BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again. (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/63643-re-top-5-al-qaeda-leader-killed-again.html)

John H. December 5th 05 08:32 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 18:54:27 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.

If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't
seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic
and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.

You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,



Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I trained
myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That alone
moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.


I have yet to lose to a computerized chess game.


Me either.

--
John H

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day.

John H. December 5th 05 08:33 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 19:17:52 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.
If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you
don't seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is
dogmatic and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.
You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,

Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I
trained myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected.
That alone moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.

I have yet to lose to a computerized chess game.



Let us know how you do against Hydra, or even the non-restricted Shredder.


You didn't let me finish:

I also have yet to win against a computerized chess game.



Me either. And I'm not bragging about it, either!

--
John H

MERRY CHRISTMAS!

Wishing you Peace, Fellowship, and Good Humor as we celebrate the birth of OUR Lord, Jesus Christ on the Christmas Holy Day.

Lord Reginald Smithers December 5th 05 08:38 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
Harry,
I am very impressed, I would consider it a honor to play chess against
someone of your caliber.

My guess is I would bet your ass.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.

If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't
seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic
and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.


You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,



Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I trained
myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That alone
moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.



Bush Healthcare Plan: Just don't get sick.




P Fritz December 5th 05 09:05 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
"Narcissistic men can be infatuated with their own looks, too,
.............. but are more likely than women to get hung up on their
intelligence or the importance of their work -- doesn't matter what the work
is, if he's doing it, by definition it's more important than anything you
could possibly do"

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor.
wrote in message ...
Harry,
I am very impressed, I would consider it a honor to play chess against
someone of your caliber.

My guess is I would bet your ass.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause


wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.

If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you

don't
seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic
and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.

You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,



Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I

trained
myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That alone
moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.



Bush Healthcare Plan: Just don't get sick.






Lord Reginald Smithers December 5th 05 09:19 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
Paul,
If I hadn't read the article, I would think you are making this up. No
where have I ever seen anyone match their DSMV-IV description as closely as
Harry has.
Here is a shorter description of NPD. I defy anyone to find one
characteristic that doesn't fit Harry to a T.

http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/di...issisticpd.htm



"P Fritz" wrote in message
...
"Narcissistic men can be infatuated with their own looks, too,
............. but are more likely than women to get hung up on their
intelligence or the importance of their work -- doesn't matter what the
work
is, if he's doing it, by definition it's more important than anything you
could possibly do"

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my
manor.
wrote in message ...
Harry,
I am very impressed, I would consider it a honor to play chess against
someone of your caliber.

My guess is I would bet your ass.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause


wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others
then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play
chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the
Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is
possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players
ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could
never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your
new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.

If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you

don't
seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is
dogmatic
and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.

You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,


Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I

trained
myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That
alone
moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.



Bush Healthcare Plan: Just don't get sick.








P Fritz December 5th 05 09:56 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
Not only match, but match every possible definition....................to a
TEE.

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor.
wrote in message ...
Paul,
If I hadn't read the article, I would think you are making this up. No
where have I ever seen anyone match their DSMV-IV description as closely

as
Harry has.
Here is a shorter description of NPD. I defy anyone to find one
characteristic that doesn't fit Harry to a T.

http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/di...issisticpd.htm



"P Fritz" wrote in message
...
"Narcissistic men can be infatuated with their own looks, too,
............. but are more likely than women to get hung up on their
intelligence or the importance of their work -- doesn't matter what the
work
is, if he's doing it, by definition it's more important than anything

you
could possibly do"

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my
manor.
wrote in message ...
Harry,
I am very impressed, I would consider it a honor to play chess against
someone of your caliber.

My guess is I would bet your ass.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause


wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story.

Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others
then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until

there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play
chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the
Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one

gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques

don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate

my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is
possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players
ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could
never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your
new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.

If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you

don't
seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is
dogmatic
and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.

You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,


Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam

you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess.

I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I

trained
myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That
alone
moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.



Bush Healthcare Plan: Just don't get sick.









NOYB December 6th 05 12:38 AM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor.
wrote in message ...
JohnH,
If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is
priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than
anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his
post concerning "succession of command".

Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn?


Penn State. Or was it Georgia Tech?



Lord Reginald Smithers December 6th 05 12:46 AM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
NOYB,
Actually it was all 3.


"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my
manor. wrote in message
...
JohnH,
If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is
priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than
anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his
post concerning "succession of command".

Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn?


Penn State. Or was it Georgia Tech?





NOYB December 6th 05 01:13 AM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor.
wrote in message ...
NOYB,
Actually it was all 3.


He should be one smart cookie. So what happened? Too much dope?



