Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
On 10/19/2015 11:00 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:53 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/19/2015 10:38 AM, John H. wrote: On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 10:30:53 -0400, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...GOP candidate... "Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World Trade Center on September 11. "I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country." - - - Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes. Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson. Crikey. You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he didn't do anything about it either. That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect asshole" according to you. I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running things" beyond his businesses in the future. I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to 2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent. Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA. And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in 2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to figure out on a given day which one is the worst. "If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from global thermonuclear war... Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him every chance you can. Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have. On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out. I'd much rather try to choose the lesser of two evils come election day. You've forgotten where I live. Unless you vote for a Democrat to add to the overwhelming tally, voting for president is just an exercise. Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so. You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year, considering his opponent was Reagan. Actually, I meant 1972 ... McGovern vs Nixon.. Massachusetts was the only state that went for McGovern. |
#22
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:00:48 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so. You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year, considering his opponent was Reagan. 84 was Mondale but it is a distinction without a difference. |
#23
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 11:00:48 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote: Massachusetts has gone Republican only 4 times since 1928, twice for Eisenhower and twice for Reagan. Even George McGovern won the state's electoral votes in 1974 ... the only state to do so. You mean 1984, of course...and he was the lesser of two evils that year, considering his opponent was Reagan. 84 was Mondale but it is a distinction without a difference. Right. -- Sent from my iPhone 6+ |
#24
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
On 10/19/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...GOP candidate... "Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World Trade Center on September 11. "I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country." - - - Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes. Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson. Crikey. You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he didn't do anything about it either. That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect asshole" according to you. I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running things" beyond his businesses in the future. I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to 2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent. Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA. And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in 2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to figure out on a given day which one is the worst. "If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from global thermonuclear war... Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him every chance you can. Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have. On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out. Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee. |
#25
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 10:30 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/19/2015 10:06 AM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 8:15 AM, Tim wrote: On Monday, October 19, 2015 at 5:30:43 AM UTC-5, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/19/15 1:57 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/18/2015 8:04 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: On 10/18/15 7:44 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 10/18/2015 5:01 PM, Keyser Söze wrote: ...GOP candidate... "Donald Trump says that if he had been president in 2001, his immigration policies would have kept terrorists from attacking the World Trade Center on September 11. "I am extremely, extremely tough on illegal immigration. I'm extremely tough on people coming into this country," Trump said on Fox News Sunday. "I believe that if I were running things, I doubt those families would have -- I doubt that those people would have been in the country." - - - Donald Trump, the *perfect* asshole candidate for the party of assholes. Really. And just behind Trump, another asshole candidate, Ben Carson. Crikey. You (nor I) have no way of knowing if Trump's position on illegal immigration would have prevented al-Qaeda from sending terrorists to the USA to attend flight schools in preparation for the 9/11 attacks had he been POTUS at the time. Warnings of "something is up" were raised back when Clinton was still in office for cripes sake and he didn't do anything about it either. That said, you crack me up (again). In the past you have placed responsibility for 9/11 squarely on GWB because it happened on his watch. Trump basically just said the same thing but now he's a "perfect asshole" according to you. I don't recall Trump's policies on immigration in 2001. Do you? And he wasn't "running things" back then and it isn't likely he'll be "running things" beyond his businesses in the future. I doubt if Trump knew what Bush did or did not do in the lead up to 2001. His knowledge of such things seems non-existent. Not what Trump said. He said "if" he had been POTUS at the time with the illegal immigration position that he has described *now*, the terrorists may not have been able to get into the USA. And you believe that, right? Hey, Trump, Carson, and the rest of the GOP wannabe bozos are exactly what the Republicans deserve in 2016...politically naive, ignorant, hate-filled, science-denying idiots who appeal to the "base" of the party. The only difficult part is to figure out on a given day which one is the worst. "If" Trump had been president in 2001, we'd be trying to recover from global thermonuclear war... Harry are you scared of Trump? you must be because you blast him every chance you can. Why would I be scared of Trump, Tim? I just am enjoying the fact that your party seems intent on nominating one of several unsuitable flaming asses for POTUS. Trump, Carson, Cruz, Rubio, Fiorina, Bush, et cetera...crikey, what a crowd you boys have. On the other hand, we have a choice of Hillary the Hun who could fool a polygraph machine or Bernie the Socialist who wants to re-write the Constitution. Think I'll just sit this one out. Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee. Or just look at the author of your post, eh? Which unit were you with in Vietnam? How're those owls doing, eh? Your red barn been repainted yet? -- Ban idiots, not guns! |
#26
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 12:15:10 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote: Well, if you are looking for a total lack of credibility, there's always Trey Gowdy and his fellow GOP bull****ters on the Benghazi Committee. One thing seems to be true. The Clintons are so good at covering their tracks that the only thing they might ever be convicted of is perjury and obstruction of justice. Hillary worked on the Watergate committee and she knows that without the tapes, Nixon would have retired as a respected former president who survived an onslaught from the vast left wing conspiracy. You can bet your ass there are no "Clinton tapes" or anything else that might come back to haunt them. I am always amazed at the people who do not understand the difference between having your own mail server and having a personal account with Gmail, Hotmail or a web host. (like everyone else mentioned who had "private" email accounts) If you delete an Email on your own server, you virtually smell the smoke of it burning. Not so on any of the other services. Hillary knew that and I assume any sensitive communications were burned right after reading. I still think they should follow the money if they really want to find the dirt. Was there any quid pro quo on the massive contributions state actors made to the CGI? There is certainly the potential of a conflict of interest there. It doesn't take much of a minor policy shift at State to put a lot of extra cash in the pocket of a foreign government official. |
#27
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
- show quoted text -
It doesn't matter if you've endorsed Trump or any of the other Republicans...when you vote, if you vote, I'm pretty sure you'll vote for the *R* candidate no matter who it is. You've got a hell of a choice there, eh? Poor Gus Hall. No, Tim, Hall was never a candidate of "my" party. Where do you source this nonsense? Even the Russian Commies didn't have much use for Hall. ......... Using your "reasoning " I'll vot for Trump because he's of "my" party. Again if that's the case I'll use your "reasoning " and say you'd vote for Hall because he's a nominee of "your" party. Harry you shouldn't knee jerk to premature conclusions and label others like that. |
#28
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
On 10/19/15 1:11 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text - It doesn't matter if you've endorsed Trump or any of the other Republicans...when you vote, if you vote, I'm pretty sure you'll vote for the *R* candidate no matter who it is. You've got a hell of a choice there, eh? Poor Gus Hall. No, Tim, Hall was never a candidate of "my" party. Where do you source this nonsense? Even the Russian Commies didn't have much use for Hall. ........ Using your "reasoning " I'll vot for Trump because he's of "my" party. Again if that's the case I'll use your "reasoning " and say you'd vote for Hall because he's a nominee of "your" party. Harry you shouldn't knee jerk to premature conclusions and label others like that. Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll vote for him. |
#29
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
|
#30
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
The leading...
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll vote for him. .......... I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
leading spenders in US history? CONSERVATIVES | General | |||
Best Car Air conditioners from Leading Manufacturers & Suppliers ! | Cruising | |||
KIWIS leading! | ASA |