Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
|
#42
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
|
#43
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
John H. wrote: On 3 Dec 2005 19:02:25 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 17:58:26 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: John H. wrote: How many of the 45 million babies killed would have lived if they'd simply been born at the time they were killed? More than a thousand? Ten percent? One percent? -- John And think of the poor sperm that oozes out...and the eggs wasted each month. Hard question, huh? "It's just a fetus kicking, honey." Ring any bells? Here, I'll repeat one you seem to have missed. Harry, all nations have their Holy Days. Our nation does too. If you don't want to join in the celebration of Christ's birth, don't do it. Our nation does not. "Congress shall make no law......" go back and read the first amendment. Looks like they blew it. Christmas is a federal Holy Day. Nonsense. Christmas is a federal holiday, not holy day. Yes, the entymology of "holiday" is closely associated with "holy day", but if we are to accept your declaration of a national "holy day", would you please explain the religious significance of the other national "holy days?" Why not start with Labor Day? Fourth of July? (Is that in the Bible somehwere)? Maybe follow up with Ground Hog Day? :-) Why isn't Easter a national holiday? (Good Friday is a national holiday in Canada and some other countries). (Actually Ground Hog Day is the modern extension of both pagan and Christian traditions. In the ancient church it used to be called "Candlemass", and noted the end of the period of Mary's ritual purification following the Nativity) |
#44
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
"John H." wrote in message ... On 3 Dec 2005 18:42:06 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: On 3 Dec 2005 09:28:48 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Damn it, we got it in the house and it looks just like a Christmas tree. I always laugh my arse off at the very notion of a "Christmas tree." Glad the Christmas season brings you some joy. I've even seen "Christmas Trees" set up in churches. Wow. Talk about confused........ We use our tree as a place to put gifts for the needy. No confusion at all. Prior to Christmas day, the gifts are distributed to children who otherwise may not have any. Do you find this offensive? Not in the least. You make offerings to the tree, the tree blesses the offerings (gifts), and then the tree gives them back so you can enjoy them or give them to others. Very old tradition. No offerings are made to a tree. That was an assinine comment, one that I wouldn't have expected from you. You do the same thing when you pass the plate on a Sunday morning. You place offerings on the altar, but they don't just disappear to be spent in Heaven- they are prayed over, blessed, etc and then put to use in the very earthly pursuit of paying the light bill and the minister's salary. And providing food and lodging for the poor, along with other works. The decorated tree in your living room is a "pagan" symbol of the first order. The ancient Celts and the Germanic tribes had a solstice tradition where a small tree would be brought into the home and showered with offerings (tinsel, jewelry, "ornaments") to honor the Spirit of the Forest. The tree serves as a sort of altar. There are other traditions also, Chuck. And, is there something *wrong* with honoring a deity which cares for the forests? Not at all. Are you comfortable "crowning" a tree? (with a special top ornament)? I am very comfortable with putting a decoration on the top of the tree. You may call it 'crowning', but it's not a term I've ever heard. As one of my friends, (a devout Christian but not a member of a mainstream sect), points out, there is nothing in the Bible that commands anybody to celebrate Christmas or even Easter. In fact, two of the four New Testament gospels don't even mention The Natvity, and you would think that hosts of angels descending from heaven wouldn't be such a trivial detail that it was accidentally overlooked. Have you read somewhere that all of the gospels in the New Testament must say exactly the same thing? No, but if they disagree it becomes a bit more difficult to accept every single sentence in the Bible as the literal word of God, doesn't it? Do they disagree about the birth of Christ? I thought you said that the Nativity wasn't mentioned. None of the good news in Iraq is mentioned in the major media, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. The Virgin Birth story was added about 150-200 AD. Specifically to allow Christianity to compete with the worship of Mithras. Funny thing, at least to me, is that the most important story in the New Testament has to be the Resurrection. (All four gospels mention that, right?). I would think that the Easter story is diminished in importance if Jesus were a supernatural being. IOW, "A supernatural being has the power to rise from the dead." Now, put forth the theory that a loving divinity makes it possible for common, garden-variety mortals to be saved, through faith, from death and achieve some sort of "eternal life" and you've actually got a bigger miracle to celebrate. Again, that's just my opinion. You're entitled to your opinion, and, as you say, that's just your opinion. Is there a religious passage somewhere that says, "Go thou, chop down a tree, bring it into your home, and make offereings unto it?" Nah, probably not. In fact, I