BoatBanter.com

BoatBanter.com (https://www.boatbanter.com/)
-   General (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/)
-   -   Enjoy the wild places while they last (https://www.boatbanter.com/general/24766-enjoy-wild-places-while-they-last.html)

rick etter November 25th 04 09:48 PM


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in message
news:BDCAD48B.12669%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com...
in article et, rick
etter
at wrote on 11/24/04 11:02 PM:


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in
message
news:BDCAAD29.1265C%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com...
in article t, rick
etter
at
wrote on 11/24/04 9:17 PM:


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in
message
news:BDCA9664.12630%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com...
in article G09pd.15037$Gw.11523@trndny09, No Spam at
wrote on 11/24/04 6:43 PM:

Well that is where we will have to agree to disagree.

I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing. I would really like to understand
how
George W Bush could be less evil than John Kerry. I mean, I watch
George
with one of his little speeches where he makes an obnoxious statement
and
then goes "heh heh heh" with that evil grin....it just gives me the
willies!
====================
But a self-confessed war criminal doesn't phase you at all? Quite a
selective set of knee-jerks you have there, eh?

You mean because Kerry was a soldier in Vietnam?

=====================
No, stupid, because he admitted to participating in, and performing *war
crimes*. Did you miss that little part of his sordid past, or were you
just determined to not hear anything contrary to the 'good feelings' he
gave
you?


Yes, I'm aware. The entire US fiasco in Vietnam was a war crime.

=====================
No, fool. I'm talking on a personal level. *He* phisically participated
and admitted to performing acts that were war crimes with his own hands.
Not all in Vietnam could say that. That you continue to support a
self-admitted war criminal is what is creepy.


He's
honest. I know, that's not very presidential.

=================
ROTFLMAO Honest? What a hoot!



And he didn't give me "good feelings" actually. He's not very good at
that.
That makes him not very electable.

You really think that
equates to making Presidential decisions? It's particularly ironic
considering what Bush was doing while Kerry was in Vietnam.

==================
Pray tell, what would that have been, fool?


Fooling around mostly, yes.

=================
Dodge noted.






riverman November 25th 04 10:40 PM


"Larry Cable" wrote in message
...
"riverman"


typed in Message-ID:

These guys all have low immigration, and very homogenous populations.

I got no bone to pick with the rest of your post. :-)

--riverman


Alright, let me qualify that remark. In industrialized nations, countries
with
low immigration tend to have lower infant mortality. Happy now :^).


Hey, I'm ALWAYS happy talking to you, Larry! :-)

And I think I know what you are meaning to imply: that homogenous
populations have lower infant mortality rates when compared to their peer
countries. And the implication might be that something about compatability
in the gene pool and the absence of 'exotic' or imported diseases, but in
actuality, I would also expect certain recessive genetic diseases to be more
expressed in a homogenous genepool. I think you gotta look deep and find
some supporting literature for your statement, because I'm not so sure its
true.

Here are the lowest 20 infant mortality countries:

1.Japan 3.30deaths/1,000 live births
2.Sweden 3.42deaths/1,000 live births
3.Iceland 3.50deaths/1,000 live births
4.Singapore 3.57deaths/1,000 live births
5.Finland 3.73deaths/1,000 live births
6.Norway 3.87deaths/1,000 live births
7.Andorra 4.06deaths/1,000 live births
8.Germany 4.23deaths/1,000 live births
9.Netherlands 4.26deaths/1,000 live births
10.Austria 4.33deaths/1,000 live births
11.Switzerland 4.36deaths/1,000 live births
12.France 4.37deaths/1,000 live births
13.Macau 4.42deaths/1,000 live births
14.Slovenia 4.42deaths/1,000 live births
15.Spain 4.54deaths/1,000 live births
16.Belgium 4.57deaths/1,000 live births
17.Luxembourg 4.65deaths/1,000 live births
18.Australia 4.83deaths/1,000 live births
19.Liechtenstein 4.85deaths/1,000 live births
20.Canada 4.88deaths/1,000 live births


Without a doubt, they are almost all 'developed' countries. But notice:
Singapore has the second highest immigration rate in the world, and its on
the list with the 4th lowest infant mortality rate. Of the others, its
difficult to find immigration rates in table form, but there are several
sites that underscore that European countries have some of the highest
immigration rates in the world, and they have the lowest infant mortality
rates. I know its not exactly what you are saying, but I don't see evidence
to support that there is any strong connection between immigration rates and
infant mortality. Sorry.

