![]() |
"Larry Cable" wrote in message ... "riverman" typed in Message-ID: These guys all have low immigration, and very homogenous populations. I got no bone to pick with the rest of your post. :-) --riverman Alright, let me qualify that remark. In industrialized nations, countries with low immigration tend to have lower infant mortality. Happy now :^). Hey, I'm ALWAYS happy talking to you, Larry! :-) And I think I know what you are meaning to imply: that homogenous populations have lower infant mortality rates when compared to their peer countries. And the implication might be that something about compatability in the gene pool and the absence of 'exotic' or imported diseases, but in actuality, I would also expect certain recessive genetic diseases to be more expressed in a homogenous genepool. I think you gotta look deep and find some supporting literature for your statement, because I'm not so sure its true. Here are the lowest 20 infant mortality countries: 1.Japan 3.30deaths/1,000 live births 2.Sweden 3.42deaths/1,000 live births 3.Iceland 3.50deaths/1,000 live births 4.Singapore 3.57deaths/1,000 live births 5.Finland 3.73deaths/1,000 live births 6.Norway 3.87deaths/1,000 live births 7.Andorra 4.06deaths/1,000 live births 8.Germany 4.23deaths/1,000 live births 9.Netherlands 4.26deaths/1,000 live births 10.Austria 4.33deaths/1,000 live births 11.Switzerland 4.36deaths/1,000 live births 12.France 4.37deaths/1,000 live births 13.Macau 4.42deaths/1,000 live births 14.Slovenia 4.42deaths/1,000 live births 15.Spain 4.54deaths/1,000 live births 16.Belgium 4.57deaths/1,000 live births 17.Luxembourg 4.65deaths/1,000 live births 18.Australia 4.83deaths/1,000 live births 19.Liechtenstein 4.85deaths/1,000 live births 20.Canada 4.88deaths/1,000 live births Without a doubt, they are almost all 'developed' countries. But notice: Singapore has the second highest immigration rate in the world, and its on the list with the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. Of the others, its difficult to find immigration rates in table form, but there are several sites that underscore that European countries have some of the highest immigration rates in the world, and they have the lowest infant mortality rates. I know its not exactly what you are saying, but I don't see evidence to support that there is any strong connection between immigration rates and infant mortality. Sorry. --riverman |
On 25-Nov-2004, "riverman" wrote:
20.Canada 4.88deaths/1,000 live births Without a doubt, they are almost all 'developed' countries. But notice: Singapore has the second highest immigration rate in the world, Canada's population growth is almost entirely due to immigration. Over 50% of Toronto's population was born overseas. You're correct, while there are some countries that fit Larry's criteria, there are others that do not. Given the similarities in the US and Canada's economic status and cultures, comparing these two should give an indication that there's a problem in the US. Mike |
|
I will continue working on understanding who you are and why you made the
type of arrival in rbp as you did, as that will certainly underscore the nature of our online relationship. But if you truly want to be a welcome contributor here, and more importantly, if you truly want to be a recipient of the wealth of info, insights, knowledge and camaraderie that is available here, you will listen to what Wilko, myself, and others are telling you. Respectfully, and with all sincerity: --riverman riverman, I was glad to hear from you, and that you are willing to continue working on understanding who I am. I too, am working on getting to know you all better as well. At Wilko's encouragement, I did some searching on Dave Van, and have gotten to know his board history, a little better as well, and his last name. Sounds like he started posting back in 2000, after getting into kayaking. His initiation was when out for a walk, he saw a kayaker on a river in Chicago, and as they say, the rest was history. Now that does not mean, that I know him, nor that we are friends, but that we have common interest. It is as we share that common interest, and get to know each other better, that we could even become good friends. Matter of fact, what I hear is that he got a Kodiak, which from the discussion, would fit my 6'2, 275 lbs, size 12 shoe, so I will keep my eyes open for a used one to try out. Friendship, to me is like an open door, you don't just walk in, but knock first, and you may get a cup of coffee! But if the word seems too familiar for you to feel comfortable, I can use the word penpal. I have found our penpal relationsip already enlightening and educational. Your international perspective is appreciated, and your concerns regarding the environment are eye opening. I have already been reading more, than I have read for a long time. It is not the only world concern, but certainly a big one. When I first came to this board, for info, I did not come expecting friendship, or even an International penpal. If in barging in, I jumped into a family squabble, that at the time