"Frank Hopkins" wrote in message
nk.net...
Hi Frank,

If you are planning extensive offshore usage in anything but ideal weather
and conditions, you will want to re-think a Bayliner. Bayliners have a bad
reputation for hull failures in heavy water. (See N.T.S.B. sinking reports
at Coast Guard website.) Also, the boat is built with a lot of wood, which
rots eventually. This is why they are so cheap to get into. Bayliners also
depreciate very fast too. If budget is your primary motivation, you would
be
better off with a better quality used boat.

Capt. Frank Hopkins
www.home.earthlink.net/~aartworks

Can't find the sinking reports, got a link?

Glenn

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:37:52 -0400, "Glenn Deneweth"
wrote:

Can't find the sinking reports, got a link?

===================

http://www.uscgboating.org/statistic...stics_2000.pdf

On Mon, 19 Jul 2004 13:37:52 -0400, "Glenn Deneweth"
wrote:

Can't find the sinking reports, got a link?

===================

http://www.uscgboating.org/statistic...stics_2000.pdf


Still trying to find the statistics on the Coast Guard site, (reported by Capt.
Frank) establishing that Bayliner boats have a reputation for hull failures on
an open sea.

Scaning all 42 pages fom the link just furnished reveals *no* data broken down
by brand name.

On 19 Jul 2004 20:04:52 GMT, (Gould 0738) wrote:

Scaning all 42 pages fom the link just furnished reveals *no* data broken down
by brand name.

============================================

That's correct as I read it also. It does have statistics for
virtually every mode of accident and every type of boat however. If
one had access to the raw database instead of just the summary, I
suspect a breakdown by brand would be possible also, but apparently
they have chosen not to do that publicly. Too bad, it would be an
interesting but meaningless statistic.