Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#51
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#52
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote: Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on third party candidates. There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the candidate you agree with the most. It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo. For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration. I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are the candidates I vote for... As long as they are democrats Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting? The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind. Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected. Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street, repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their board) He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity" was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were vanishing before our eyes.. You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat. Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now. They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are happy about it. Woof Woof |
#54
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote: Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on third party candidates. There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the candidate you agree with the most. It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo. For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration. I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are the candidates I vote for... As long as they are democrats Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting? The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind. Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected. Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street, repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their board) He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity" was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were vanishing before our eyes.. You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat. Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now. They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are happy about it. Woof Woof I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny. |
#55
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:08:09 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote: Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on third party candidates. There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the candidate you agree with the most. It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo. For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration. I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are the candidates I vote for... As long as they are democrats Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting? The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind. Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected. Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street, repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their board) He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity" was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were vanishing before our eyes.. You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat. Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now. They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are happy about it. Woof Woof I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny. To you, integrity is a meaningless concept. Tell us again about searching for dead soldiers in Vietnam, Krause. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#56
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/2015 6:08 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote: Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on third party candidates. There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the candidate you agree with the most. It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo. For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration. I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are the candidates I vote for... As long as they are democrats Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting? The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind. Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected. Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street, repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their board) He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity" was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were vanishing before our eyes.. You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat. Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now. They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are happy about it. Woof Woof I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny. Never mind the comparisons. Do you trust Mrs Clinton? Yes or no? |
#57
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:08:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote: Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on third party candidates. There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the candidate you agree with the most. It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo. For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration. I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are the candidates I vote for... As long as they are democrats Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting? The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind. Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected. Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street, repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their board) He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity" was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were vanishing before our eyes.. You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat. Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now. They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are happy about it. Woof Woof I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny. So you will just hold your nose and vote for the crook the establishment sends you. It is no wonder nothing ever changes. As long as they know that nobody will ever vote for a 3d party, there will only be ONE. The Remocrat/Depublicans, bribed by the same cabal |
#58
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 10/20/15 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:08:09 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote: Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on third party candidates. There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the candidate you agree with the most. It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo. For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration. I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are the candidates I vote for... As long as they are democrats Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting? The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind. Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected. Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street, repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their board) He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity" was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were vanishing before our eyes.. You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat. Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now. They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are happy about it. Woof Woof I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny. So you will just hold your nose and vote for the crook the establishment sends you. It is no wonder nothing ever changes. As long as they know that nobody will ever vote for a 3d party, there will only be ONE. The Remocrat/Depublicans, bribed by the same cabal You really need to stop projecting. I don't have any serious issues with Mrs. Clinton as POTUS. And it is fine with me if you want to toss your vote away on an unknown, untried, no experience whatsoever libertarian. Oh, wait...maybe Jim Webb will announce a run as an Indy. That should move his rating in the polls from what, zero, to what, zero plus you and Luddite? |
#59
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#60
![]()
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 21 Oct 2015 06:21:02 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/20/15 11:15 PM, wrote: On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 20:44:46 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: I liked Bill Clinton, and I liked him as POTUS. He lied about a blowjob. His successor lied us into shooting wars with ground troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. The difference between fiction and history is fact. Sure...right...whatever you say. Fiction - you retrieving bodies of dead soldiers. Fact - the owls 'down by the creek' weren't. -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES | General | |||
Best Car Air conditioners from Leading Manufacturers & Suppliers ! | Cruising | |||
KIWIS leading! | ASA |