| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , F330 GT
writes Rick, Sounds like trim tabs would do more for you than changing props. Their is probably no better way to achieve slower planing speed than good trim tabs. Of course, that certainly won't be the most economical speed. Most new outboards are most economical in the 3500 to 4000 rpm range. Surely you mean most efficient, not most economical. There is no way an outboard running at 3500rpm gets less gph than one running at 1000rpm. Equally, there is no way it gets better mpg than one running at 1000rpm. Only, m/g/h would it be more economical. I can run all day on a river at 1000rpm (6mph) and only use half a tank. Run on a lake at 25-30mph and 3500rpm and I get through a whole tank in a few hours! -- Nick |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
writes
Rick, Sounds like trim tabs would do more for you than changing props. Their is probably no better way to achieve slower planing speed than good trim tabs. Of course, that certainly won't be the most economical speed. Most new outboards are most economical in the 3500 to 4000 rpm range. Surely you mean most efficient, not most economical. There is no way an outboard running at 3500rpm gets less gph than one running at 1000rpm. Equally, there is no way it gets better mpg than one running at 1000rpm. Only, m/g/h would it be more economical. I can run all day on a river at 1000rpm (6mph) and only use half a tank. Run on a lake at 25-30mph and 3500rpm and I get through a whole tank in a few hours! -- Nick I mean the highest miles per gallon. I'd consider that the most efficient and most economical if I'm trying to to get from point a to point b. The most economical from your perspective would be to leave it in the garage on a trailer. Barry |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , F330 GT
writes writes Rick, Sounds like trim tabs would do more for you than changing props. Their is probably no better way to achieve slower planing speed than good trim tabs. Of course, that certainly won't be the most economical speed. Most new outboards are most economical in the 3500 to 4000 rpm range. Surely you mean most efficient, not most economical. There is no way an outboard running at 3500rpm gets less gph than one running at 1000rpm. Equally, there is no way it gets better mpg than one running at 1000rpm. Only, m/g/h would it be more economical. I can run all day on a river at 1000rpm (6mph) and only use half a tank. Run on a lake at 25-30mph and 3500rpm and I get through a whole tank in a few hours! -- Nick I mean the highest miles per gallon. I'd consider that the most efficient and most economical if I'm trying to to get from point a to point b. The most economical from your perspective would be to leave it in the garage on a trailer. Well fuel is so expensive here in the UK that your suggestion is about the best way to save money... ![]() -- Nick |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Bad News for Lake Erie: From the Toledo Blade | General | |||
| Rigging knife | General | |||
| B.O.A.T. | General | |||
| piranha props | General | |||