mon Harry, you don't need
to stoop THAT low....


There is no stoop low enough for a piece of crap like Smithers.

Harry, I hope you'll feel better after attending the worship service
of your choice tomorrow (or today, for that matter).



--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:08:47 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:43:35 -0500, John H. wrote:


It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost,
innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize
our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of
terrorism put together.

You think the 9/11 attack was a one shot deal, right?

No, John, the *all* was inclusive, as in *all* acts of terrorism, ever.
In other words, to be clear, if you were an innocent civilian, the cure
was worse than the disease.

And you think there would be no further acts of terrorism if we just
turned belly up?

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:14:38 -0500, thunder
wrote:

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our
stomachs?

Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?

Did I say something about Iraq, or was I responding to a post about
the war on terrorism?

Do you believe Saddam would have just been a good boy after the 21st
UN Resolution?

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

Bert Robbins wrote:
"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our
stomachs?
Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?

What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We have
found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded.

To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we invaded.
I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh?

Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they
deserve your bull****?

--
John

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the
righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and
fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing.

How many American soldiers were harmed in the pilotless drone attack on Abu
Hamza Rabia's safehouse?

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:01:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

*JimH* wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan
Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT

By Zeeshan Haider

ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five
in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan
bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday.

Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's
international operations, was among five militants killed in an
explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on
Thursday.

***

Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth
in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now?
Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left.



Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up
to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are
no more leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?

There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda
network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it.

You understand that...eh?

The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed,
multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in
Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents
who want us out of there.

But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the
righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and
fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing.

Go for it.

What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare
our stomachs?


Told ya...you and hte rest of the righties head over there, and take your
kids along, and be volunteers in Bush's Folly.

My suggestion? A realization that our "military solution" isn't working,


It's working fine. In fact, it's working so well that it's making the Dems
nervous that Bush is pulling the rug out from under them on the only issue
they have left to attack Bush on: Iraq.

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"thunder" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:


What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our
stomachs?

Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism,
*before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11,
or was it Osama bin Missin'?

It depends upon who you ask. Former CIA director James Woolsey says that
Saddam had a hand in 9/11.