--riverman



Michael Daly November 25th 04 11:29 PM

On 25-Nov-2004, "riverman" wrote:

20.Canada 4.88deaths/1,000 live births


Without a doubt, they are almost all 'developed' countries. But notice:
Singapore has the second highest immigration rate in the world,


Canada's population growth is almost entirely due to immigration.
Over 50% of Toronto's population was born overseas. You're correct,
while there are some countries that fit Larry's criteria, there are
others that do not. Given the similarities in the US and Canada's
economic status and cultures, comparing these two should give an
indication that there's a problem in the US.

Mike

Michael Daly November 25th 04 11:35 PM

On 25-Nov-2004, ospam (Larry Cable) wrote:

Would a
doctor in Canada spend thousands or tens of thousands to extend the life of a
terminally ill patient? If they do ration health care, is this one of the
areas that they save? Remember, here they spend hundreds of thousands to give
liver transplants to 70 year old alcoholics.


That depends on the doctor. There are many examples of outrageous amounts
of $$ spent on terminally ill patients and others of patients being talked
into simpler treatments and special care to the end. I don't know of any
stats to back an assumption of either being dominant.

Mike

Tinkerntom November 26th 04 12:42 AM

I will continue working on understanding who you are and why you made the
type of arrival in rbp as you did, as that will certainly underscore the
nature of our online relationship. But if you truly want to be a welcome
contributor here, and more importantly, if you truly want to be a recipient
of the wealth of info, insights, knowledge and camaraderie that is available
here, you will listen to what Wilko, myself, and others are telling you.

Respectfully, and with all sincerity:
--riverman


riverman, I was glad to hear from you, and that you are willing to
continue working on understanding who I am. I too, am working on
getting to know you all better as well.

At Wilko's encouragement, I did some searching on Dave Van, and have
gotten to know his board history, a little better as well, and his
last name. Sounds like he started posting back in 2000, after getting
into kayaking. His initiation was when out for a walk, he saw a
kayaker on a river in Chicago, and as they say, the rest was history.

Now that does not mean, that I know him, nor that we are friends, but
that we have common interest. It is as we share that common interest,
and get to know each other better, that we could even become good
friends. Matter of fact, what I hear is that he got a Kodiak, which
from the discussion, would fit my 6'2, 275 lbs, size 12 shoe, so I
will keep my eyes open for a used one to try out.

Friendship, to me is like an open door, you don't just walk in, but
knock first, and you may get a cup of coffee! But if the word seems
too familiar for you to feel comfortable, I can use the word penpal. I
have found our penpal relationsip already enlightening and
educational. Your international perspective is appreciated, and your
concerns regarding the environment are eye opening. I have already
been reading more, than I have read for a long time. It is not the
only world concern, but certainly a big one.

When I first came to this board, for info, I did not come expecting
friendship, or even an International penpal. If in barging in, I
jumped into a family squabble, that at the time was none of my
concern, I quickly and sincerely apologize. However, I understood that
the board is an open public affair, and the rules of engagement seemed
quite clear. So I engaged.

Now as I have gotten to know all of you a little better, and you know
me, I would look forward to being friends someday. And though I am not
really that much of a coffee drinker, I use the analogy to let you
know the pot is always hot. If in town, I would glad to set down
together, and if from the Congo, your discussion is always welcome.

As an Educator, you are probably familiar with the Meyers-Briggs
Personality Profile. When tested, I scored in the 98% as an ENTP. One
outstanding and well known ENTP was General Patton. You might not have
liked his politics, style, or his personality, but one thing about
him, you knew where he stood, and maybe not where he was going. But
you knew not to stand in his way. Sound familiar!

As far as the SuperGuru stuff, I actually prefer "riverman", so
riverman it is. I do not doubt your river experience, and certainly
entertain your insight and philosophy. In researching Dave Van, I came
across this quote:

riverman wrote:

And yet another tongue-in-cheek definition of technology is "stuff

that
didn't exist when you were a kid", and in that vein...who needs it?