Lord Reginald Smithers December 6th 05 03:40 AM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
NOYB,
I think it was dope with weed killer sprayed on it.


"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my
manor. wrote in message
...
NOYB,
Actually it was all 3.


He should be one smart cookie. So what happened? Too much dope?





P. Fritz December 6th 05 04:37 AM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my

manor.
wrote in message ...
JohnH,
If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is
priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than
anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his
post concerning "succession of command".

Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn?


Penn State. Or was it Georgia Tech?



Remember, he got that graduate degree from Tech that they have never
offered.



Bill McKee December 6th 05 05:12 AM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

"P. Fritz" wrote in message
...

"NOYB" wrote in message
.net...

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my

manor.
wrote in message ...
JohnH,
If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is
priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than
anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his
post concerning "succession of command".

Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn?


Penn State. Or was it Georgia Tech?



Remember, he got that graduate degree from Tech that they have never
offered.



He said he was really smart.



samvaknin December 6th 05 03:38 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
Hi,

You may find these of added interest:

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/npdglance.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/12.html

http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/14.html

Take care.

Sam


Lord Reginald Smithers wrote:
Paul,
If I hadn't read the article, I would think you are making this up. No
where have I ever seen anyone match their DSMV-IV description as closely as
Harry has.
Here is a shorter description of NPD. I defy anyone to find one
characteristic that doesn't fit Harry to a T.

http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/di...issisticpd.htm



"P Fritz" wrote in message
...
"Narcissistic men can be infatuated with their own looks, too,
............. but are more likely than women to get hung up on their
intelligence or the importance of their work -- doesn't matter what the
work
is, if he's doing it, by definition it's more important than anything you
could possibly do"

"Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my
manor.
wrote in message ...
Harry,
I am very impressed, I would consider it a honor to play chess against
someone of your caliber.

My guess is I would bet your ass.


"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause


wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause
wrote:

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:

*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely
you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others
then
move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there
are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?
Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play
chess,
and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the
Queen??
Another who knows nothing of succession of command.
In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets
killed, the other wins. Amen.

Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't
work. You were there, right? We lost.
Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my
statement about chess to Vietnam
attrition techniques.
In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the
command of a king, as it were.

The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is
possible
to replace "killed" players within the game.

Not much of a chess player, eh?

The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players
ready
to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could
never
win a war of attrition there.

And which is why we are losing Iraq.
If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your
new
shotguns, you would be the
winner, not me.

If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No
shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you

don't
seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is
dogmatic
and predictable.

You're be a lousy chess player.

Stick to tick-tack-toe.

You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the
Belarussian kid who comes in the
summer.

But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities,


Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you.
Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I
lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I

trained
myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That
alone
moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players.



Bush Healthcare Plan: Just don't get sick.






[email protected] December 6th 05 04:04 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?


Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??


Another who knows nothing of succession of command.


Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide
succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how
Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them.
Please forward them, okay?

In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen.


You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like
that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the
board?????


Lord Reginald Smithers December 6th 05 04:27 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
Kevin,
There are two opposing players, with many different pieces at their
disposal. I am glad I could clarify this for you.


wrote in message
oups.com...

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move
up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no
more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?

Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??


Another who knows nothing of succession of command.


Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide
succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how
Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them.
Please forward them, okay?

In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed,
the other wins. Amen.


You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like
that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the
board?????




John H. December 6th 05 08:11 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
On 6 Dec 2005 08:04:24 -0800, wrote:


John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800,
wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?

Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??


Another who knows nothing of succession of command.


Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide
succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how
Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them.
Please forward them, okay?


Go read the post I made to Harry. It's pretty simple.

In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen.


You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like
that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the
board?????


Did I mention the word 'pieces'? No, I said 'players'. The 'players' are the guys that determine to
where the pieces get moved. Again, there's nothing difficult there.

[N.B. Your attempt to make an argument here does not speak well of you.]
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!

John H. December 6th 05 08:12 PM

'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
 
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:27:35 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to
my manor. wrote:

Kevin,
There are two opposing players, with many different pieces at their
disposal. I am glad I could clarify this for you.


wrote in message
roups.com...

John H. wrote:
On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:

Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you
understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move
up to
take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no
more
leaders left to fill the ranks.

You understand that....eh?

Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and
someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen??

Another who knows nothing of succession of command.


Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide
succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how
Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them.
Please forward them, okay?

In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed,
the other wins. Amen.


You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like
that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the
board?????



Thanks so much. I'm hoping he understands. I'm using words that are two big, I suppose.
--
John Herring

Hope your Christmas is Spectacular,
and your New Year even Better!


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com