On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's.

Looks like Iraq itself is the wmd and it's destroying Bush's plans on
a second term.

bb

bb wrote:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's.


Looks like Iraq itself is the wmd and it's destroying Bush's plans on
a second term.

bb


The perfect squelch. I don't know whether Bush's news conference last
night will have any long-term or even short term impact on the voters,
but it was a scary show. Not only did Bush come across as a guy who
couldn't even read off a teleprompter, he looked and sounded like a fish
out of water, gasping, for much of the news conference. And his absolute
refusal to apologize for anything and refusal to admit he might have
made a mistake somewhere along the way makes him look like an ignorant,
arrogant ass.

The hit of the week, though, has to be John Ashcroft's testimony...he
has many screws loose in that head. No wonder he was beaten by a dead man.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
bb wrote:

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:



Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's.


Looks like Iraq itself is the wmd and it's destroying Bush's plans on
a second term.

bb


The perfect squelch. I don't know whether Bush's news conference last
night will have any long-term or even short term impact on the voters,
but it was a scary show. Not only did Bush come across as a guy who
couldn't even read off a teleprompter, he looked and sounded like a fish
out of water, gasping, for much of the news conference. And his absolute
refusal to apologize for anything and refusal to admit he might have
made a mistake somewhere along the way makes him look like an ignorant,
arrogant ass.

The hit of the week, though, has to be John Ashcroft's testimony...he
has many screws loose in that head. No wonder he was beaten by a dead man.

He had nothing to apologize for. And the liberal media was pretty tough on
the guy...he did stumble at times but ended up answering every question.
Clinton would have ducked out after 5 minutes of hard questions, most likely
with a quivering lip and telling everyone he could feel their pain.

His message was consistent....we will stay in this till it is won.

And here is a clue for you....a great orator does not make a good president.
Einstein and Edison both shunned the media and stumbled when speaking.
Using your logic these were a couple of losers.

I bet you believe that "clothes make the person" also.

Such a shallow person you are.

jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

bb wrote:


On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:




Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's.


Looks like Iraq itself is the wmd and it's destroying Bush's plans on
a second term.

bb


The perfect squelch. I don't know whether Bush's news conference last
night will have any long-term or even short term impact on the voters,
but it was a scary show. Not only did Bush come across as a guy who
couldn't even read off a teleprompter, he looked and sounded like a fish
out of water, gasping, for much of the news conference. And his absolute
refusal to apologize for anything and refusal to admit he might have
made a mistake somewhere along the way makes him look like an ignorant,
arrogant ass.

The hit of the week, though, has to be John Ashcroft's testimony...he
has many screws loose in that head. No wonder he was beaten by a dead man.


He had nothing to apologize for. And the liberal media was pretty tough on
the guy...he did stumble at times but ended up answering every question.
Clinton would have ducked out after 5 minutes of hard questions, most likely
with a quivering lip and telling everyone he could feel their pain.

His message was consistent....we will stay in this till it is won.

And here is a clue for you....a great orator does not make a good president.
Einstein and Edison both shunned the media and stumbled when speaking.
Using your logic these were a couple of losers.


You really truly are dumb as dirt. Neither Edison nor Einstein went into
lines of work where oration was important. Stephen Hawking can't even
speak with the aid of a machine, yet no one thinks the less of him. It
isn't important that he speaks normally.

Bush is a politician, not a oood president. He is a terrible president.
And he can't speak very well, either.
=


I expect a president of the us to be able to speak competently in
public. Bush cannot.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

bb wrote:


On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:




Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's.


Looks like Iraq itself is the wmd and it's destroying Bush's plans on
a second term.

bb


The perfect squelch. I don't know whether Bush's news conference last
night will have any long-term or even short term impact on the voters,
but it was a scary show. Not only did Bush come across as a guy who
couldn't even read off a teleprompter, he looked and sounded like a fish
out of water, gasping, for much of the news conference. And his absolute
refusal to apologize for anything and refusal to admit he might have
made a mistake somewhere along the way makes him look like an ignorant,
arrogant ass.

The hit of the week, though, has to be John Ashcroft's testimony...he
has many screws loose in that head. No wonder he was beaten by a dead
man.


