|
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:vOEkf.317 His reasoning: Just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think three-year-olds can think at that level. IIRC, noting potential results of specific actions is the stuff of frontal brain lobe development, which doesn't occur until about age 7+ or so. More likely, he saw someone else being slapped, and considered it ok in a rudimentary way. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:19:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:15:31 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. 4) Get our troops out of whatever country these people are whining about at the moment. Like Iraq. Indicate to the list of potential offenders that it is now the job of their governments and clergy to keep their problems within their own borders, where they belong. In other words, "We're leaving, as you asked. Now you have nothing to cry and complain about. If you need to continue complaining, do it in your own rooms, with the doors closed and don't come out until you're ready to behave properly. If you find mullahs who still want to preach hatred and destruction, we will gladly help you 'calm' them down, via lobotomy, prison (here), or whatever is necessary. Drop them off at the nearest embassy and we'll handle it from there. We'll be doing the same with Pat Robertson, Dick Cheney, and some of our other mullahs". Of course, the world will think this is madness, so we should demonstrate, just once, on an unpopulated target. Sounds like a plan. Of course, when the first bomb was dropped all the liberals in the world would be screaming about the number of innocent civilians killed, regardless of how many American lives were lost. -- John H I'm a liberal. I wouldn't argue with discipline which was fairly and accurately explained before the misbehavior occurred. It's common sense, like raising kids. So you would punish one kid for the acts of the other? -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Bert Robbins wrote:
Canada's economy is so entertwined with the US economy that you couldn't stand on your own feet if you didn't have the US as a trading partner. And, drilling a hole in a 2x4 is not manufacturing a porduct! Yeah...but thanks to you Wal-Mart shoppers..the Chinese now have the cash to start buying our products...such as oil & lumber. Now if we could just figure out a way to send our surplus hydro electricity over to them..... do you think Georgie Boy will let us build hi tension electricity cables across Alaska? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"John H." wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:19:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:15:31 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:9s64p1dd92k33ljlt2aknmuo59cm0hdk64@4ax. com... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. 4) Get our troops out of whatever country these people are whining about at the moment. Like Iraq. Indicate to the list of potential offenders that it is now the job of their governments and clergy to keep their problems within their own borders, where they belong. In other words, "We're leaving, as you asked. Now you have nothing to cry and complain about. If you need to continue complaining, do it in your own rooms, with the doors closed and don't come out until you're ready to behave properly. If you find mullahs who still want to preach hatred and destruction, we will gladly help you 'calm' them down, via lobotomy, prison (here), or whatever is necessary. Drop them off at the nearest embassy and we'll handle it from there. We'll be doing the same with Pat Robertson, Dick Cheney, and some of our other mullahs". Of course, the world will think this is madness, so we should demonstrate, just once, on an unpopulated target. Sounds like a plan. Of course, when the first bomb was dropped all the liberals in the world would be screaming about the number of innocent civilians killed, regardless of how many American lives were lost. -- John H I'm a liberal. I wouldn't argue with discipline which was fairly and accurately explained before the misbehavior occurred. It's common sense, like raising kids. So you would punish one kid for the acts of the other? Liberals are punishing kids for the acts, or failure to act, of other kids! |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:19:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:15:31 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:9s64p1dd92k33ljlt2aknmuo59cm0hdk64@4ax .com... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. 4) Get our troops out of whatever country these people are whining about at the moment. Like Iraq. Indicate to the list of potential offenders that it is now the job of their governments and clergy to keep their problems within their own borders, where they belong. In other words, "We're leaving, as you asked. Now you have nothing to cry and complain about. If you need to continue complaining, do it in your own rooms, with the doors closed and don't come out until you're ready to behave properly. If you find mullahs who still want to preach hatred and destruction, we will gladly help you 'calm' them down, via lobotomy, prison (here), or whatever is necessary. Drop them off at the nearest embassy and we'll handle it from there. We'll be doing the same with Pat Robertson, Dick Cheney, and some of our other mullahs". Of course, the world will think this is madness, so we should demonstrate, just once, on an unpopulated target. Sounds like a plan. Of course, when the first bomb was dropped all the liberals in the world would be screaming about the number of innocent civilians killed, regardless of how many American lives were lost. -- John H I'm a liberal. I wouldn't argue with discipline which was fairly and accurately explained before the misbehavior occurred. It's common sense, like raising kids. So you would punish one kid for the acts of the other? Liberals are punishing kids for the acts, or failure to act, of other kids! Liberalism.......The fear that somewhere, someone is having a good time. The goal of Liberalism.....To have everyone share equally in misery. