Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi
I have just purchased a 2950 Proline with twin 225 OceanRunners. I am trying to get the best economical cruise speed I can. I was wonderig what would be the advantages to a 4 blade prop as apposed to a three blade prop... Thanks Rick |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For this application, good performance SS 4 blade props would be the best
choice. They will give you better acceleration, planing speed, and low speed cruising ability. You will loose a few mph on top end but chances are your not trying for top end speed anyway. You will definetly like the way the boat behaves. Prop for right at max rpms on the engines at wide open. Don't waist your money on aluminum 4 blade or composite 4 blade as you have too much torque for these props to hold their shape over time. -- Tony my boats and autos - http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Diver1055" wrote in message ... Hi I have just purchased a 2950 Proline with twin 225 OceanRunners. I am trying to get the best economical cruise speed I can. I was wonderig what would be the advantages to a 4 blade prop as apposed to a three blade prop... Thanks Rick |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For this application, good performance SS 4 blade props would be the best
choice. They will give you better acceleration, planing speed, and low speed cruising ability. You will loose a few mph on top end but chances are your not trying for top end speed anyway. You will definetly like the way the boat behaves. Prop for right at max rpms on the engines at wide open. Don't waist your money on aluminum 4 blade or composite 4 blade as you have too much torque for these props to hold their shape over time. -- Tony my boats and autos - http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Diver1055" wrote in message ... Hi I have just purchased a 2950 Proline with twin 225 OceanRunners. I am trying to get the best economical cruise speed I can. I was wonderig what would be the advantages to a 4 blade prop as apposed to a three blade prop... Thanks Rick Tony, I don't disagree with the response as far as the qualities of 4 blades but he was asking for the most economical cruise. I can't imagine a 4 blade being more economical than a 3. Common sense tells me there would be less drag with one less blade. Barry |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The most economical cruise is going to be at the lowest rpms and maintaining
plane. A 4 blade will allow for a lower rpm than the 3 blade at minimal plane speed. It will also give you better throttle response and quicker planing. -- Tony My boats and autos - http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "F330 GT" wrote in message ... For this application, good performance SS 4 blade props would be the best choice. They will give you better acceleration, planing speed, and low speed cruising ability. You will loose a few mph on top end but chances are your not trying for top end speed anyway. You will definetly like the way the boat behaves. Prop for right at max rpms on the engines at wide open. Don't waist your money on aluminum 4 blade or composite 4 blade as you have too much torque for these props to hold their shape over time. -- Tony my boats and autos - http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Diver1055" wrote in message ... Hi I have just purchased a 2950 Proline with twin 225 OceanRunners. I am trying to get the best economical cruise speed I can. I was wonderig what would be the advantages to a 4 blade prop as apposed to a three blade prop... Thanks Rick Tony, I don't disagree with the response as far as the qualities of 4 blades but he was asking for the most economical cruise. I can't imagine a 4 blade being more economical than a 3. Common sense tells me there would be less drag with one less blade. Barry |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Tony Thomas" wrote in message news:eJDob.72698$HS4.632907@attbi_s01... The most economical cruise is going to be at the lowest rpms and maintaining plane. A 4 blade will allow for a lower rpm than the 3 blade at minimal plane speed. It will also give you better throttle response and quicker planing. Nope! Not 100% correct. The most economical cruise is going to be near the most effective RPM of the motor. It is going to be a bit higher than the max torque RPM, but still a bit under max HP RPM. To find what RPM gives the most economical cruise, you just have to do som testing. As speed increases, the drag increases. This will offset the economy RPM. A 4 blade prop has more drag due to one more blade to push through the water, so the 3 blade may be better for economy. This again depends on propeller design. A good 3 blade SS prop is probably best for economy. A good 4 blade prop gives better accelration and less vibration, but lower top speed. Trond |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In the lower rpm range, while traveling in displacement mode, (I do a
