"Gene Kearns" wrote in message
...
On 2 Oct 2005 17:01:50 -0700, wrote:


*JimH* wrote:
You have spread lies in this NG about me having a sockpuppet posting as
the
Skipper. I have told you repeated that is not true. Skipper's initial
post
about you was harsh and uncalled for. I have no bone to pick with you
to
have done such a thing. His posts also offered specifics that I was
never
privy to or aware of.

Yet you continue to spread the lie without offering any proof, just
suspicions.

You are the accuser yet I have to prove my innocence as you obviously
operate on the theory of guilty till proven innocent.

So how is this for proof Chuck?

Skippers IP address is: 68.102.254.136

Using http://www.geobytes.com/IpLocator.htm the address shows the user
is
located in Derby, Kansas. The old Skipper lived in Derby, Kansas. I
live
in Avon Lake, Ohio.

Skipper's ISP is cox.net. Cox.net does not provide service in Avon
Lake,
Ohio, nor does it in any of the suburbs surrounding Avon Lake.

Now for the real interesting part..........Skipper posted in the "Delay
has
been charged" thread on 9-28 at 4:10 pm. I posted in that thread on
9-28
at 4:14 pm. I guess I must be Superman to perform that feat.

I am sure you can further search the NG to find me posting during/near
the
times Skipper posted, but facts obviously do not concern you.

Please explain away these *facts* Chuck. Then offer an apology for
your
whopper of a lie about me.

Are you man enough Chuck?


I have stated that I suspect the current Skipper is a sock puppet. I
have stated that because the psuedo-Skipper posted in a very weird
style that I did not remember ever seeing before and the only time it
appeard again was when you used the *exact* same format and almost
*exactly* the same words in another attack post, I have drawn the
conclusion that you are the sock puppetmaster.

Chuck, I think you are, most likely, wrong. An analysis of headers
between the "real" Skipper of old and the new one leads me to believe
that this new one *is* likely a sock puppet, but is probably in the
Atlanta area. The IPs and the fact that it was to a cox.net address
gave me pause to accept that it *might* be the real Skipper.....


As far as ISP's, email addresses, etc etc etc etc etc go. Sorry, but
not impressed. There are any number of remailing programs and services
that people can use to disguise their identity and they have been
commonly used in rec.boats in the past. Not by you, as far as I know,
but it appears to be fairly easily accomplished when desired.


This recent poster has not, as yet, been able to post in a manner
geographically appropriate to the *real* Skipper. Additionally, he has
not recognized appropriate "hot buttons" that the real Skipper should
have reflexively responded to......


My take? It is a fake. It is a sock puppet. It is a smithers. It is
not Jim.

Again... if you want to know for sure, I can give you the *real*
Skipper's telephone number and/or the information indicating that
*this* "Skipper" is not in the correct geographic third of the
country....

--

_ ___c
\ _| \_
__\_| oooo \_____
~~~~|______________/ ~~~~~
~~~ ~~~~~~
~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~
~~~~ }((((o ~~~~~~ }{{{{o ~~~~~~~

Grady-White Gulfstream, out of Southport, NC.

http://myworkshop.idleplay.net/
Homepage*
http://www.thebayguide.com/rec.boats
Rec.boats at Lee Yeaton's Bayguide



Thank you Gene. I was hoping for someone to be able to sort this all out
beyond what I have already offered.

BTW: During a trace of the *Skipper* IP address it was traced to Atlanta a
couple of times, not Derby, KS. If you remember a certain person here from
the Atlanta area was quick to side with Chuck on his initial suspicions that
I was Skipper and continued to throw a shadow of suspicion that I was the
one.

The person posting as Skipper apparently has a long history here to be able
to know all the specifics brought out in the Skipper posts.

Oh, to be "On Lanier" again, eh Jim G?

And a certain person here did not deny he was in fact Jim Gallow when
confronted.

Smithers me this, Skipper me that. Gallow me......curious.

Could it be? ;-)

Now I am not making any specific allegations based on these curiosities as
the Chuckster is..........the proof will come out sooner or later. Either
way, the proof (beyond what I posted) will indeed show that the new
*Skipper* is not a JimH sock puppet.

Sorry Chuck.

BTW: Still awaiting an apology from you for continuing your whopper of a
lie.