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"John Gaquin" wrote in message . .. "Doug Kanter" wrote in message news:vOEkf.317 His reasoning: Just wanted to see what would happen. I don't think three-year-olds can think at that level. IIRC, noting potential results of specific actions is the stuff of frontal brain lobe development, which doesn't occur until about age 7+ or so. More likely, he saw someone else being slapped, and considered it ok in a rudimentary way. Probably the 3 stooges. My fault. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message nk.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Put them in timeout? Close, but it's permanent time out. Secret jails in Eastern Europe! |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"John H." wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:19:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:15:31 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:9s64p1dd92k33ljlt2aknmuo59cm0hdk64@4ax. com... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. 4) Get our troops out of whatever country these people are whining about at the moment. Like Iraq. Indicate to the list of potential offenders that it is now the job of their governments and clergy to keep their problems within their own borders, where they belong. In other words, "We're leaving, as you asked. Now you have nothing to cry and complain about. If you need to continue complaining, do it in your own rooms, with the doors closed and don't come out until you're ready to behave properly. If you find mullahs who still want to preach hatred and destruction, we will gladly help you 'calm' them down, via lobotomy, prison (here), or whatever is necessary. Drop them off at the nearest embassy and we'll handle it from there. We'll be doing the same with Pat Robertson, Dick Cheney, and some of our other mullahs". Of course, the world will think this is madness, so we should demonstrate, just once, on an unpopulated target. Sounds like a plan. Of course, when the first bomb was dropped all the liberals in the world would be screaming about the number of innocent civilians killed, regardless of how many American lives were lost. -- John H I'm a liberal. I wouldn't argue with discipline which was fairly and accurately explained before the misbehavior occurred. It's common sense, like raising kids. So you would punish one kid for the acts of the other? -- John H That's exactly what your president is doing in Iraq. I'd just change the plan to give bad people an opportunity to clean up their acts. Not much of an opportunity, but still...... |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
*JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Good morning Kevin. I really do look forward to you posting to this board every weekday morning so I can start my day with a good laugh. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Kevin,
If the Queen of England dies, or the President of the US etc. dies, do you think someone else becomes the new Queen/King of England, or the President of the US etc? wrote in message oups.com... *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:48:32 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote:
"John H." wrote in message .. . On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:19:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message ... On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:15:31 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:9s64p1dd92k33ljlt2aknmuo59cm0hdk64@4ax .com... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. 4) Get our troops out of whatever country these people are whining about at the moment. Like Iraq. Indicate to the list of potential offenders that it is now the job of their governments and clergy to keep their problems within their own borders, where they belong. In other words, "We're leaving, as you asked. Now you have nothing to cry and complain about. If you need to continue complaining, do it in your own rooms, with the doors closed and don't come out until you're ready to behave properly. If you find mullahs who still want to preach hatred and destruction, we will gladly help you 'calm' them down, via lobotomy, prison (here), or whatever is necessary. Drop them off at the nearest embassy and we'll handle it from there. We'll be doing the same with Pat Robertson, Dick Cheney, and some of our other mullahs". Of course, the world will think this is madness, so we should demonstrate, just once, on an unpopulated target. Sounds like a plan. Of course, when the first bomb was dropped all the liberals in the world would be screaming about the number of innocent civilians killed, regardless of how many American lives were lost. -- John H I'm a liberal. I wouldn't argue with discipline which was fairly and accurately explained before the misbehavior occurred. It's common sense, like raising kids. So you would punish one kid for the acts of the other? -- John H That's exactly what your president is doing in Iraq. I'd just change the plan to give bad people an opportunity to clean up their acts. Not much of an opportunity, but still...... The President is punishing no one now. He punished Saddam for the things Saddam did. Don't get me wrong. I love your idea. It's like a 'one way' MAD policy! I think it would make no difference to terrorist leaders who have shown their disregard for any life, except their own. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
|
