![]() |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 09:54:41 -0500, " *JimH*" wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Harry's total lack of military experience shows every time. He's never heard of the concept of succession of command. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:01:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it. You understand that...eh? The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed, multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents who want us out of there. But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. Go for it. What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry,
Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? Is this a situation of we can't win, we shouldn't try? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it. You understand that...eh? The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed, multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents who want us out of there. But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. Go for it. -- The sun never sets on what Bush has soiled. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
" *JimH*" wrote in message .... Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. But *how* do they move up - that's the question. Is al Quaeda a union shop? Do they bid for position; is the advancement solely by seniority? Surely an organization so concerned with the welfare of its own people would never stoop to meritocracy. Who keeps the records, keeps track of date-of-hire? Or, are all these folks we're hearing about members of management? Could be. If that's the case, we shouldn't care if they live or die, since they are, by definition, worthless, lying scum. Good. Glad that's taken care of. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:56 -0500, Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost, innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of terrorism put together. |
Proper Noun Derivation
Harry Krause wrote:
Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. A lot of Jews seem to be named Sam or Harry, Krause. As an English major, do you know anything about the derivation of those words? -- Skipper |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? Is this a situation of we can't win, we shouldn't try? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it. You understand that...eh? The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed, multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents who want us out of there. But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. Go for it. -- The sun never sets on what Bush has soiled. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry,
This is the same anger you showed yesterday when you went shopping? Do you normally get upset around the holidays? It is not uncommon, have you considered talking to someone about it? If you want, I am always interested in hearing what you have to say. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. -- Growth: The justification for tax cuts for the rich. |
Proper Noun Derivation
Harry,
My guess is the Star of David was named after David. Am I correct? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Harry Krause wrote: Skipper wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. A lot of Jews seem to be named Sam or Harry, Krause. As an English major, do you know anything about the derivation of those words? -- Skipper Famous Jews who were called Harry: Prince Harry of Wales, real name Henry, current holder of the Prince Harry title as the second son of Charles, Prince of Wales. Prince Henry the Navigator of Portugal (1394 - 1460), also known as Harry Henry Frederick Stuart, (1593/4 - 1612) son of James I of England, another famous Harry who was Jewish. Prince Hal, a character in Shakespeare's Henry IV, part 1 and Henry IV, part 2, based on King Henry V of England. He also was known as Harry. Another Jew named Harry: Harry S Truman, president of the United States. And this has what to do with the dicquehead whose handle is Smithers? Is he Jewish? If so, who cares? If not, who cares? I mean, other than you, Adolf? Oh...I forgot. Sam Spade, famous Jewish detective. Sam Morse, famous Jewish American artist. (and a few other things). Sam Chase, famous Jewish signer of the Declaration of Independence. Sam I Am, famous Jewish character in a Seuss book. You really, truly, are an ass, Skipper. Oh, did you know a lot of Jews are named David, David Mann. Guess who the Star of David is named after. D'oh. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:21:35 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:01:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it. You understand that...eh? The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed, multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents who want us out of there. But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. Go for it. What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Told ya...you and hte rest of the righties head over there, and take your kids along, and be volunteers in Bush's Folly. My suggestion? A realization that our "military solution" isn't working, a realization that Iraq ain't gonna make it, and a national discussion of intelligent people to find some totally different "solutions." Hey, you consider yourself extremely intelligent, get the ball rolling. We sure as hell cannot depend upon the idiots in presidummy's administration for a solution. And none of the libs are prepared to present anything but anti-Bush rhetoric. Here's an idea. Someone give Bush a blowjob so we can impeach him. You are quick with the negatives, but like the rest of the libs have no ideas. Perhaps your last line *is* the best you can come up with. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:00:36 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:56 -0500, Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost, innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of terrorism put together. You think the 9/11 attack was a one shot deal, right? -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:24:05 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: thunder wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:56 -0500, Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost, innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of terrorism put together. These assholes don't care about that. In fact, they don't even want to know about it. Since 1973 over 45 million babies have been killed through abortions. Does that bother you at all? -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:23:08 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. He gave you no opinions or advice. He asked a question. Your Kevinesque 'attack mode' response shows your inability to answer. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 12:18:06 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, This is the same anger you showed yesterday when you went shopping? Do you normally get upset around the holidays? It is not uncommon, have you considered talking to someone about it? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. And I'm not angry. If you want to keep this up, go for it. Those posts yours I see and bother to read will get the same response, if I offer any response at all. Is that clear enough for you, dicquehead? Harry, it's nice to see you answering Smithers in the open and not giving us the bull**** about your 'filters'. Is the great economic news what's got you in such a snit? -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Jim, what did we miss?
