They're just thugs...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now? Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?


Sounds like present day Muslim's. Convert or die.

They're just thugs...
 

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 10:28 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:07:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/16/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping,
killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.




Whew. For a minute there I thought you were going to blame it on GWB.


In his mind there's nothing to blame. The actions of today's extremist Muslims are,
using Krauselogic, totally justified by the actions of Christians a thousand years
ago.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



In your mind, well, there's nothing there.


I think 610 when Mohammed got his message is before most of the extremes of
Christianity occurred.

They're just thugs...
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:13:36 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 11/16/15 11:09 AM, wrote:

We could easily extend that complaint to a lot of left wing practices
like global warming hysteria.


Right, because it interferes with your Corporations Uber Alles beliefs.

No. Because it is an irrational response to a problem that we still
have not really come up with a reasonable plan for. If this is CO2,
that is more of a population problem than an oil problem but the
people who hate oil jumped on the bandwagon when they saw an
opportunity. 40 years ago the problem was the smog producing gasses
that came out of tail pipes. We fixed that and most exhaust gas is CO2
and water vapor now ... so CO2 was next.

Without cutting way back on all forms of agriculture and eliminating
farm animals, you are never going to make a dent in greenhouse gas but
that is not a politically viable solution so they go after the low
fruit, the evil oil company.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/2015 11:45 AM, True North wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2015 11:25:10 UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:50:10 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 11/16/2015 6:24 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.


Are you sure you are a writer, Krause?

I wonder why Donnie doesn't jump in to help you out? You sure could use
some assistance with your writing.

Donnie! Help!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Huh?? So, you're not happy harassing and piling on Harry eh?
Now you want to drag me into your little jihad?


Are you going to abandon your buddie in his time of need?

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 8:01 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 07:48:08 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping, killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?


So the killing, raping, beheading, etc. being practiced by Muslims now is OK, because
centuries ago Christians were doing it.

That's Krause logic, eh? WADumFoch!

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.


But it's OK for Muslims to push their belief in public, eh? You're a joke, Krause!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


If you were capable of thinking, you'd know I've never said or implied
any such thing. There should be a "kiddie table" here for you and your
buddies, who seem determined to prove your stupidity over and again.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 11:24 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:01:19 -0500, John H.
wrote:

Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?


So the killing, raping, beheading, etc. being practiced by Muslims now is OK, because
centuries ago Christians were doing it.

Harry only looks back when it is convenient to his point. He doesn't
want to talk about all of those New England sailors who were loading
black people on ships and bringing then to the new world for money,
abusing them below deck and throwing the dead or uncooperative ones
over the side. He doesn't even want to talk about the brand of
apartheid that is going on in the West bank


I don't recall your leading a discussion on the importation of slaves to
this country. Were those New Englanders Muslims? :)

The so-called Palestinians have had many opportunities for peace. They
don't want it.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 11:45 AM, True North wrote:
On Monday, 16 November 2015 11:25:10 UTC-4, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 08:50:10 -0500, Justan Olphart wrote:

On 11/16/2015 6:24 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.


Are you sure you are a writer, Krause?

I wonder why Donnie doesn't jump in to help you out? You sure could use
some assistance with your writing.

Donnie! Help!
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


Huh?? So, you're not happy harassing and piling on Harry eh?
Now you want to drag me into your little jihad?



Herring, FlaJim, and the two Scotties are easily the dumbest posters in
rec.bloats.

They're just thugs...
 

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 11:22:18 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Haven't seen many public chanukah displays.

Strange, you must really live in an anti semitic place. They are
around here, generally just a Menorah but it appears that nobody
understand when you light the candles. They put them up with all
lights lit. Occasionally they even use multicolored bulbs.
Oy vey!


As for that jewish fella, jesus, hell, that isn't even his name, if
there was such a person.

Dunno, I would not be shocked if it was just a generic reference to a
number of evangelical Jews who were killed by the Romans.
I do understand very little of the new testiment actually dates to the
first decade AD.

There is still a lot wisdom in the writings, I just don't have any
brand loyalty.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 12:52 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 6:25 AM, Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 5:11:28 AM UTC-6, Keyser Söze wrote:
Tim wrote:
On Monday, November 16, 2015 at 12:49:03 AM UTC-6, RGrew176 wrote:
I don't think that Aljazeera could be considered to be a right wing news
source.

http://tinyurl.com/p7yjadj

And CNN is certainly NOT a right wing news source.

http://www.cnn.com/2015/01/13/world/...ina-burqa-ban/

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!




--
RGrew176

Nor the Huffington post...

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/0...n_5551063.html


Get back to us when you find a legit article that states the PRC has banned
the Muslim religion.

--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

Get back to us when you can disprove the article RGrew posted


Are you channeling Herring now? Oh, and it wasn't a news article...it
was a screed from a "convert" to Christianity. Remember reading about
the good old days, when Christianity forced non-believers to convert or
die?


Sounds like present day Muslim's. Convert or die.


Sounds like the Muslims learned it from the Christians...convert or die.

They're just thugs...
 

On 11/16/15 1:02 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 10:28 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 09:07:54 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:

On 11/16/2015 7:48 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 11/16/15 7:02 AM, John H. wrote:
On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 06:24:25 -0500, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 11/15/15 8:31 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 15 Nov 2015 19:26:27 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

I don't think it was a knee jerk at all. I believe most people
understand the chinese tolerate religion as long as it doesn't
threaten their idea of the general order or challenge the central
government.


Pretty much how it's supposed to work here.


I tend to agree with Harry that we may have tipped the other way too
far. When Democrats have to go to prayer breakfasts to get elected, we
may be letting the church run our life a tad too much and they have
destroyed the GOP.
On the other hand the Harry's of the world are pressing too hard not
to ever see any sign of the religions too.

When there is enough politically correct pressure that Starbucks can't
put a santa clause on a coffee cup, we have lost our way


I have no objections to reasonable religious practices "practiced" in
churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera, or even the occasional
"let us pray" nonsense that creeps into the non-church environment. My
objection to religion is when its proponents push it into the public
sector, when it attempts to pass laws that restrict those who believe
differently, when it insinuates itself into public schools, et cetera.

Unless it's Islam, correct? Then the pushing, beheading, raping,
killing, and other
public 'practices' are OK, eh Krause?
--


Those would be the practices the Muslims learned from Christians, right,
Johnnycakes? Because, as we all know, Christians engaged in these
practices before there was a Muslim religion and after the Muslim
religion came about. You know the old Christian battle cry, right? The
one that goes "Convert or die"?

My primary concern about the evils of religious-osity is how it is
practiced in *this* country. In this country, it is mostly Christian
extremists who push their superstitious and ignorant beliefs onto the
public outside of churches, homes, religious schools, et cetera.




Whew. For a minute there I thought you were going to blame it on GWB.


In his mind there's nothing to blame. The actions of today's extremist Muslims are,
using Krauselogic, totally justified by the actions of Christians a thousand years
ago.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!



In your mind, well, there's nothing there.


I think 610 when Mohammed got his message is before most of the extremes of
Christianity occurred.


I think your knowledge of "Christianity" is lacking.