Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
unbelivably, there is now NO funding for the Atlantic ICW. If this continures
there will soon be no ICW, it shall be impassable. If you care act now. go to http://www.atlintracoastal.org/index.htm, read the article, write you congressmen, fight for one of our few remaining freedoms. Sterling Kennedy |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Or, you could go outside?? That's REAL freedom.
IMO, only the commercial interests have any chance of convincing congress to continue to spend tax dollars on the ICW. Spending a huge amount of money for recreational use by a very small(relatively) number of perceived fat cat yacht owners is a very hard sell. I kinda sorta agree with the congress on this one. CUT SPENDING!!! Butch Sterling wrote: unbelivably, there is now NO funding for the Atlantic ICW. If this continures there will soon be no ICW, it shall be impassable. If you care act now. go to http://www.atlintracoastal.org/index.htm, read the article, write you congressmen, fight for one of our few remaining freedoms. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Subject: ICW may be shut down.
From: Spending a huge amount of money for recreational use by a very small(relatively) number of perceived fat cat yacht owners is a very hard sell. Subject: ICW may be shut down. From: "del cecchi" Why should the poor folks money be spent on recreation for the rich? Folks should pay their own way. I kinda sorta agree with the congress on this one. CUT SPENDING!!! You two really should get get a clue. The the so called "rich" folks who travel the ICW spend a LOT of money with the "poor" folks as they move up and down the ICW. In fact a lot of the "poor" folks have become "rich" over the years because of the ICW. If either of you had spent any time traveling on the ICW you would see just how much business is generated and has been created due to the ICW. My guess is that not funding the ICW would cost more in the taxes lost due to loss of business and employment then the money "saved" by cutting the money spent on ICW funding. Much like what happened with the luxury tax. Capt. Bill |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Florida Keyz wrote:
unbelivably, there is now NO funding for the Atlantic ICW. Actually, this isn't quite true. A small amount of money (a paltry few million) was allocated to Florida. .... If this continures there will soon be no ICW, it shall be impassable. Oh, I dunno, it will be there for a long time to come, it just will be "impassable" to boats over 3' draft. But the issue is a fairly serious one. The economic impact of the ICW includes a few billion doallars for commercial traffic, probably ten times that for recreational boaters. Think of all the marinas and gas docks and visitors centers along the ICW. Also, if there is little or no money for maintenance along the ICW, think what would be allocated for rescue of boaters trying to go outside around Cape Hattaras. Fresh Breezes- Doug King |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "DSK" wrote in message news ![]() Florida Keyz wrote: unbelivably, there is now NO funding for the Atlantic ICW. Actually, this isn't quite true. A small amount of money (a paltry few million) was allocated to Florida. .... If this continures there will soon be no ICW, it shall be impassable. Oh, I dunno, it will be there for a long time to come, it just will be "impassable" to boats over 3' draft. But the issue is a fairly serious one. The economic impact of the ICW includes a few billion doallars for commercial traffic, probably ten times that for recreational boaters. Think of all the marinas and gas docks and visitors centers along the ICW. Also, if there is little or no money for maintenance along the ICW, think what would be allocated for rescue of boaters trying to go outside around Cape Hattaras. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Maybe we should have tolls or permits or licences to use ICW? Collect from every boat. $50 for less than 20 feet, $250 for less than 28 feet, $1000 for 36 feet. Some appropriate price for commercial vessels. Add daily and weekly options and away you go. Why should the poor folks money be spent on recreation for the rich? Folks should pay their own way. del cecchi |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
del cecchi wrote:
Maybe we should have tolls or permits or licences to use ICW? Collect from every boat. $50 for less than 20 feet, $250 for less than 28 feet, $1000 for 36 feet. Some appropriate price for commercial vessels. Add daily and weekly options and away you go. Why should the poor folks money be spent on recreation for the rich? Folks should pay their own way. Well, we already do. If the fiscal burden of paying for the ICW is levied specifically on users, all other taxes should go down, right? The problem is that the gov't is already collecting the money and spending it on something else... now they have to go and collect more money. Check on the Wallop-Breaux fund, it's sources and disposition. Personally, I wouldn't mind paying a user fee for the ICW if that meant 1- it would actually be maintained to a consistent and reliable standard and 2- my fee also entailed a license to plunder anybody using the ICW who had dodged paying it. DSK |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DSK wrote:
Florida Keyz wrote: unbelivably, there is now NO funding for the Atlantic ICW. Actually, this isn't quite true. A small amount of money (a paltry few million) was allocated to Florida. .... If this continures there will soon be no ICW, it shall be impassable. Oh, I dunno, it will be there for a long time to come, it just will be "impassable" to boats over 3' draft. But the issue is a fairly serious one. The economic impact of the ICW includes a few billion doallars for commercial traffic, probably ten times that for recreational boaters. Think of all the marinas and gas docks and visitors centers along the ICW. Also, if there is little or no money for maintenance along the ICW, think what would be allocated for rescue of boaters trying to go outside around Cape Hattaras. Fresh Breezes- Doug King Major budgetary cutbacks are planned for all infrastructure, and I would include the ICW, along with bridges, roads, airports, subways, et cetera. This is all so we can "better sustain" more funds going to the Department of Defense for Bush's endless, mindless war, a war that will result in a more dangerous world than we live in now. Reuters had an interesting article on the problem recently: Bush Reaches Out to Conservatives to Quell Revolt Fri Feb 20, 3:45 PM ET By Adam Entous WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House has been reaching out to conservative groups to quell a rebellion over government spending and budget deficits, hoping to shore up President Bush's political base in an election year. Conservative leaders who have taken part in *private* White House meetings in recent weeks said on Friday officials have *promised to all but freeze non-defense spending,* and assured them Bush will follow through on his threat to veto major highway legislation if Congress refuses to scale it back. The price tag on a six-year highway and transportation bill stalled in the House of Representatives is $375 billion while a Senate highway bill calls for spending $318 billion. The White House has proposed a $256 billion measure. "Bush has been very attentive to the critique from the right," said Stephen Moore, president of the Club for Growth, a politically powerful conservative group -- offering tentative praise where once he talked openly of a brewing rebellion. But if the White House does not follow through, said Heritage Foundation vice president for government relations, Michael Franc, "all bets are off." |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Blah, blah, blah...... just how many boats, not yachts, transit the ICW for
anything more than a short cruise or fishing trip, EXCEPT FOR COMMERCIAL TRAFFIC? Reread my original post carefully, if you can read well. Think you can or could transit the Panama Canal for free? Why not? Butch |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I can't hardly believe you guys.
Your all talk and NO action. You are Turning this into a political discusioin while you may be loosing the icw! http://www.atlintracoastal.org/index.htm Follow the link I send, contact your congress, your senators, and your government. Spend 5 friggin dollars and join the Atlantic Intracoastal orginization. SH*t or get off the pot! or better said, Sh*t or stay off the ICW. Take Five miniutes of your valuable time and email them SOBs before its too late. And Butch, Stay off shore. Sail to the horizon if you wanna, but try an NOT use the ICW, see where you end up. Sterling http://floridakeys.homestead.com/Cruisingnotes.html |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A Dickens Christmas | General | |||
Emergency diesel shutdown | General |