On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 19:48:45 -0500, Boating All Out
wrote:

In article ra6a2b1mo1kidlok4242rh1msjhgrjqjim@
4ax.com, says...

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:



Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always
Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee.

One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their
tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury
and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee
and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a
respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast
left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton
tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them.
I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference
between having your own mail server and having a personal account
with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who
had "private" email accounts)
If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the
smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew
that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after
reading.

That is fantasy. Email has at least two ends to it,
plus places in the middle where it can be captured.
HRC obviously did all her dirty deals employing a
"cone of silence," ala Maxwell Smart.

If the other end of that Email was another Clinton, on the same server
.... poof.
The deals themselves were going to be made face to face.



I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find
the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions
state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a
conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy
shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign
government official.

That'll work. Just need a Congressional Committee to
look into it.
Oh, wait...

.... or just a few young newspaper guys actually willing to do the work
on the ground. Without the Washington Post and WoodStein, the
Watergate committee wouldn't have found anything.