Clams Canino wrote:

Time will tell.

What bothers me is those who seem to *want* an escallation of the conflict
and more dead soldiers to nibble at Bush's aproval ratings. There are
plenty of ways to oppose Bush without counting dead troops like trophies.

-W

Who wants an escalation of the conflict in Iraq?

I do wonder how many more body bags it will take before more Americans
finally realize the idiocy of Bush's political war against Iraq.

Saddam has been out of the picture as a player for many months now.

Do you anticipate a drastic change in the *security* situation in Iraq?
If so, why?

Do you think with the capture of Saddam the attacks against American
troops will cease? If so, why?

Do you think the United States is any safer from international Moslem
terrorists than it was before Saddam was captured? If so, why?

Do you think the "show trial" of Saddam will be scheduled so as to
impact the U.S. election campaigns next year? If not, why not?

What do you think the impact might be of another serious and deadly
Moslem terrorist attack on the U.S. before next fall's elections?
Please elaborate.

As I stated this morning, it is good that we've captured Saddam and can
put him on trial, assuming the trial is run properly, but his capture
has little to do with the terrorist threats against us.














--
Email sent to is never read.