Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott thinks:
=============== The link between the harm of uncontrolled fire and the extraction of money from the public is quite direct, and the risks are shared by all persons in the community equally because everyone is placed at risk by an uncontrolled fire. On the other hand, the link between one's private health care issues and some sort of overall public harm is extremely tenuous at best, and doesn't justify the forcible extraction of money from everyone in order to provide health care for some. The risks are not equal ================= United States spends about $35 billion per year to provide uninsured residents with medical care, often for preventable diseases or diseases that physicians could treat more efficiently with earlier diagnosis (Bloombert/Hartford Courant, 18 June 2003: "Hidden Costs, Value Lost: Uninsurance in America" "Earlier diagnosis"! What a unique concept. No! Wait! I believe it's one of those socialist (and Canadian) concepts. Even if we accept your lack of "overall harm" thesis (which I don't -- see Wolfgang's response to you), perhaps you'll be moved by the extent to which this affects your pocketbook.... frtzw906 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "BCITORGB" wrote in message ups.com... Scott thinks: =============== The link between the harm of uncontrolled fire and the extraction of money from the public is quite direct, and the risks are shared by all persons in the community equally because everyone is placed at risk by an uncontrolled fire. Nonsense Scott! I have my own firefighting equipment and can protect my own property and I'd never be responsible for starting an uncontrolled fire! Why should I have to pay because people like you are careless and can't take care of their own property! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote:
"BCITORGB" wrote in message ups.com... Scott thinks: =============== The link between the harm of uncontrolled fire and the extraction of money from the public is quite direct, and the risks are shared by all persons in the community equally because everyone is placed at risk by an uncontrolled fire. Nonsense Scott! I have my own firefighting equipment and can protect my own property and I'd never be responsible for starting an uncontrolled fire! Why should I have to pay because people like you are careless and can't take care of their own property! I do too. Several thousands of dollars worth, in fact. However, most people don't, and don't have the skills required to effectively fight a fire even if they do. Also, they may not be around when a fire starts and therefore will not be able to douse the fire before others are harmed. Thus, it is reasonable and prudent to maintain a cadre of properly trained and equipped personnel at public expense. -- Regards, Scott Weiser "I love the Internet, I no longer have to depend on friends, family and co-workers, I can annoy people WORLDWIDE!" TM © 2005 Scott Weiser |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Scott Weiser" wrote in message ... A Usenet persona calling itself KMAN wrote: "BCITORGB" wrote in message ups.com... Scott thinks: =============== The link between the harm of uncontrolled fire and the extraction of money from the public is quite direct, and the risks are shared by all persons in the community equally because everyone is placed at risk by an uncontrolled fire. Nonsense Scott! I have my own firefighting equipment and can protect my own property and I'd never be responsible for starting an uncontrolled fire! Why should I have to pay because people like you are careless and can't take care of their own property! I do too. Several thousands of dollars worth, in fact. However, most people don't, and don't have the skills required to effectively fight a fire even if they do. Also, they may not be around when a fire starts and therefore will not be able to douse the fire before others are harmed. Thus, it is reasonable and prudent to maintain a cadre of properly trained and equipped personnel at public expense. No way! Why should I have to pay for it! I also have people hired to protect my property 24 hours a day. I don't need the public fire department service! I should be able to opt out! You commie! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
OT Bush propaganda against Kerry | General | |||
Bush fiddles while health care burns | General | |||
OT- Ode to Immigration | General | |||
OT-Think government-controlled health coverage will work? Think again! | General |