was none of my concern, I quickly and sincerely apologize. However, I understood that the board is an open public affair, and the rules of engagement seemed quite clear. So I engaged. Now as I have gotten to know all of you a little better, and you know me, I would look forward to being friends someday. And though I am not really that much of a coffee drinker, I use the analogy to let you know the pot is always hot. If in town, I would glad to set down together, and if from the Congo, your discussion is always welcome. As an Educator, you are probably familiar with the Meyers-Briggs Personality Profile. When tested, I scored in the 98% as an ENTP. One outstanding and well known ENTP was General Patton. You might not have liked his politics, style, or his personality, but one thing about him, you knew where he stood, and maybe not where he was going. But you knew not to stand in his way. Sound familiar! As far as the SuperGuru stuff, I actually prefer "riverman", so riverman it is. I do not doubt your river experience, and certainly entertain your insight and philosophy. In researching Dave Van, I came across this quote: riverman wrote: And yet another tongue-in-cheek definition of technology is "stuff that didn't exist when you were a kid", and in that vein...who needs it? :-) --riverman Life tends to get to complicated, and that is part of what is appealing about paddling. It is basically done the same now, as for thousands of years. But then there is always something new to learn, have to have gear, and the hot spots to explore. But then isn't that what life is about as well. I have generally tried to distance myself from political discussions, since in the late 60's when I was involved, and got burned. I was a student, at Colo Sch of Mines, in 68-69. A classmate of mine, by the name of Bill Schroeder, was a nice all American boy, was on an ROTC scholarship. He was nice, but headed into the military and Vietnam. I was on the other side, protesting the war. So though we were classmates, we were on opposite sides and our paths did not cross all that often, and I didn't really know him very well. Then in 1970, he transfered from CSM, to KSU. He is now best known as one of the four students killed at Kent State University on May 4,1970. I had many other classmates who went to Vietnam, to fight and die, for JFK, and LBJ. It was their war, not mine! Then along came Nixson, and he promised and delivered, and eventually got us out of Vietnam. Yeah there was Cambodia, and Loas, and we can discuss Nixons involving us there, and POW-MIA, etc. But he finally brought the troops home, and I was tired of it all, and just wanted to become part of the silent majority. Not a political activist, not an environmentalist, just silent and secure, protected by the Conservatives who at least do what they say, instead of the Liberals who sing about making peace, and yet took us into one of the longest dark periods of American history, which has been throughly hashed so I won't go there. Eventually we get to where we are today, and I (as a member of the silent majority) have to make a decision of who I trust more to conduct a war. Based on my past experience, I felt more comfortable with the Conservative. Then in my silent security, I am cruising around on the internet checking out discussion groups about paddling, and I come across your post. I had a rather visceral reaction that not only surprised myself, but my wife, and you who were at the receiving end. Long latent feelings and energy were stirred up, when I heard the discussion putting down Bush. My security was being threatened by a perceived threat, from enemies at home and abroad. So I fought back. I apologize if I blind-sided you, just know that I have this reflex response to threat. So I am learning about you all, and you about me, and me about myself. There are others much more informed about the issues than I. I do not even pretend to know all the issues, but I will not let challenges go unchallenged either. ENTPs dont have to have all the facts to go off half-cocked! That our dark side. So about that cup of coffee, the door is open, the welcome sign out, and the pots hot! and oh yeah Dave, I was glad to get to know more about you, and your paddling history. Especially special about walking with your daughter. Enjoy and cherish those moments, of Life!!! Respectfully, Tinkerntom, aka KnesisKnosis, Life, Live it! |
in article , rick etter at