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"John H." wrote in message ... On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 12:48:32 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:19:59 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message m... On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 14:15:31 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:jv84p1p45tlcsf9mqfnliqrf6l9010am04@4ax. com... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message news:9s64p1dd92k33ljlt2aknmuo59cm0hdk64@4a x.com... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. 4) Get our troops out of whatever country these people are whining about at the moment. Like Iraq. Indicate to the list of potential offenders that it is now the job of their governments and clergy to keep their problems within their own borders, where they belong. In other words, "We're leaving, as you asked. Now you have nothing to cry and complain about. If you need to continue complaining, do it in your own rooms, with the doors closed and don't come out until you're ready to behave properly. If you find mullahs who still want to preach hatred and destruction, we will gladly help you 'calm' them down, via lobotomy, prison (here), or whatever is necessary. Drop them off at the nearest embassy and we'll handle it from there. We'll be doing the same with Pat Robertson, Dick Cheney, and some of our other mullahs". Of course, the world will think this is madness, so we should demonstrate, just once, on an unpopulated target. Sounds like a plan. Of course, when the first bomb was dropped all the liberals in the world would be screaming about the number of innocent civilians killed, regardless of how many American lives were lost. -- John H I'm a liberal. I wouldn't argue with discipline which was fairly and accurately explained before the misbehavior occurred. It's common sense, like raising kids. So you would punish one kid for the acts of the other? -- John H That's exactly what your president is doing in Iraq. I'd just change the plan to give bad people an opportunity to clean up their acts. Not much of an opportunity, but still...... The President is punishing no one now. He punished Saddam for the things Saddam did. Don't get me wrong. I love your idea. It's like a 'one way' MAD policy! I think it would make no difference to terrorist leaders who have shown their disregard for any life, except their own. -- John H You're right (about terrorist leaders). But, it just might give a few parents a reason to pause and think before they let their kids pursue the "seven virgins in paradise" bull****. That kind of glory isn't so much different than what youngsters here think they'll achieve if they join a gang and as part of the initiation rites, go out and kill a cop. Parents *do* have some effect, sometimes. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry,
Kevin was not questioning the theory of a war of attrition. He didn't understand the basic concept of succession of command. Let's be honest with each other, don't you find Kevin to be very humorous? It would be hard to find someone as funny as Kevin if we tried. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. -- Bush-Cheney: Over A Billion Whoppers Served! |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 22:40:19 GMT, "Doug Kanter" wrote: "John H." wrote in message om... Harrry, you should have added the fact that you can do nothing but whine about it, 'cause you, like the rest of the liberals, have no ideas! John, I'm a liberal, and I have a plan. I explained it to you and NOYB over a year ago. It's absolutely perfect. It's derived from commonly accepted methods of discliplining children. Have you forgotten already? Yup. It must not have overly impressed me, or I didn't see it. Tell me again, please. But please don't adopt Harry's cut and run attitude, 'cause that won't fly. -- John 1) Indicate to Muslim-dominant countries that we have a lottery tumbler filled with balls containing the names of every town in their countries with a population greater than some number. Let's use 5,000 as a minimum population. Show a demo of the tumbler on television, being spun by a scantily clad woman. 2) Any time American property or life is attacked, anywhere, we will quickly determine if the attack appears to have been conducted by Islamic wackos. We don't need to know specifically who. One bunch or another usually claims responsibility. That's how radicals have always been, regardless of whether they're Irish, Colombian, skinheads, Italian, SDS, whatever. It's an ego thing. 3) Indicate to the list of governments that if an attack on us takes place anywhere, we will spin the lottery tumbler, pick a town, and level it completely. Might take a few days, since there's a limit as to how much weaponry a jet can carry, but we'll be sure to do a good job. It's important that the attack begin with seconds of the named ball falling from the lottery tumbler. No choking one's chicken for 8 months, as your president did with Iraq. I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. How do you figure? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
I think Harry is getting jealous of all the nice attention Kevin gets. It seems as though Harry is
making a valiant effort to take Kevin's place. Yesterday with Harry was priceless! On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:45:31 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote: JohnH, If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his post concerning "succession of command". Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn? "John H." wrote in message .. . On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. Is the difference between a chess piece and a chess player hard to understand? I could imagine Kevin having that problem, but you? -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
JohnH,
For what it is worth, I don't think Kevin ever had a mind, and Harry is very quickly losing his. "John H." wrote in message ... I think Harry is getting jealous of all the nice attention Kevin gets. It seems as though Harry is making a valiant effort to take Kevin's place. Yesterday with Harry was priceless! On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 08:45:31 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote: JohnH, If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his post concerning "succession of command". Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn? "John H." wrote in message . .. On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
It is hard to tell if Harry really couldn't understand the difference or he
