Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

In article ,
says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other camp's
view.

You might learn something.

What arrogance.

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!

In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!


I see you're easily amused. Have another hit Joe.

http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Go for a visit Joe, you might learn something...

Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces, or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other
camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!


I see you're easily amused. Have another hit Joe.

http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Go for a visit Joe, you might learn something...

Aljazeera sounds an awful lot like Al Jazirah...a town in Syria that I
suspect you'll be hearing a lot more about in the near future. Can you say
"WMD's"? ;-)





"NOYB" wrote in message
nk.net...
Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces,
or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.


"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...

"jps" wrote in message
...
In article ,

says...

Go to Aljazeera.net and see what the Arab reaction is.

LOL!

Yes, God forbid you actually look at the situation from the other
camp's
view.

LOL!!


You might learn something.

LOL!!!


What arrogance.

LOL!!!!


I see you're easily amused. Have another hit Joe.

http://english.aljazeera.net/HomePage

Go for a visit Joe, you might learn something...

Aljazeera sounds an awful lot like Al Jazirah...a town in Syria that I
suspect you'll be hearing a lot more about in the near future. Can you say
"WMD's"? ;-)


After enough interrogation, Saddam Hussein will eventually be brought around to
say anything and everything the administration hopes to hear.

We'll all switch from a position that the lying ******* couldn't tell the truth
if his life depended on it to believing every syllable he utters that
exonerates our motives for invading Iraq.

They say truth is the first casualty of war.
First causualty of politics too, unfortunately.

In article ,
says...

Aljazeera sounds an awful lot like Al Jazirah...a town in Syria that I
suspect you'll be hearing a lot more about in the near future. Can you say
"WMD's"? ;-)

I don't think you should ask me to "say WMD" since that's the role of
our Commander in Chimp.

Lip service. No proof. Even the head of weapons inspections says
Saddam likely destroyed them as he has said.

Perhaps this is why Saddam has chosen to stay alive. His testimony may
be the last laugh in his feud with the Bush clan.

jps

NOYB wrote:

Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces, or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.



The correct term is occupation forces. That's what they are.
Perhaps you ought to google the term and learn that after WW I and WW II
the allied forces called themselves "Occupied Forces," and "Occupying
Forces." There even were medals issued to individual soldiers to mark
such service.




--
Email sent to is never read.

On Tue, 16 Dec 2003 18:12:51 -0500, Harry Krause wrote:

NOYB wrote:

Every other news agency refers to the troops as "US soldiers, US forces, or
coalition forces". Aljazeera constantly refers to them as "occupation
forces".

As for the protestors in Tikrit and Ramadi...
I'd say it's a pretty safe bet that those are the very same bad guys who
keeping taking pot shots at our troops. Perhaps we can have one of those
"accidental" bombings drop right in the middle of 'em.



The correct term is occupation forces. That's what they are.
Perhaps you ought to google the term and learn that after WW I and WW II
the allied forces called themselves "Occupied Forces," and "Occupying
Forces." There even were medals issued to individual soldiers to mark
such service.

No quibbling, no nothing, just a lie. As I said, you have shown yourself to be
devoid of integrity.

John
On the 'Poco Loco' out of Deale, MD