He had nothing to apologize for. And the liberal media was pretty tough
on
the guy...he did stumble at times but ended up answering every question.
Clinton would have ducked out after 5 minutes of hard questions, most
likely
with a quivering lip and telling everyone he could feel their pain.

His message was consistent....we will stay in this till it is won.

And here is a clue for you....a great orator does not make a good
president.
Einstein and Edison both shunned the media and stumbled when speaking.
Using your logic these were a couple of losers.


You really truly are dumb as dirt. Neither Edison nor Einstein went into
lines of work where oration was important. Stephen Hawking can't even
speak with the aid of a machine, yet no one thinks the less of him. It
isn't important that he speaks normally.

Bush is a politician, not a oood president. He is a terrible president.
And he can't speak very well, either.
=


I expect a president of the us to be able to speak competently in
public. Bush cannot.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
jim-- wrote:

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

bb wrote:


On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 22:09:35 GMT, "NOYB" wrote:




Don't worry Harry...we'll find the WMD's.


Looks like Iraq itself is the wmd and it's destroying Bush's plans on
a second term.

bb


The perfect squelch. I don't know whether Bush's news conference last
night will have any long-term or even short term impact on the voters,
but it was a scary show. Not only did Bush come across as a guy who
couldn't even read off a teleprompter, he looked and sounded like a fish
out of water, gasping, for much of the news conference. And his absolute
refusal to apologize for anything and refusal to admit he might have
made a mistake somewhere along the way makes him look like an ignorant,
arrogant ass.

The hit of the week, though, has to be John Ashcroft's testimony...he
has many screws loose in that head. No wonder he was beaten by a dead
man.


He had nothing to apologize for. And the liberal media was pretty tough
on
the guy...he did stumble at times but ended up answering every question.
Clinton would have ducked out after 5 minutes of hard questions, most
likely
with a quivering lip and telling everyone he could feel their pain.

His message was consistent....we will stay in this till it is won.

And here is a clue for you....a great orator does not make a good
president.
Einstein and Edison both shunned the media and stumbled when speaking.
Using your logic these were a couple of losers.


You really truly are dumb as dirt. Neither Edison nor Einstein went into
lines of work where oration was important. Stephen Hawking can't even
speak with the aid of a machine, yet no one thinks the less of him. It
isn't important that he speaks normally.

Bush is a politician, not a oood president. He is a terrible president.
And he can't speak very well, either.
=


I expect a president of the us to be able to speak competently in
public. Bush cannot.

The *point* escaped you, as expected.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Neither Edison nor Einstein went into
lines of work where oration was important.

No, but James Madison and Thomas Jefferson...two people generally considered
as poor speakers...did.



Stephen Hawking can't even
speak with the aid of a machine, yet no one thinks the less of him. It
isn't important that he speaks normally.

Bush is a politician, not a oood president. He is a terrible president.
And he can't speak very well, either.
=


I expect a president of the us to be able to speak competently in
public. Bush cannot.

I expect people to tell the truth. Your side cannot.

"NOYB" wrote in message
ink.net...

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...

Neither Edison nor Einstein went into
lines of work where oration was important.

No, but James Madison and Thomas Jefferson...two people generally
considered
as poor speakers...did.



Stephen Hawking can't even
speak with the aid of a machine, yet no one thinks the less of him. It
isn't important that he speaks normally.

Bush is a politician, not a oood president. He is a terrible president.
And he can't speak very well, either.
=


I expect a president of the us to be able to speak competently in
public. Bush cannot.

I expect people to tell the truth. Your side cannot.

Both sides have liars and thieves.

On Wed, 14 Apr 2004 18:43:21 -0400, "jim--" wrote:

And the liberal media was pretty tough on
the guy...he did stumble at times but ended up answering every question.

I must have missed his answer about his biggest mistake. What did he
finally come up with?

I have to say, on a personal basis, I felt sorry for Bush up there.
The guy was clearly out of his league. The unfortunate truth is this
is the guy supposedly leading our country and he's made a royal mess
out of everything he's touched, with the notable exception being tax
breaks for the wealthy.

bb.

"Harry Krause" wrote in message
...
No wonder he was beaten by a dead man.

The funny thing is...Carnahan's poll numbers didn't improve until after he
died. I guess voting for the guy was the political equivalent of a "pity
****".