Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Lloyd Sumpter wrote:
On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 02:33:31 +0000, F330 GT wrote: So...if you want to play with TC-3 oil, snort oil fumes, sacrifice fuel mileage, and endure the noise for a superior hole shot, the 27 to 3 vote is probably right on target. You'll be much happier with the 2 stroke. I don't get it, but different strokes for different folks..... Everyone in the marine industry and most of its environmental critics are aware that there are now at least four manufacturers of two-cycle outboards with DFI, direct fuel injection: systems that put the fuel directly into the combustion chamber after the intake and exhaust ports close. Some interesting data. But I'm confused. If the fuel is injected directly into the combustion chamber (and I assume immediately burned), how does the crankcase get lubricated? By tiny amounts of oil being directly inject into it below (actually through the bore at the piston's side) the piston, raw oil with no fuel (some of the DFIs have an even tinier amount of oil mixed in the fuel but this is just to lubricate the injection system/pump itself) Is there oil in the "fuel" that's injected? Why? Save mentioned; no none to lubricate the engine itself. Now, you say a DFI 2-stroke has better emissions than a 4-stroke. I infer that you're talking about a carburated 4-stroke - what about a DFI 4-stroke (like most 4-stroke motorbike engines are, I believe)? No the 4 strokes are mostly EFI not DFI. There are a couple of DFI 4 strokes, Mitsubishi has been playing with it & also Mercedes but so far it's been shown not to be worth the extra trouble & causes new problems, EPA & power wise. As long as a 2-stoke burns oil, I can't see how it will do better, emission-wise, than a comparable 4-stroke (ie carb-to-carb, DFI-to-DFI, etc). They only inject a tiny amount in the crankcase of the DFI, even less with the latest consumer funded experiment called E-tech (ficht in drag:-)) The "claim" (probably false yet again) that running hour for running hour they'll use less oil that the 4 strokes (change intervals) And, again by experience: I have yet to see a 2-stroke outboard that doesn't smoke like hell at idle. And I see a lot of outboards at launch ramps, marinas, etc. Maybe nobody's buying these DFI outboards? No nobody who has made any sort of independent enquiries. They run very lean mixtures at low revs to get through the EPA & so they heat the pistons with abnormal combustion when lean, when the engine is returned to "normal" mixtures & power is increased the pistons are hot enough to provoke uncontrolled detonation & failure. OMC itself admitted to a 1 in 5 failure rate & none of the so called fixes including the latest, has addressed the core issues. Their latest joke is stronger pistons!!! It'd be funny were it not consumers paying for this BS. Don't buy evinrude not ever, they're rude!!! K See remembered no Harry paste:-) Lloyd Sumpter "Far Cove" Catalina 36 |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Changing Spark Plugs Mercury 4 Stroke Engine | General | |||
old 2 stroke oil mix | General | |||
evinrude 2+4 & 2 stroke oil question | General | |||
Suzuki 140 hp 4 stroke | General | |||
Honda 4 stroke engines | General |