Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
Now, *this* is a nice swerve. Let me clarify for you: What's dishonest is
the suggestion that the current BLS numbers are counting burger flipping as a manufacturing job. So, if you can stop calling me a "liar" for a moment, let's explore two important questions. 1) In light of the statements made in late Feb that the definition of manufacturing jobs should be expanded to include fast food workers, how do you *know* that there are no burger flipping jobs included in the report? Do you have a breakdown of the employees in the mfg category, by specific occupation? ((Don't overlook the fact that it was Bush who raised the question about adding burger flippers to the manufacturing jobs numbers, in the Presidents Economic Report. This isn't some DNC generated rumor, it's in writing in an official presidential document)) 2) If the current report does not include burger flippers in the manufacturing jobs section, what assurance do we have (again, in light of the President's own Economic Report) that they will not be included in the future? Has Bush publicly renounced his idea to include fast food workers in the manufacturing category? If so, I'd be eager to see a published report of his policy reversal. Let's not lose sight of one important fact here. We both agree that it would be dishonest to pump up the "manufacturing jobs" numbers by including mini wage burger flippers. Hypothetically; If you discovered Bush *had* pumped up the mfg jobs numbers by including fast food workers, would you defend his doing so? |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
Nevertheless, you said "burger flippers *WERE* reclassified as manufacturing
workers". That's a lie. See there. You believe the president even one time, (when he says that burger flipping is to be reclassified as a manufacturing job), and you're left swingin in the wind. Why do you suppose he said the administration was going to make the reclassification, if they did not? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
Gould 0738 wrote:
Now, *this* is a nice swerve. Let me clarify for you: What's dishonest is the suggestion that the current BLS numbers are counting burger flipping as a manufacturing job. So, if you can stop calling me a "liar" for a moment, let's explore two important questions. 1) In light of the statements made in late Feb that the definition of manufacturing jobs should be expanded to include fast food workers, how do you *know* that there are no burger flipping jobs included in the report? Do you have a breakdown of the employees in the mfg category, by specific occupation? ((Don't overlook the fact that it was Bush who raised the question about adding burger flippers to the manufacturing jobs numbers, in the Presidents Economic Report. This isn't some DNC generated rumor, it's in writing in an official presidential document)) 2) If the current report does not include burger flippers in the manufacturing jobs section, what assurance do we have (again, in light of the President's own Economic Report) that they will not be included in the future? Has Bush publicly renounced his idea to include fast food workers in the manufacturing category? If so, I'd be eager to see a published report of his policy reversal. Let's not lose sight of one important fact here. We both agree that it would be dishonest to pump up the "manufacturing jobs" numbers by including mini wage burger flippers. Hypothetically; If you discovered Bush *had* pumped up the mfg jobs numbers by including fast food workers, would you defend his doing so? A. It would be useful to know what kinds of jobs were added, and what they pay, and what benefits they include. B. It is worthwhile to point out that at best, by election, Bush will be less than even with the number of jobs added to the economy during the Clinton years. In other words, we still are not back where we were in the good old Clinton years. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Hypothetically; If you discovered Bush *had* pumped up the mfg jobs numbers by including fast food workers, would you defend his doing so? No. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
"Gould 0738" wrote in message ... Nevertheless, you said "burger flippers *WERE* reclassified as manufacturing workers". That's a lie. See there. You believe the president even one time, (when he says that burger flipping is to be reclassified as a manufacturing job), and you're left swingin in the wind. Why do you suppose he said the administration was going to make the reclassification, if they did not? I didn't read the Economic Report...only the commentary of liberal pundits. I'll read the report and give you my perspective...which I'm sure will be different from that of the liberal pundits. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
Gould 0738 wrote:
Nevertheless, you said "burger flippers *WERE* reclassified as manufacturing workers". That's a lie. See there. You believe the president even one time, (when he says that burger flipping is to be reclassified as a manufacturing job), and you're left swingin in the wind. Why do you suppose he said the administration was going to make the reclassification, if they did not? It is indisputable that the Bush Administration lies about almost everything. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: Now, *this* is a nice swerve. Let me clarify for you: What's dishonest is the suggestion that the current BLS numbers are counting burger flipping as a manufacturing job. So, if you can stop calling me a "liar" for a moment, let's explore two important questions. 1) In light of the statements made in late Feb that the definition of manufacturing jobs should be expanded to include fast food workers, how do you *know* that there are no burger flipping jobs included in the report? Do you have a breakdown of the employees in the mfg category, by specific occupation? ((Don't overlook the fact that it was Bush who raised the question about adding burger flippers to the manufacturing jobs numbers, in the Presidents Economic Report. This isn't some DNC generated rumor, it's in writing in an official presidential document)) 2) If the current report does not include burger flippers in the manufacturing jobs section, what assurance do we have (again, in light of the President's own Economic Report) that they will not be included in the future? Has Bush publicly renounced his idea to include fast food workers in the manufacturing category? If so, I'd be eager to see a published report of his policy reversal. Let's not lose sight of one important fact here. We both agree that it would be dishonest to pump up the "manufacturing jobs" numbers by including mini wage burger flippers. Hypothetically; If you discovered Bush *had* pumped up the mfg jobs numbers by including fast food workers, would you defend his doing so? A. It would be useful to know what kinds of jobs were added, and what they pay, and what benefits they include. It would be useful to know what kinds of jobs were lost in the preceding 3 years, and what they paid, and what benefits they included. B. It is worthwhile to point out that at best, by election, Bush will be less than even with the number of jobs added to the economy during the Clinton years. In other words, we still are not back where we were in the good old Clinton years. Oh, how quick your tone changes. I notice you're no longer spouting off about the "3 million jobs lost". Regardless, we'll have more jobs at the end of Bush's term than at any point during the Clinton years. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: Nevertheless, you said "burger flippers *WERE* reclassified as manufacturing workers". That's a lie. See there. You believe the president even one time, (when he says that burger flipping is to be reclassified as a manufacturing job), and you're left swingin in the wind. Why do you suppose he said the administration was going to make the reclassification, if they did not? It is indisputable that the Bush Administration lies about almost everything. I guess the old adage applies he it takes one to know one. I also guess that's why I don't see the lies that you claim Bush is telling. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
NOYB wrote:
"Harry Krause" wrote in message ... Gould 0738 wrote: Nevertheless, you said "burger flippers *WERE* reclassified as manufacturing workers". That's a lie. See there. You believe the president even one time, (when he says that burger flipping is to be reclassified as a manufacturing job), and you're left swingin in the wind. Why do you suppose he said the administration was going to make the reclassification, if they did not? It is indisputable that the Bush Administration lies about almost everything. I guess the old adage applies he it takes one to know one. I also guess that's why I don't see the lies that you claim Bush is telling. Of course you don't; you never will, no matter what. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
OT--Terrific employment news again
Hypothetically; If you discovered Bush *had* pumped up the mfg jobs
numbers by including fast food workers, would you defend his doing so? No. Good answer. :-) Now, do you have a list of the occupations included in the "mfg. jobs" section of the report you noted? I went to the bls website you referred to, and found a gazillion reports, files, etc etc etc going back many years. Can you offer a more definitive link that will demonstrate that in spite of the administration's stated intention to reclassify burger flipping as a manufacturing job, they have not, in fact, done so? (Or had not done so in the time period covered by the report?) I'd really like to be wrong on this one. It would be better all around if the administration wasn't pumping up the number of manufacturing jobs merely by expanding the number of job classifications defined as "manufacturing." |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bushites "Manipulate" News from Iraq | General | |||
Gotta fit this boat in garage, 3" to spare in width. Doable as a practical matter? | General |