wrote on 11/25/04 4:48 PM: "Keenan Wellar" wrote in message news:BDCAD48B.12669%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com... in article et, rick etter at wrote on 11/24/04 11:02 PM: "Keenan Wellar" wrote in message news:BDCAAD29.1265C%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com... in article t, rick etter at wrote on 11/24/04 9:17 PM: "Keenan Wellar" wrote in message news:BDCA9664.12630%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com... in article G09pd.15037$Gw.11523@trndny09, No Spam at wrote on 11/24/04 6:43 PM: Well that is where we will have to agree to disagree. I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing. I would really like to understand how George W Bush could be less evil than John Kerry. I mean, I watch George with one of his little speeches where he makes an obnoxious statement and then goes "heh heh heh" with that evil grin....it just gives me the willies! ==================== But a self-confessed war criminal doesn't phase you at all? Quite a selective set of knee-jerks you have there, eh? You mean because Kerry was a soldier in Vietnam? ===================== No, stupid, because he admitted to participating in, and performing *war crimes*. Did you miss that little part of his sordid past, or were you just determined to not hear anything contrary to the 'good feelings' he gave you? Yes, I'm aware. The entire US fiasco in Vietnam was a war crime. ===================== No, fool. I'm talking on a personal level. *He* phisically participated and admitted to performing acts that were war crimes with his own hands. Not all in Vietnam could say that. The entire American adventure in Vietnam was a war crime. Young Americans, including John Kerry, were sent there to kill people, many of them innocent civilians. That you continue to support a self-admitted war criminal is what is creepy. That you can't understand - or choose not to understand - the context is what is scary and creepy. At least 49% of Americans who voted in the last election didn't have the same problem, and I doubt many of the remaining 51% had a problem figuring it out either. He's honest. I know, that's not very presidential. ================= ROTFLMAO Honest? What a hoot! Dodge noted. |
in article , Tinkerntom at
wrote on 11/25/04 7:42 PM: As an Educator, you are probably familiar with the Meyers-Briggs Personality Profile. When tested, I scored in the 98% as an ENTP. One outstanding and well known ENTP was General Patton. You might not have liked his politics, style, or his personality, but one thing about him, you knew where he stood, and maybe not where he was going. But you knew not to stand in his way. Sound familiar! He was a very bitter and unstable individual. Are those the characteristics you are referring to? Because, clearly, you aren't all that bitter. |
Of the others, its
difficult to find immigration rates in table form, but there are several sites that underscore that European countries have some of the highest immigration rates in the world, and they have the lowest infant mortality rates. I know its not exactly what you are saying, but I don't see evidence to support that there is any strong connection between immigration rates and infant mortality. Sorry. Immigrant populations in the US tend to be at the bottom of the economic scale, tend to come from backgrounds that did not have ready access to health care and have a language barrier that often inhibits them from seeking care. Early pregnancies, smoking, and alcohol use may be a factor. In the US, one might even have to include the out migrants from the economically depressed regions like Appalachia. What I'm implying is that industrial societies that have stable and intergrated (as in a functioning part of the culture) populations seem to have lower rates of infant mortality. Although statistically, there isn't a lot of difference in most of the top 50. SYOTR Larry C. |
|
Keenan Wellar wrote in message news:BDCBF592.12717%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@h otmail.com...
in article , Tinkerntom at wrote on 11/25/04 7:42 PM: As an Educator, you are probably familiar with the Meyers-Briggs Personality Profile. When tested, I scored in the 98% as an ENTP. One outstanding and well known ENTP was General Patton. You might not have liked his politics, style, or his personality, but one thing about him, you knew where he stood, and maybe not where he was going. But you knew not to stand in his way. Sound familiar! He was a very bitter and unstable individual. Are those the characteristics you are referring to? Because, clearly, you aren't all that bitter. Keenan, it is encouraging that you do not perceive me as being bitter! Though you say nothing about unstable. As a kayaker, you understand the necessity of stability, especially secondary;) I understand that you were primarily speaking of Patton, who very well may have been bitter and unstable. As an ENTP, his Extravert side could have turned very negetive when taken out of the loop of significance, that he had enjoyed during the war. Extroverts like to be near the center of activity. If you are interested, a couple of web sites with relevant info. http://www.unspun.us/archives/000118.html http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~bustcfj/cjmeyers.html Many more available, google "Meyers-Briggs" ENTP Thanks for asking, Tinkerntom, aka Knesisknosis, Life, Live it. BTW, as a good ENTP, I had written a rather lengthy thesis to your simple question (Surprise, Surprise), and then Being a Good ENTP, and not paying attention to all the facts, I pushed the wrong button and canceled it! instead of the post button. Probably was meant to be. TNT |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com