:-)

--riverman


Life tends to get to complicated, and that is part of what is
appealing about paddling. It is basically done the same now, as for
thousands of years. But then there is always something new to learn,
have to have gear, and the hot spots to explore. But then isn't that
what life is about as well.

I have generally tried to distance myself from political discussions,
since in the late 60's when I was involved, and got burned. I was a
student, at Colo Sch of Mines, in 68-69. A classmate of mine, by the
name of Bill Schroeder, was a nice all American boy, was on an ROTC
scholarship. He was nice, but headed into the military and Vietnam. I
was on the other side, protesting the war. So though we were
classmates, we were on opposite sides and our paths did not cross all
that often, and I didn't really know him very well. Then in 1970, he
transfered from CSM, to KSU. He is now best known as one of the four
students killed at Kent State University on May 4,1970.

I had many other classmates who went to Vietnam, to fight and die, for
JFK, and LBJ. It was their war, not mine! Then along came Nixson, and
he promised and delivered, and eventually got us out of Vietnam. Yeah
there was Cambodia, and Loas, and we can discuss Nixons involving us
there, and POW-MIA, etc. But he finally brought the troops home, and I
was tired of it all, and just wanted to become part of the silent
majority. Not a political activist, not an environmentalist, just
silent and secure, protected by the Conservatives who at least do what
they say, instead of the Liberals who sing about making peace, and yet
took us into one of the longest dark periods of American history,
which has been throughly hashed so I won't go there.

Eventually we get to where we are today, and I (as a member of the
silent majority) have to make a decision of who I trust more to
conduct a war. Based on my past experience, I felt more comfortable
with the Conservative.

Then in my silent security, I am cruising around on the internet
checking out discussion groups about paddling, and I come across your
post. I had a rather visceral reaction that not only surprised myself,
but my wife, and you who were at the receiving end. Long latent
feelings and energy were stirred up, when I heard the discussion
putting down Bush. My security was being threatened by a perceived
threat, from enemies at home and abroad. So I fought back. I apologize
if I blind-sided you, just know that I have this reflex response to
threat.

So I am learning about you all, and you about me, and me about myself.
There are others much more informed about the issues than I. I do not
even pretend to know all the issues, but I will not let challenges go
unchallenged either. ENTPs dont have to have all the facts to go off
half-cocked! That our dark side.

So about that cup of coffee, the door is open, the welcome sign out,
and the pots hot! and oh yeah Dave, I was glad to get to know more
about you, and your paddling history. Especially special about walking
with your daughter. Enjoy and cherish those moments, of Life!!!

Respectfully, Tinkerntom, aka KnesisKnosis, Life, Live it!

Keenan Wellar November 26th 04 01:44 AM

in article , rick etter at
wrote on 11/25/04 4:48 PM:


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in message
news:BDCAD48B.12669%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com...
in article et, rick
etter
at
wrote on 11/24/04 11:02 PM:


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in
message
news:BDCAAD29.1265C%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com...
in article t, rick
etter
at
wrote on 11/24/04 9:17 PM:


"Keenan Wellar" wrote in
message
news:BDCA9664.12630%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@ho tmail.com...
in article G09pd.15037$Gw.11523@trndny09, No Spam at
wrote on 11/24/04 6:43 PM:

Well that is where we will have to agree to disagree.

I wasn't agreeing or disagreeing. I would really like to understand
how
George W Bush could be less evil than John Kerry. I mean, I watch
George
with one of his little speeches where he makes an obnoxious statement
and
then goes "heh heh heh" with that evil grin....it just gives me the
willies!
====================
But a self-confessed war criminal doesn't phase you at all? Quite a
selective set of knee-jerks you have there, eh?

You mean because Kerry was a soldier in Vietnam?
=====================
No, stupid, because he admitted to participating in, and performing *war
crimes*. Did you miss that little part of his sordid past, or were you
just determined to not hear anything contrary to the 'good feelings' he
gave
you?


Yes, I'm aware. The entire US fiasco in Vietnam was a war crime.

=====================
No, fool. I'm talking on a personal level. *He* phisically participated
and admitted to performing acts that were war crimes with his own hands.
Not all in Vietnam could say that.


The entire American adventure in Vietnam was a war crime. Young Americans,
including John Kerry, were sent there to kill people, many of them innocent
civilians.

