"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JIMinFL wrote:
Bush basher kicked off plane.
http://www.wesh.com/irresistible/5066135/detail.html
The woman was right; the airline was wrong.

In my opinion, the airline was correct in their decision to not allow the
woman on the flight. It's the airline's plane and it is privately owned.
In a public place, the woman should be allowed to wear whatever she wants to
wear.

Jim

Jim Carter wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JIMinFL wrote:
Bush basher kicked off plane.
http://www.wesh.com/irresistible/5066135/detail.html
The woman was right; the airline was wrong.

In my opinion, the airline was correct in their decision to not allow the
woman on the flight. It's the airline's plane and it is privately owned.
In a public place, the woman should be allowed to wear whatever she wants
to
wear.

Jim



Did you notice the survey results on the referenced web site? When I
checked it, 51% agreed with the airline, 49% agreed with the woman (out of
over 6,000 respondents).

What was the popular vote percentages of the last POTUS election? Sounds
familiar.

Eisboch

Eisboch wrote:
Did you notice the survey results on the referenced web site? When I
checked it, 51% agreed with the airline, 49% agreed with the woman (out of
over 6,000 respondents).

What was the popular vote percentages of the last POTUS election? Sounds
familiar.


Sounds like a mandate to boot the woman off the plane at 35,000 feet.

DSK

"DSK" wrote in message
...
Eisboch wrote:
Did you notice the survey results on the referenced web site? When I
checked it, 51% agreed with the airline, 49% agreed with the woman (out
of
over 6,000 respondents).

What was the popular vote percentages of the last POTUS election? Sounds
familiar.


Sounds like a mandate to boot the woman off the plane at 35,000 feet.

As long as you are pre-breathing O2 for one our before takeoff.

Does that include nothing?
"Jim Carter" wrote in message
...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
JIMinFL wrote:
Bush basher kicked off plane.
http://www.wesh.com/irresistible/5066135/detail.html
The woman was right; the airline was wrong.

In my opinion, the airline was correct in their decision to not allow the
woman on the flight. It's the airline's plane and it is privately owned.
In a public place, the woman should be allowed to wear whatever she wants
to
wear.

Jim

"JIMinFL" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Does that include nothing?

Yes it does! Well, that is if you live in Ontario Canada. It is not
illegal to appear nude, in public, in this province.

Jim in Canada.

JIm,
But I bet Air Canada would not allow one to fly nude.


"Jim Carter" wrote in message
.. .

"JIMinFL" wrote in message
hlink.net...
Does that include nothing?

Yes it does! Well, that is if you live in Ontario Canada. It is not
illegal to appear nude, in public, in this province.

Jim in Canada.

"Starbuck's Words of Wisdom" wrote in message
...
JIm,
But I bet Air Canada would not allow one to fly nude.

You would win the bet!

Jim

"JIMinFL" wrote in message
hlink.net...
In a public place, the woman should be allowed to wear whatever she wants
to
wear.

Jim




Does that include nothing?

Technically, that should be the case. Simple nudity should be considered as
nothing special, but there's no such thing as simple nudity. So the
practical answer should be no. Personally, I don't want to see most of us
naked in public; but that's just me.