sort of recall that Jehovah was might upset when some of his followers were venerating a golden calf. It ain't that far from a calf to a tree. Probably no passage saying same. So what? There is no passage saying, "Buy thyself a boat and cruise Puget Sound," You do it because you enjoy it. People put Christmas trees in their homes because they enjoy them. For many, decorating the tree is a family get-together time that is most enjoyable. And I have no problem with people putting up a tree. When I go boating, I don't pretend it's a religious observance. Neither should people putting up a tree, unless they practice a religion that venerates trees. Well gee! Thanks for not having a problem with my Christmas tree. The putting up of the tree is *part* of our observance of Christmas. I'm pretending nothing. And, the tree provides a centerpiece for the electric train going round and round its base. I guess the above met with your approval? No derogatory comments? Oh, and take a good close look at that holly and mistletoe while you're at it. :-) Holly provides a decorative touch on the fireplace mantel. Intermixed with candles, lights, and other decorations it adds to the Christmas cheer. This was OK also? Can anybody who considers Christmas a Christian and religious holiday offer a good explanation for the inculsion of a venerated tree? I'd be fascinated to see it attempted. http://www.christmasarchives.com/trees.html ...and because we like them. They provide a nice gathering spot for family and friends and for the opening of gifts on Christmas morning. Nothing wrong here either? It's a shame you miss out on one of the great pleasures of life - watching the grandchildren opening their presents by the Christmas tree. Have you ever watched your grandkids opening presents by the Christmas tree, Chuck? If not, you've missed out on a lot of joy. ' Chuckie is just displaying the typical arrogance of an liebral -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
#45
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
"Bert Robbins" wrote in message ... "Harry Krause" wrote in message ... John H. wrote: How many of the 45 million babies killed would have lived if they'd simply been born at the time they were killed? More than a thousand? Ten percent? One percent? -- John And think of the poor sperm that oozes out...and the eggs wasted each month. You really don't understand the sacrement of marriage and its obligations in the Catholic church do you? "narcissists will say ANYTHING, they will trash anyone in their own self-justification, and then they will expect the immediate restoration of the status quo. They will attack you (sometimes physically) and spew a load of bile, insult, abuse, contempt, threats, etc." |
#46
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
Chuck,
I don't believe many people think 12/25 is the day Christ was born. That is the day they celebrate Christ's birthday. wrote in message oups.com... John H. wrote: On Sat, 03 Dec 2005 16:59:05 -0500, Harry Krause wrote: Harry, celebrating the birth of these Jews should be done on the day of their births. I have no problem with that. Christmas celebrates the day of one particular Jew's birth, Jesus. You may find that galling, but it's a fact. -- John Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. Nonsense. As far as I know, there isn't a single biblical scholar willing to state any specific day of the year as the birthday of Jesus. December 25 was chosen to allow the Christ-mass to supplant Germanic solstice festivals. And *that's* a fact. Christmas was rarely celebrated as anything more than just another minor feast day on the annual religious calendar until some time in the early 19th century. When you read Acts, do you see examples of early Christians celebrating Christmas and Easter? How about Paul's letters to all the early churches, do you read any exhortations to be sure to remember to celebrate Christmas on December 25, or Easter on the first Sunday after the first full moon following the spring equinox? Funny how so many people *insist* that Jesus was born on December 25, exactly, but don't have a problem with Easter wandering all around the calendar from year to year. |
#47
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:19:44 -0500, "P. Fritz"
wrote: "John H." wrote in message .. . On 3 Dec 2005 18:42:06 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: On 3 Dec 2005 09:28:48 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Damn it, we got it in the house and it looks just like a Christmas tree. I always laugh my arse off at the very notion of a "Christmas tree." Glad the Christmas season brings you some joy. I've even seen "Christmas Trees" set up in churches. Wow. Talk about confused........ We use our tree as a place to put gifts for the needy. No confusion at all. Prior to Christmas day, the gifts are distributed to children who otherwise may not have any. Do you find this offensive? Not in the least. You make offerings to the tree, the tree blesses the offerings (gifts), and then the tree gives them back so you can enjoy them or give them to others. Very old tradition. No offerings are made to a tree. That was an assinine comment, one that I wouldn't have expected from you. You do the same thing when you pass the plate on a Sunday morning. You place offerings on the altar, but they don't just disappear to be spent in Heaven- they are prayed over, blessed, etc and then put to use in the very earthly pursuit of paying the light bill and the minister's salary. And providing food and lodging for the poor, along with other works. The decorated tree in your living room is a "pagan" symbol of the first order. The ancient Celts and the Germanic tribes had a solstice tradition where a small tree would be brought into the home and showered with offerings (tinsel, jewelry, "ornaments") to honor the Spirit of the Forest. The tree serves as a sort of altar. There are other traditions also, Chuck. And, is there something *wrong* with honoring a deity which cares for the forests? Not at all. Are you comfortable "crowning" a tree? (with a special top ornament)? I am very comfortable with putting a decoration on the top of the tree. You may call it 'crowning', but it's not a term I've ever heard. As one of my friends, (a devout Christian but not a member of a mainstream sect), points out, there is nothing in the Bible that commands anybody to celebrate Christmas or even Easter. In fact, two of the four New Testament gospels don't even mention The Natvity, and you would think that hosts of angels descending from heaven wouldn't be such a trivial detail that it was accidentally overlooked. Have you read somewhere that all of the gospels in the New Testament must say exactly the same thing? No, but if they disagree it becomes a bit more difficult to accept every single sentence in the Bible as the literal word of God, doesn't it? Do they disagree about the birth of Christ? I thought you said that the Nativity wasn't mentioned. None of the good news in Iraq is mentioned in the major media, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. The Virgin Birth story was added about 150-200 AD. Specifically to allow Christianity to compete with the worship of Mithras. Funny thing, at least to me, is that the most important story in the New Testament has to be the Resurrection. (All four gospels mention that, right?). I would think that the Easter story is diminished in importance if Jesus were a supernatural being. IOW, "A supernatural being has the power to rise from the dead." Now, put forth the theory that a loving divinity makes it possible for common, garden-variety mortals to be saved, through faith, from death and achieve some sort of "eternal life" and you've actually got a bigger miracle to celebrate. Again, that's just my opinion. You're entitled to your opinion, and, as you say, that's just your opinion. Is there a religious passage somewhere that says, "Go thou, chop down a tree, bring it into your home, and make offereings unto it?" Nah, probably not. In fact, I sort of recall that Jehovah was might upset when some of his followers were venerating a golden calf. It ain't that far from a calf to a tree. Probably no passage saying same. So what? There is no passage saying, "Buy thyself a boat and cruise Puget Sound," You do it because you enjoy it. People put Christmas trees in their homes because they enjoy them. For many, decorating the tree is a family get-together time that is most enjoyable. And I have no problem with people putting up a tree. When I go boating, I don't pretend it's a religious observance. Neither should people putting up a tree, unless they practice a religion that venerates trees. Well gee! Thanks for not having a problem with my Christmas tree. The putting up of the tree is *part* of our observance of Christmas. I'm pretending nothing. And, the tree provides a centerpiece for the electric train going round and round its base. I guess the above met with your approval? No derogatory comments? Oh, and take a good close look at that holly and mistletoe while you're at it. :-) Holly provides a decorative touch on the fireplace mantel. Intermixed with candles, lights, and other decorations it adds to the Christmas cheer. This was OK also? Can anybody who considers Christmas a Christian and religious holiday offer a good explanation for the inculsion of a venerated tree? I'd be fascinated to see it attempted. http://www.christmasarchives.com/trees.html ...and because we like them. They provide a nice gathering spot for family and friends and for the opening of gifts on Christmas morning. Nothing wrong here either? It's a shame you miss out on one of the great pleasures of life - watching the grandchildren opening their presents by the Christmas tree. Have you ever watched your grandkids opening presents by the Christmas tree, Chuck? If not, you've missed out on a lot of joy. ' Chuckie is just displaying the typical arrogance of an liebral -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. Well, I see he didn't respond to the post. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
#49
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
"John H." wrote in message ... On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 23:19:44 -0500, "P. Fritz" wrote: "John H." wrote in message . .. On 3 Dec 2005 18:42:06 -0800, wrote: John H. wrote: On 3 Dec 2005 09:28:48 -0800, wrote: *JimH* wrote: Damn it, we got it in the house and it looks just like a Christmas tree. I always laugh my arse off at the very notion of a "Christmas tree." Glad the Christmas season brings you some joy. I've even seen "Christmas Trees" set up in churches. Wow. Talk about confused........ We use our tree as a place to put gifts for the needy. No confusion at all. Prior to Christmas day, the gifts are distributed to children who otherwise may not have any. Do you find this offensive? Not in the least. You make offerings to the tree, the tree blesses the offerings (gifts), and then the tree gives them back so you can enjoy them or give them to others. Very old tradition. No offerings are made to a tree. That was an assinine comment, one that I wouldn't have expected from you. You do the same thing when you pass the plate on a Sunday morning. You place offerings on the altar, but they don't just disappear to be spent in Heaven- they are prayed over, blessed, etc and then put to use in the very earthly pursuit of paying the light bill and the minister's salary. And providing food and lodging for the poor, along with other works. The decorated tree in your living room is a "pagan" symbol of the first order. The ancient Celts and the Germanic tribes had a solstice tradition where a small tree would be brought into the home and showered with offerings (tinsel, jewelry, "ornaments") to honor the Spirit of the Forest. The tree serves as a sort of altar. There are other traditions also, Chuck. And, is there something *wrong* with honoring a deity which cares for the forests? Not at all. Are you comfortable "crowning" a tree? (with a special top ornament)? I am very comfortable with putting a decoration on the top of the tree. You may call it 'crowning', but it's not a term I've ever heard. As one of my friends, (a devout Christian but not a member of a mainstream sect), points out, there is nothing in the Bible that commands anybody to celebrate Christmas or even Easter. In fact, two of the four New Testament gospels don't even mention The Natvity, and you would think that hosts of angels descending from heaven wouldn't be such a trivial detail that it was accidentally overlooked. Have you read somewhere that all of the gospels in the New Testament must say exactly the same thing? No, but if they disagree it becomes a bit more difficult to accept every single sentence in the Bible as the literal word of God, doesn't it? Do they disagree about the birth of Christ? I thought you said that the Nativity wasn't mentioned. None of the good news in Iraq is mentioned in the major media, but that doesn't mean it's not happening. The Virgin Birth story was added about 150-200 AD. Specifically to allow Christianity to compete with the worship of Mithras. Funny thing, at least to me, is that the most important story in the New Testament has to be the Resurrection. (All four gospels mention that, right?). I would think that the Easter story is diminished in importance if Jesus were a supernatural being. IOW, "A supernatural being has the power to rise from the dead." Now, put forth the theory that a loving divinity makes it possible for common, garden-variety mortals to be saved, through faith, from death and achieve some sort of "eternal life" and you've actually got a bigger miracle to celebrate. Again, that's just my opinion. You're entitled to your opinion, and, as you say, that's just your opinion. Is there a religious passage somewhere that says, "Go thou, chop down a tree, bring it into your home, and make offereings unto it?" Nah, probably not. In fact, I sort of recall that Jehovah was might upset when some of his followers were venerating a golden calf. It ain't that far from a calf to a tree. Probably no passage saying same. So what? There is no passage saying, "Buy thyself a boat and cruise Puget Sound," You do it because you enjoy it. People put Christmas trees in their homes because they enjoy them. For many, decorating the tree is a family get-together time that is most enjoyable. And I have no problem with people putting up a tree. When I go boating, I don't pretend it's a religious observance. Neither should people putting up a tree, unless they practice a religion that venerates trees. Well gee! Thanks for not having a problem with my Christmas tree. The putting up of the tree is *part* of our observance of Christmas. I'm pretending nothing. And, the tree provides a centerpiece for the electric train going round and round its base. I guess the above met with your approval? No derogatory comments? Oh, and take a good close look at that holly and mistletoe while you're at it. :-) Holly provides a decorative touch on the fireplace mantel. Intermixed with candles, lights, and other decorations it adds to the Christmas cheer. This was OK also? Can anybody who considers Christmas a Christian and religious holiday offer a good explanation for the inculsion of a venerated tree? I'd be fascinated to see it attempted. http://www.christmasarchives.com/trees.html ...and because we like them. They provide a nice gathering spot for family and friends and for the opening of gifts on Christmas morning. Nothing wrong here either? It's a shame you miss out on one of the great pleasures of life - watching the grandchildren opening their presents by the Christmas tree. Have you ever watched your grandkids opening presents by the Christmas tree, Chuck? If not, you've missed out on a lot of joy. ' Chuckie is just displaying the typical arrogance of an liebral -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. Well, I see he didn't respond to the post. Liberalism.......The fear that somewhere, someone is having a good time. The goal of Liberalism.....To have everyone share equally in misery. -- John H MERRY CHRISTMAS! Wishing you the best as we celebrate the birth of our Lord, Jesus Christ. |
#50
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
We purchased a Holdiay tree today......................
John H. wrote: (You are one of the *very* few people I know that can state when Easter occurs. Congratulations. Must have been a good Catholic upbringing!) Nah. Merely an appreciation for the lunar calendar. :-) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
So where is...................... | General |