That you continue to support a
self-admitted war criminal is what is creepy.


That you can't understand - or choose not to understand - the context is
what is scary and creepy. At least 49% of Americans who voted in the last
election didn't have the same problem, and I doubt many of the remaining 51%
had a problem figuring it out either.

He's
honest. I know, that's not very presidential.

=================
ROTFLMAO Honest? What a hoot!


Dodge noted.



Keenan Wellar November 26th 04 01:48 AM

in article , Tinkerntom at
wrote on 11/25/04 7:42 PM:

As an Educator, you are probably familiar with the Meyers-Briggs
Personality Profile. When tested, I scored in the 98% as an ENTP. One
outstanding and well known ENTP was General Patton. You might not have
liked his politics, style, or his personality, but one thing about
him, you knew where he stood, and maybe not where he was going. But
you knew not to stand in his way. Sound familiar!


He was a very bitter and unstable individual. Are those the characteristics
you are referring to? Because, clearly, you aren't all that bitter.


Larry Cable November 26th 04 03:00 AM

Of the others, its
difficult to find immigration rates in table form, but there are several
sites that underscore that European countries have some of the highest
immigration rates in the world, and they have the lowest infant mortality
rates. I know its not exactly what


you are saying, but I don't see evidence
to support that there is any strong connection between immigration rates and
infant mortality. Sorry.


Immigrant populations in the US tend to be at the bottom of the economic scale,
tend to come from backgrounds that did not have ready access to health care
and have a language barrier that often inhibits them from seeking care. Early
pregnancies, smoking, and alcohol use may be a factor.

In the US, one might even have to include the out migrants from the
economically depressed regions like Appalachia.

What I'm implying is that industrial societies that have stable and intergrated
(as in a functioning part of the culture) populations seem to have lower rates
of infant mortality. Although statistically, there isn't a lot of difference in
most of the top 50.
SYOTR
Larry C.

Larry Cable November 26th 04 03:03 AM

Michael Daly"

Canada's population growth is almost entirely due to immigration.
Over 50% of Toronto's population was born overseas. You're correct,
while there are some countries that fit Larry's criteria, there are
others that do not. Given the similarities in the US and Canada's
economic status and cultures, comparing these two should give an
indication that there's a problem in the US.

Mike



Might be important to look at where the immigrants are coming from and what
their economic status is when they arrive. Much of the immigration in the US
comes from Latin America and the Caribean Islands and is often the poor seeking
manual labor in the US. A good portion of it is illegals.


SYOTR
Larry C.

Tinkerntom November 26th 04 09:01 AM

Keenan Wellar wrote in message news:BDCBF592.12717%UseAddressOnWebPageProvided@h otmail.com...
in article , Tinkerntom at
wrote on 11/25/04 7:42 PM:

As an Educator, you are probably familiar with the Meyers-Briggs
Personality Profile. When tested, I scored in the 98% as an ENTP. One
outstanding and well known ENTP was General Patton. You might not have
liked his politics, style, or his personality, but one thing about
him, you knew where he stood, and maybe not where he was going. But
you knew not to stand in his way. Sound familiar!


He was a very bitter and unstable individual. Are those the characteristics
you are referring to? Because, clearly, you aren't all that bitter.


Keenan, it is encouraging that you do not perceive me as being bitter!
Though you say nothing about unstable. As a kayaker, you understand
the necessity of stability, especially secondary;)

I understand that you were primarily speaking of Patton, who very well
may have been bitter and unstable. As an ENTP, his Extravert side
could have turned very negetive when taken out of the loop of
significance, that he had enjoyed during the war. Extroverts like to
be near the center of activity.

If you are interested, a couple of web sites with relevant info.

http://www.unspun.us/archives/000118.html

http://www.brunel.ac.uk/~bustcfj/cjmeyers.html

Many more available, google "Meyers-Briggs" ENTP

Thanks for asking, Tinkerntom, aka Knesisknosis, Life, Live it.


BTW, as a good ENTP, I had written a rather lengthy thesis to your
simple question (Surprise, Surprise), and then Being a Good ENTP, and
not paying attention to all the facts, I pushed the wrong button and
canceled it! instead of the post button. Probably was meant to be.
TNT


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:22 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com