was choosing not to. At one time, I always thought Harry would pick and chose what he "chose to believe". Now it seems that Harry is losing it quickly, and is having trouble telling the difference. That might be the result of dementia or it might be a result of depression, aggravated by his NPD. Harry's outburst at the Best Buy is very typical of those suffering from severe depression. Kevin really can not tell the difference and will posts 3 or 4 links showing you that he is wrong. "John H." wrote in message ... On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. Is the difference between a chess piece and a chess player hard to understand? I could imagine Kevin having that problem, but you? -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you peace, fellowship, and good humor as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry,
I would love to play you in a game of chess. Your opening move would be very grand and predictable, and then you would fold up as you went into defensive mode. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic and predictable. You're be a lousy chess player. Stick to tick-tack-toe. -- If Jeb runs, I'm moving to a country whose dictator comes from a |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry,
Is it necessary to use profanity when responding to posts? I would suggest that your use of profanity demonstrates your inability to express yourself so you fall back on profanity to make up for your deficiencies. If you would like a recommendation for some books on effective writing styles, let me know. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, You obviously have a reading comprehension problem, ****-for-brains: There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice or information from you about which I give a ****. Same goes for your questions, your comments, your "advice," your whatever. Save your keystrokes for someone who cares. Is that clear enough for you? Do you get it yet, scumbag? We're *not* going to be engaging in dialogue, now or ever. All you will get when I bother to respond at all is a canned response. Now, go out and do what you and your boys say you do best: go slap some bitches. -- George W. Bush: American Nero. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. How do you figure? A nuke costs far less than the material costs of multiple precision-guided warheads delivered by multiple aircraft sorties. And the nuke can be delivered by a submarine beneath the sea hundreds of miles away...putting our troops at zero risk against a country like Iran. Let me clarify my position a little bit, because I certainly don't favor a nuke retaliation against a country as a first choice. *IF* one of our cities is hit by a WMD attack (nuclear, or large-scale chemical/biological), *THEN* I would favor a nuclear response. If we fell victim to an attack like 9/11, or Spain/Britain's railway bombings, I'd favor a Tomahawk missile response with conventional warheads (MOABs). So I'd venture to say that your and my positions don't vary by very much. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... If Jeb runs, I'm moving to a country whose dictator comes from a ????? Harry, Please finish your signature line. I want to make sure I hold you to it in 2008. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"NOYB" wrote in message ink.net... "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. How do you figure? A nuke costs far less than the material costs of multiple precision-guided warheads delivered by multiple aircraft sorties. And the nuke can be delivered by a submarine beneath the sea hundreds of miles away...putting our troops at zero risk against a country like Iran. Let me clarify my position a little bit, because I certainly don't favor a nuke retaliation against a country as a first choice. *IF* one of our cities is hit by a WMD attack (nuclear, or large-scale chemical/biological), *THEN* I would favor a nuclear response. If we fell victim to an attack like 9/11, or Spain/Britain's railway bombings, I'd favor a Tomahawk missile response with conventional warheads (MOABs). So I'd venture to say that your and my positions don't vary by very much. The problem with a nuclear response is that there's no reason to victimize people hundreds or thousands of miles away in countries which are in no way involved with this mess. As far as putting our soldiers at risk, we can deliver guided conventional missiles from B-52s at altitudes where they're untouchable. Your comment about cost is most certainly a joke. The cost of a few missiles pales in comparison to what we're spending every day in Iraq, with a goal which could be reached with a handful of Viagra correctly distributed within the beltway. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. How do you figure? A nuke costs far less than the material costs of multiple precision-guided warheads delivered by multiple aircraft sorties. And the nuke can be delivered by a submarine beneath the sea hundreds of miles away...putting our troops at zero risk against a country like Iran. Let me clarify my position a little bit, because I certainly don't favor a nuke retaliation against a country as a first choice. *IF* one of our cities is hit by a WMD attack (nuclear, or large-scale chemical/biological), *THEN* I would favor a nuclear response. Yeah, which country would you target, Dr. Happy Tooth? And how would you know whether *any* country had anything to do with it? After all, Presidummy claimed Iraq had a hand in 9-11, and it didn't. I'd put Tehran and Damascus on the top of any list. Prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom, I'd have had Baghdad on my list. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Doug Kanter" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message k.net... I proposed a similar scenario a couple of years ago. Link each US city up with an equal-sized city in a "Muslim-dominant" country. For example, if NY gets hit (population 8.1 million), buh-bye to 3/4 of Tehran (population 12 million). But I favored nukes over conventional weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. Only stupid people would actually advocate the use of nuclear weapons. They're cheaper and put US forces at less risk. How do you figure? A nuke costs far less than the material costs of multiple precision-guided warheads delivered by multiple aircraft sorties. And the nuke can be delivered by a submarine beneath the sea hundreds of miles away...putting our troops at zero risk against a country like Iran. Let me clarify my position a little bit, because I certainly don't favor a nuke retaliation against a country as a first choice. *IF* one of our cities is hit by a WMD attack (nuclear, or large-scale chemical/biological), *THEN* I would favor a nuclear response. Yeah, which country would you target, Dr. Happy Tooth? And how would you know whether *any* country had anything to do with it? After all, Presidummy claimed Iraq had a hand in 9-11, and it didn't. I'd put Tehran and Damascus on the top of any list. Prior to Operation Iraqi Freedom, I'd have had Baghdad on my list. No one is going to let anyone pull a Presidummy Bush again. You have to be able to prove complicity of a foreign power. So, I ask you again: How would you know? I wouldn't care because it doesn't matter. Consider my method the RICO version of combatting terrorism. Guilt by association. All three countries that I mentioned openly aid (or aided) terrorist groups that have killed Americans and Israelis. They're all guilty. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Harry Krause wrote:
Yeah, which country would you target, Dr. Happy Tooth? And how would you know whether *any* country had anything to do with it? After all, Presidummy claimed Iraq had a hand in 9-11, and it didn't. He'd 'nuke 'em all' and let God sort it out. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
NOYB wrote:
I wouldn't care because it doesn't matter. Consider my method the RICO version of combatting terrorism. Guilt by association. All three countries that I mentioned openly aid (or aided) terrorist groups that have killed Americans and Israelis. They're all guilty. I sure hope you wouldn't be on the jury if I was on trial for a serious offence. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Don White" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: I wouldn't care because it doesn't matter. Consider my method the RICO version of combatting terrorism. Guilt by association. All three countries that I mentioned openly aid (or aided) terrorist groups that have killed Americans and Israelis. They're all guilty. I sure hope you wouldn't be on the jury if I was on trial for a serious offence. In NOYB's dream world, there would be no juries. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:
John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic and predictable. You're be a lousy chess player. Stick to tick-tack-toe. You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the Belarussian kid who comes in the summer. But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities, or my money, or my education, or my boat(s), or my adventures, or my wife's education, or my guns, or my letters from POTUS, or ... Well, you get the idea. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Now he'll spend 12 hours working on his 'macro' trying to remove the profanity!
On Mon, 5 Dec 2005 12:00:39 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote: Harry, Is it necessary to use profanity when responding to posts? I would suggest that your use of profanity demonstrates your inability to express yourself so you fall back on profanity to make up for your deficiencies. If you would like a recommendation for some books on effective writing styles, let me know. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Harry, You obviously have a reading comprehension problem, ****-for-brains: There is not one opinion of yours nor one piece of advice or information from you about which I give a ****. Same goes for your questions, your comments, your "advice," your whatever. Save your keystrokes for someone who cares. Is that clear enough for you? Do you get it yet, scumbag? We're *not* going to be engaging in dialogue, now or ever. All you will get when I bother to respond at all is a canned response. Now, go out and do what you and your boys say you do best: go slap some bitches. -- George W. Bush: American Nero. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Doug Kanter wrote:
"Don White" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: I wouldn't care because it doesn't matter. Consider my method the RICO version of combatting terrorism. Guilt by association. All three countries that I mentioned openly aid (or aided) terrorist groups that have killed Americans and Israelis. They're all guilty. I sure hope you wouldn't be on the jury if I was on trial for a serious offence. In NOYB's dream world, there would be no juries. Our own 'Judge Dread'.... law enforcer, judge & executioner. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic and predictable. You're be a lousy chess player. Stick to tick-tack-toe. You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the Belarussian kid who comes in the summer. But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities, Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you. Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I trained myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That alone moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players. I have yet to lose to a computerized chess game. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... NOYB wrote: "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic and predictable. You're be a lousy chess player. Stick to tick-tack-toe. You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the Belarussian kid who comes in the summer. But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities, Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you. Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I trained myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That alone moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players. I have yet to lose to a computerized chess game. Let us know how you do against Hydra, or even the non-restricted Shredder. You didn't let me finish: I also have yet to win against a computerized chess game. |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:16 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com