![]() |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"NOYB" wrote in message .net... "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... JohnH, If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his post concerning "succession of command". Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn? Penn State. Or was it Georgia Tech? Remember, he got that graduate degree from Tech that they have never offered. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
"P. Fritz" wrote in message ... "NOYB" wrote in message .net... "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... JohnH, If this NG did not have a "Kevin" we would have to invent one. He is priceless, and in my humble opinion brings more joy to rec.boats than anyone else. I almost spit coffee all over my monitor when I read his post concerning "succession of command". Kevin is one in a million. Did you know he graduated from U of Penn? Penn State. Or was it Georgia Tech? Remember, he got that graduate degree from Tech that they have never offered. He said he was really smart. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Hi,
You may find these of added interest: http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/npdglance.html http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/12.html http://malignantselflove.tripod.com/14.html Take care. Sam Lord Reginald Smithers wrote: Paul, If I hadn't read the article, I would think you are making this up. No where have I ever seen anyone match their DSMV-IV description as closely as Harry has. Here is a shorter description of NPD. I defy anyone to find one characteristic that doesn't fit Harry to a T. http://www.behavenet.com/capsules/di...issisticpd.htm "P Fritz" wrote in message ... "Narcissistic men can be infatuated with their own looks, too, ............. but are more likely than women to get hung up on their intelligence or the importance of their work -- doesn't matter what the work is, if he's doing it, by definition it's more important than anything you could possibly do" "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to my manor. wrote in message ... Harry, I am very impressed, I would consider it a honor to play chess against someone of your caliber. My guess is I would bet your ass. "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 11:26:20 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 09:13:48 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On Mon, 05 Dec 2005 08:44:04 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. Sorry, but Vietnam proved the "war of attrition" techniques don't work. You were there, right? We lost. Harry, only someone with your extreme intelligence could relate my statement about chess to Vietnam attrition techniques. In chess, there are two opposing teams of many players under the command of a king, as it were. The game isn't over when a player is killed. Further, it is possible to replace "killed" players within the game. Not much of a chess player, eh? The North Vietnamese had a virtually endless supply of players ready to take over from those who were killed. Which is why we could never win a war of attrition there. And which is why we are losing Iraq. If you and I were playing chess, and you shot me with one of your new shotguns, you would be the winner, not me. If the two of us were playing chess, you would lose, every time. No shotguns would be needed. You don't think well out of the box, you don't seem to be able to think abstractly, and all your thinking is dogmatic and predictable. You're be a lousy chess player. Stick to tick-tack-toe. You're be right. I am a lousy chess player. I can barely beat the Belarussian kid who comes in the summer. But then, I've never bragged about my chess abilities, Neither have I. I'm not that good a player, but I am sure I'd slam you. Your thinking processes are too predictable to be any good at chess. I lost nearly 25 games straight to a computerized chess game until I trained myself to move in ways that wouldn't necessarily be expected. That alone moved me up to the ranks of the mediocre live chess players. Bush Healthcare Plan: Just don't get sick. |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them. Please forward them, okay? In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the board????? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
Kevin,
There are two opposing players, with many different pieces at their disposal. I am glad I could clarify this for you. wrote in message oups.com... John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them. Please forward them, okay? In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the board????? |
'Top 5' al Qaeda leader killed...again.
On Tue, 6 Dec 2005 11:27:35 -0500, "Lord Reginald Smithers" Ask me about my driveway leading up to
my manor. wrote: Kevin, There are two opposing players, with many different pieces at their disposal. I am glad I could clarify this for you. wrote in message roups.com... John H. wrote: On 5 Dec 2005 05:16:28 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Harry, Harry, Harry. This really is a terrific story. Surely you understand that when any of the top five are killed others then move up to take their place. There will always be a top five until there are no more leaders left to fill the ranks. You understand that....eh? Oh, what a spin!! So, I take it, then, that when you play chess, and someone takes your Queen, a Rook or a Knight becomes the Queen?? Another who knows nothing of succession of command. Well, gee, tell us what YOU know about how the terrorists decide succession of command. Where are these edicts that show just how Saddam, or terrorist splinter groups do this? I'd like to read them. Please forward them, okay? In a game of chess, there are two opposing players. If one gets killed, the other wins. Amen. You must be one lousy chess player to make an ignorant statement like that! Are you really saying that there are only two pieces on the board????? Thanks so much. I'm hoping he understands. I'm using words that are two big, I suppose. -- John Herring Hope your Christmas is Spectacular, and your New Year even Better! |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com