lot of that) will a 4 blade "push" more water at a lower rpm? That is to say will a 4 blade 21"x18" stainless perform as well as a 3 blade 21"x21" or would I simply be overloading the motor? Capt. Frank Trond Solem wrote: "Tony Thomas" wrote in message news:eJDob.72698$HS4.632907@attbi_s01... The most economical cruise is going to be at the lowest rpms and maintaining plane. A 4 blade will allow for a lower rpm than the 3 blade at minimal plane speed. It will also give you better throttle response and quicker planing. Nope! Not 100% correct. The most economical cruise is going to be near the most effective RPM of the motor. It is going to be a bit higher than the max torque RPM, but still a bit under max HP RPM. To find what RPM gives the most economical cruise, you just have to do som testing. As speed increases, the drag increases. This will offset the economy RPM. A 4 blade prop has more drag due to one more blade to push through the water, so the 3 blade may be better for economy. This again depends on propeller design. A good 3 blade SS prop is probably best for economy. A good 4 blade prop gives better accelration and less vibration, but lower top speed. Trond |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
First of all, normally a 4 blade prop will have a smaller diameter than the
3 blade to compensate for the extra blade surface. You want to go with the same pitch prop. The 18 will be way too small a prop and will travel less and be less efficient than the 21. Stay with same pitch which is inches of travel forward per revolution (in theory not compensating for slip). A 4 blade will have less slip at lower rpms than a 3 blade which is why it will be more efficient at cruise. -- Tony my boats and autos - http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message .net... In the lower rpm range, while traveling in displacement mode, (I do a lot of that) will a 4 blade "push" more water at a lower rpm? That is to say will a 4 blade 21"x18" stainless perform as well as a 3 blade 21"x21" or would I simply be overloading the motor? Capt. Frank Trond Solem wrote: "Tony Thomas" wrote in message news:eJDob.72698$HS4.632907@attbi_s01... The most economical cruise is going to be at the lowest rpms and maintaining plane. A 4 blade will allow for a lower rpm than the 3 blade at minimal plane speed. It will also give you better throttle response and quicker planing. Nope! Not 100% correct. The most economical cruise is going to be near the most effective RPM of the motor. It is going to be a bit higher than the max torque RPM, but still a bit under max HP RPM. To find what RPM gives the most economical cruise, you just have to do som testing. As speed increases, the drag increases. This will offset the economy RPM. A 4 blade prop has more drag due to one more blade to push through the water, so the 3 blade may be better for economy. This again depends on propeller design. A good 3 blade SS prop is probably best for economy. A good 4 blade prop gives better accelration and less vibration, but lower top speed. Trond |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Ok, Tony,
That makes sense. Is there a formula for calculating a prop's thrust? rpm vs hp? Given 21" pitch and the current 3 blade a 21" diameter (stainless steel) 21?R²(0.66)=19.0250?R²(0.80) it doesn't work out exactly. If the formula doesn't display in the newsgroup, I will try a different venue. Thanks, Capt Frank Tony Thomas wrote: First of all, normally a 4 blade prop will have a smaller diameter than the 3 blade to compensate for the extra blade surface. You want to go with the same pitch prop. The 18 will be way too small a prop and will travel less and be less efficient than the 21. Stay with same pitch which is inches of travel forward per revolution (in theory not compensating for slip). A 4 blade will have less slip at lower rpms than a 3 blade which is why it will be more efficient at cruise. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Only formula I am aware of is the speed formula.
rpm x pitch ------------------ = theoritical speed x efficiency = actual speed 1056 x gear ratio 1056 is a conversion factor to get from inches of pitch and rev per minute into miles per hour. gear ratio will be 1.5 or 1.86 or 2.0 depending on your motor usually. -- Tony my boats and autos - http://t.thomas.home.mchsi.com "Capt. Frank Hopkins" wrote in message nk.net... Ok, Tony, That makes sense. Is there a formula for calculating a prop's thrust? rpm vs hp? Given 21" pitch and the current 3 blade a 21" diameter (stainless steel) 21?R²(0.66)=19.0250?R²(0.80) it doesn't work out exactly. If the formula doesn't display in the newsgroup, I will try a different venue. Thanks, Capt Frank Tony Thomas wrote: First of all, normally a 4 blade prop will have a smaller diameter than the 3 blade to compensate for the extra blade surface. You want to go with the same pitch prop. The 18 will be way too small a prop and will travel less and be less efficient than the 21. Stay with same pitch which is inches of travel forward per revolution (in theory not compensating for slip). A 4 blade will have less slip at lower rpms than a 3 blade which is why it will be more efficient at cruise. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Thanks a lot Tony.
I will see what else I can find on the subject and post it. CF Tony Thomas wrote: Only formula I am aware of is the speed formula. rpm x pitch ------------------ = theoritical speed x efficiency = actual speed 1056 x gear ratio 1056 is a conversion factor to get from inches of pitch and rev per minute into miles per hour. gear ratio will be 1.5 or 1.86 or 2.0 depending on your motor usually. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Bad News for Lake Erie: From the Toledo Blade | General | |||
Rigging knife | General | |||
B.O.A.T. | General | |||
piranha props | General |