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 11:49:04 -0500, "Jim Carter" wrote: "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? Is this a situation of we can't win, we shouldn't try? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it. You understand that...eh? The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed, multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents who want us out of there. But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. Go for it. -- The sun never sets on what Bush has soiled. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
JohnH,
I am trying to be considerate of Harry, he seems to be under a lot of strain recently. The only person who I feel more sorry for is the customer who was right behind Harry when he went ballistic at Best Buy. Can you imagine the poor guy trying to decide if he should stand in line, and risk being hit in the crossfire, or having to run for cover and lose his place in line. You can see how upset Harry is, because he actually thought his blow up was a good thing. "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:23:08 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. He gave you no opinions or advice. He asked a question. Your Kevinesque 'attack mode' response shows your inability to answer. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 10:42:49 -0500, "John Gaquin"
wrote: " *JimH*" wrote in message .... Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. But *how* do they move up - that's the question. Is al Quaeda a union shop? Do they bid for position; is the advancement solely by seniority? Surely an organization so concerned with the welfare of its own people would never stoop to meritocracy. Who keeps the records, keeps track of date-of-hire? Or, are all these folks we're hearing about members of management? Could be. If that's the case, we shouldn't care if they live or die, since they are, by definition, worthless, lying scum. Good. Glad that's taken care of. Whoever has the biggest gun moves up. Remember, "This is my weapon, this is my gun. One is for shooting, the other's for fun!" (An old Fort Leonard Wood refrain...) -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry *could* be in his snit because the guy behind him said, "STFU
and get moving!" I think, also, that Harry expected everyone to pat him on the back for his foul behavior. It didn't happen. I don't recall even Kevin patting him on the back. On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:55:41 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote: JohnH, I am trying to be considerate of Harry, he seems to be under a lot of strain recently. The only person who I feel more sorry for is the customer who was right behind Harry when he went ballistic at Best Buy. Can you imagine the poor guy trying to decide if he should stand in line, and risk being hit in the crossfire, or having to run for cover and lose his place in line. You can see how upset Harry is, because he actually thought his blow up was a good thing. "John H." wrote in message .. . On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:23:08 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. He gave you no opinions or advice. He asked a question. Your Kevinesque 'attack mode' response shows your inability to answer. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] -- John Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
JohnH,
You might be right, but when people have these manic followed by depressive mood swings it is often the result of a traumatic or stressful event. I have offered Harry my shoulder to cry on, and I will do my best not to offer suggestion, but just listen and say "There There.... I know .... That is OK". All the things my wife taught me to say when listening to woman. "John H." wrote in message ... Harry *could* be in his snit because the guy behind him said, "STFU and get moving!" I think, also, that Harry expected everyone to pat him on the back for his foul behavior. It didn't happen. I don't recall even Kevin patting him on the back. On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 13:55:41 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote: JohnH, I am trying to be considerate of Harry, he seems to be under a lot of strain recently. The only person who I feel more sorry for is the customer who was right behind Harry when he went ballistic at Best Buy. Can you imagine the poor guy trying to decide if he should stand in line, and risk being hit in the crossfire, or having to run for cover and lose his place in line. You can see how upset Harry is, because he actually thought his blow up was a good thing. "John H." wrote in message . .. On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:23:08 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. He gave you no opinions or advice. He asked a question. Your Kevinesque 'attack mode' response shows your inability to answer. -- John H "It's not a *baby* kicking, beautiful bride, it's just a fetus!" [A Self-obsessed Hypocrite] -- John Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry,
Since the current war on terror is not working, what should we do? "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:24:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: thunder wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:56 -0500, Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost, innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of terrorism put together. These assholes don't care about that. In fact, they don't even want to know about it. Since 1973 over 45 million babies have been killed through abortions. Does that bother you at all? 1. I don't buy into your use of the word "baby." 2. I am concerned about the unnecessary loss through Bush's Folly of living, breathing, sentient human beings. 3. I believe it is the business of a pregnant woman alone to decide whether to remain in that condition, and if not to make an appropriate decision with the help of her doctor. 4. Your attempt to divert attention from Bush's Folly is specious. -- You were right, it's all abut character. Impeach Bush Now. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Are you suggesting I amend my response to Smithers' scum because my intent is not clear enough to him or to you? Harry is it necessary to call me scum? Can't we all just get along? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
