Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #51   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 1,401
Default The leading...

In article ra6a2b1mo1kidlok4242rh1msjhgrjqjim@
4ax.com, says...

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.


One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.


That is fantasy. Email has at least two ends to it,
plus places in the middle where it can be captured.
HRC obviously did all her dirty deals employing a
"cone of silence," ala Maxwell Smart.

I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.


That'll work. Just need a Congressional Committee to
look into it.
Oh, wait...

  #52   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default The leading...

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...


As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?


The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind.

Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a
campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected.
Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in
your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street,
repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't
ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart
the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their
board)
He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in
Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity"
was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his
fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing
before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were
vanishing before our eyes..

You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat.

Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all
of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now.
They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are
happy about it.
Woof Woof
  #53   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default The leading...

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:48:45 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ra6a2b1mo1kidlok4242rh1msjhgrjqjim@
4ax.com, says...

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.


One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.


That is fantasy. Email has at least two ends to it,
plus places in the middle where it can be captured.
HRC obviously did all her dirty deals employing a
"cone of silence," ala Maxwell Smart.


If the other end of that Email was another Clinton, on the same server
.... poof.
The deals themselves were going to be made face to face.



I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.


That'll work. Just need a Congressional Committee to
look into it.
Oh, wait...


.... or just a few young newspaper guys actually willing to do the work
on the ground. Without the Washington Post and WoodStein, the
Watergate committee wouldn't have found anything.
  #54   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default The leading...

On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM,
wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?


The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind.

Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a
campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected.
Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in
your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street,
repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't
ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart
the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their
board)
He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in
Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity"
was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his
fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing
before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were
vanishing before our eyes..

You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat.

Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all
of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now.
They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are
happy about it.
Woof Woof



I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the
nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny.
  #55   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2008
Posts: 8,663
Default The leading...

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:08:09 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM,
wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?


The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind.

Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a
campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected.
Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in
your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street,
repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't
ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart
the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their
board)
He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in
Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity"
was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his
fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing
before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were
vanishing before our eyes..

You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat.

Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all
of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now.
They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are
happy about it.
Woof Woof



I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the
nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny.


To you, integrity is a meaningless concept.

Tell us again about searching for dead soldiers in Vietnam, Krause.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!


  #56   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2015
Posts: 1,244
Default The leading...

On 10/20/2015 6:08 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM,
wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on
issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days,
that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste
votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status
quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business
candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most.
Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?


The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind.

Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a
campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected.
Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in
your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street,
repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't
ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart
the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their
board)
He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in
Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity"
was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his
fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing
before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were
vanishing before our eyes..

You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat.

Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all
of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now.
They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are
happy about it.
Woof Woof



I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the
nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny.


Never mind the comparisons. Do you trust Mrs Clinton? Yes or no?
  #57   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 36,387
Default The leading...

On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:08:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 10:28 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM,
wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?


The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind.

Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a
campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected.
Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in
your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street,
repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't
ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart
the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their
board)
He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in
Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity"
was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his
fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing
before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were
vanishing before our eyes..

You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat.

Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all
of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now.
They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are
happy about it.
Woof Woof



I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the
nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny.


So you will just hold your nose and vote for the crook the
establishment sends you.

It is no wonder nothing ever changes. As long as they know that nobody
will ever vote for a 3d party, there will only be ONE. The
Remocrat/Depublicans, bribed by the same cabal
  #58   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default The leading...

On 10/20/15 11:43 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 06:08:09 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 10:28 PM,
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:10:08 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM,
wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?

The words "yellow dog democrat" spring to mind.

Maybe it is just that they know how to talk to their base in a
campaign, no matter what they are going to do after being elected.
Bill is the perfect example. He had you all gushing and creaming in
your jeans for 8 years while he was deregulating wall street,
repealing most of the "new deal" banking laws, signing DOMA and "don't
ask", "reforming" welfare and passing trade deals that made Walmart
the biggest retailer in the world. (Remember Hillary was on their
board)
He maintained the Iraq war for 8 years and settled for a deal in
Bosnia which assured ethnic cleansing could continue. His "prosperity"
was largely built on a bubble called "irrational exuberance" by his
fed chair alo0ng with a whole lot of plain old fraud. It was crashing
before he got out of town and all of those "surplus" projections were
vanishing before our eyes..

You still want his face on Rushmore. That is a yellow dog democrat.

Do you really trust Hillary to be what she says she will be after all
of that? More that half of the democrats polled don't trust her now.
They will still vote for her, get what they get and pretend they are
happy about it.
Woof Woof



I trust Mrs. Clinton a lot more than any of the GOPers who want the
nomination. Are you suggesting I vote for a Libertarian? That's funny.


So you will just hold your nose and vote for the crook the
establishment sends you.

It is no wonder nothing ever changes. As long as they know that nobody
will ever vote for a 3d party, there will only be ONE. The
Remocrat/Depublicans, bribed by the same cabal


You really need to stop projecting. I don't have any serious issues with
Mrs. Clinton as POTUS. And it is fine with me if you want to toss your
vote away on an unknown, untried, no experience whatsoever libertarian.
Oh, wait...maybe Jim Webb will announce a run as an Indy. That should
move his rating in the polls from what, zero, to what, zero plus you and
Luddite?
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES bpuharic General 36 April 14th 10 11:27 PM
Best Car Air conditioners from Leading Manufacturers & Suppliers ! [email protected] Cruising 0 May 19th 07 12:02 AM
KIWIS leading! Nav ASA 2 October 11th 04 11:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:24 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017