" *JimH*" wrote in message . .. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? I understand what you mean. What follows next is simple: If these guys are as interchangeable as flat washers, our government shouldn't make a big deal out of announcing when they kill or capture them. It doesn't matter. |
Proper Noun Derivation
Harry Krause wrote:
Harry Krause wrote: Skipper wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. A lot of Jews seem to be named Sam or Harry, Krause. As an English major, do you know anything about the derivation of those words? -- Skipper Famous Jews who were called Harry: Prince Harry of Wales, real name Henry, current holder of the Prince Harry title as the second son of Charles, Prince of Wales. Prince Henry the Navigator of Portugal (1394 - 1460), also known as Harry Henry Frederick Stuart, (1593/4 - 1612) son of James I of England, another famous Harry who was Jewish. Prince Hal, a character in Shakespeare's Henry IV, part 1 and Henry IV, part 2, based on King Henry V of England. He also was known as Harry. Another Jew named Harry: Harry S Truman, president of the United States. And this has what to do with the dicquehead whose handle is Smithers? Is he Jewish? If so, who cares? If not, who cares? I mean, other than you, Adolf? Oh...I forgot. Sam Spade, famous Jewish detective. Sam Morse, famous Jewish American artist. (and a few other things). Sam Chase, famous Jewish signer of the Declaration of Independence. Sam I Am, famous Jewish character in a Seuss book. You really, truly, are an ass, Skipper. Oh, did you know a lot of Jews are named David, David Mann. Guess who the Star of David is named after. D'oh. Is that Snipper's problem? He really is Jewish but hates to admit it? There must be some organization out there that can bring him to terms with his heritage. After all...how can he love others when he can't love himself. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about
which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. Sounds like something Guzzi-boy would say. C'mon Harry, you don't need to stoop THAT low.... |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:43:35 -0500, John H. wrote:
It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost, innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of terrorism put together. You think the 9/11 attack was a one shot deal, right? No, John, the *all* was inclusive, as in *all* acts of terrorism, ever. In other words, to be clear, if you were an innocent civilian, the cure was worse than the disease. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote:
What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism, *before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11, or was it Osama bin Missin'? |
Proper Noun Derivation
13. Harry Krause
Dec 3, 10:55 am show options Newsgroups: rec.boats From: Harry Krause - Find messages by this author Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:55:27 -0500 Local: Sat, Dec 3 2005 10:55 am Subject: Proper Noun Derivation Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show original | Report Abuse Note: The author of this message requested that it not be archived. This message will be removed from Groups in 6 days (Dec 10, 10:55 am). - Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Skipper wrote: Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. A lot of Jews seem to be named Sam or Harry, Krause. As an English major, do you know anything about the derivation of those words? -- Skipper Famous Jews who were called Harry: Prince Harry of Wales, real name Henry, current holder of the Prince Harry title as the second son of Charles, Prince of Wales. Harry/Henry of Wales is Anglican (Church of England "Episcopal") Prince Henry the Navigator of Portugal (1394 - 1460), also known as Harry Henry the Navigator was a member of the Catholic "Order of Christ" Henry Frederick Stuart, (1593/4 - 1612) son of James I of England, another famous Harry who was Jewish. H F Stuart was "Protestant" Prince Hal, a character in Shakespeare's Henry IV, part 1 and Henry IV, part 2, based on King Henry V of England. He also was known as Harry. Henry V was Catholic, That is until he was excommunicated by Pope Gregory VII in 1080 Another Jew named Harry: Harry S Truman, president of the United States. Truman was Southern Baptist And this has what to do with the dicquehead whose handle is Smithers? Is he Jewish? If so, who cares? If not, who cares? I mean, other than you, Adolf? Adolf had jewish relation, But ws raised Catholic |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote: What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism, *before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11, or was it Osama bin Missin'? What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded. So, you can stop with the terrorist thing and move back to the WMDs. Oh, nevermind we did find nuclear, biological and chemical weapons in Iraq or production and delivery systems which are in fact WMDs. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:28:08 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 11:23:08 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, Do you believe the war on Terror can not be won? Do you think we should give up and just realize we need to accept terrorist attacks? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. He gave you no opinions or advice. He asked a question. Your Kevinesque 'attack mode' response shows your inability to answer. Are you suggesting I amend my response to Smithers' scum because my intent is not clear enough to him or to you? Did I make a suggestion? Are you having a bad hair day? -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 14:36:28 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Are you suggesting I amend my response to Smithers' scum because my intent is not clear enough to him or to you? Harry is it necessary to call me scum? Can't we all just get along? There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Same goes for your questions, your comments, your whatever. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. And I'm not angry. If you want to keep this up, go for it. Those posts yours I see and bother to read will get the same response, if I offer any response at all. Is that clear enough for you? Do you get it yet, scumbag? Let's hear it one more time! -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 19:50:43 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: " *JimH*" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? I understand what you mean. What follows next is simple: If these guys are as interchangeable as flat washers, our government shouldn't make a big deal out of announcing when they kill or capture them. It doesn't matter. Doug, do you not understand succession of command either? If someone killed our President, they could do so again tomorrow, and the day after, and the day after that, ad infinitum (well, not really, but you get the point). Then some extremist would be saying, "Why do you say we killed the President fourteen times?" Show a little more thought than Harry. -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:03:47 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Doug Kanter wrote: " *JimH*" wrote in message . .. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? I understand what you mean. What follows next is simple: If these guys are as interchangeable as flat washers, our government shouldn't make a big deal out of announcing when they kill or capture them. It doesn't matter. Jim and others like him do not understand the concepts of finite and infinite. The insurgents in Iraq and al Qaeda draw upon a near-infinite number of recruits to help them drive us out of Iraq. It doesn't matter how many we kill, because there are tens of thousands of them in the ranks and waiting their turn to join. Killing them only helps them recruit and makes them stronger. When you have a president who cannot think outside of the box, young Americans come home in one. Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:10:55 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: wrote: There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice from you about which I give a ****. Save your keystrokes, dicquehead, for someone who cares. Sounds like something Guzzi-boy would say. C'mon Harry, you don't need to stoop THAT low.... There is no stoop low enough for a piece of crap like Smithers. Harry, I hope you'll feel better after attending the worship service of your choice tomorrow (or today, for that matter). -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:08:47 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 13:43:35 -0500, John H. wrote: It's a thought. There would definitely be fewer innocent lives lost, innocent as in having had nothing to do with terrorism. You do realize our war on terrorism has killed more civilians, than *all* acts of terrorism put together. You think the 9/11 attack was a one shot deal, right? No, John, the *all* was inclusive, as in *all* acts of terrorism, ever. In other words, to be clear, if you were an innocent civilian, the cure was worse than the disease. And you think there would be no further acts of terrorism if we just turned belly up? -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 15:14:38 -0500, thunder
wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote: What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism, *before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11, or was it Osama bin Missin'? Did I say something about Iraq, or was I responding to a post about the war on terrorism? Do you believe Saddam would have just been a good boy after the 21st UN Resolution? -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:39:22 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote: Bert Robbins wrote: "thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote: What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism, *before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11, or was it Osama bin Missin'? What proof do you have that Saddam wasn't harborring terrorists? We have found, and killed, al-Qaieda members in Iraq since we invaded. To Bertbrain, this means these terrorists were there before we invaded. I suppose there is no IQ test for entree to the marines, eh? Why denigrate the Marines, Harry. Ten were killed yesterday. Do they deserve your bull****? -- John MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. How many American soldiers were harmed in the pilotless drone attack on Abu Hamza Rabia's safehouse? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:01:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: *JimH* wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Senior Al Qaeda commander killed in Pakistan Sat Dec 3, 2005 1:48 PM GMT By Zeeshan Haider ISLAMABAD (Reuters) - An al Qaeda commander ranked among the top five in Osama bin Laden's network was killed in a tribal region of Pakistan bordering Afghanistan, President Pervez Musharraf said on Saturday. Abu Hamza Rabia, an Egyptian credited with heading al Qaeda's international operations, was among five militants killed in an explosion at a house where they were hiding in North Waziristan on Thursday. *** Let's see, we've killed the 2nd in command, third in command, fourth in command, fifth in command al Qaeda leader what, 20 times each now? Only 10,000 "Top 5" leaders left. Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? There will always be a Top 5 because there will always be an al Qaeda network, or a similar network by another name to succeed it. You understand that...eh? The almighty US military cannot defeat a large, well-financed, multi-national, faith-based group like al Qaeda. All we are doing in Iraq is providing advanced training for al Qaeda and for the insurgents who want us out of there. But, hey, if you want to volunteer up your son and if the rest of the righties here want to volunteer up their sons to head over to Iraq and fight in Bush's Folly, you don't need my permission or blessing. Go for it. What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Told ya...you and hte rest of the righties head over there, and take your kids along, and be volunteers in Bush's Folly. My suggestion? A realization that our "military solution" isn't working, It's working fine. In fact, it's working so well that it's making the Dems nervous that Bush is pulling the rug out from under them on the only issue they have left to attack Bush on: Iraq. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"thunder" wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 10:26:10 -0500, John H. wrote: What would you suggest, Oh Harry? Should we just roll over and bare our stomachs? Explain to us again, John, what did Iraq have to do with terrorism, *before* we invaded? Help me out here, John, was it Saddam behind 9/11, or was it Osama bin Missin'? It depends upon who you ask. Former CIA director James Woolsey says that Saddam had a hand in 9/11. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:10 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com