On 10/19/15 5:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 5:30 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain
you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate
claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the
Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that
rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.


That's at odds with statements you've made in the past.
You have stated several times that you would support and vote
for the Democrat nominee period. You are a party guy.



Well, how could I support the Republican nominees, when those nominees
take positions that are racist, anti-student, anti-woman, anti-abortion,
anti-immigrant, anti-environment, anti-worker, et cetera, and are so
proud of it. I disagree with the Republicans on almost every issue. You
want me to vote for people like that?

On 10/19/15 5:59 PM, wrote:
On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 17:30:06 -0400, Keyser Söze
wrote:

Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

On 10/19/2015 6:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 5:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 5:30 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain
you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if
Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of
course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate
claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the
Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues
that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that
rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.


That's at odds with statements you've made in the past.
You have stated several times that you would support and vote
for the Democrat nominee period. You are a party guy.



Well, how could I support the Republican nominees, when those nominees
take positions that are racist, anti-student, anti-woman, anti-abortion,
anti-immigrant, anti-environment, anti-worker, et cetera, and are so
proud of it. I disagree with the Republicans on almost every issue. You
want me to vote for people like that?


Of course not and I'd be disappointed if you did. That's not the point
though. You have stated many times that you would support and vote for
the Democrat nominee, regardless of who it may be. Are you now
suggesting that you might *not* support or vote for the Democrat nominee
if he/she were found to be ... let's see ... maybe a proven
liar with a long history of questionable and deceitful activities?

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 18:22:51 -0400, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:

Are you now
suggesting that you might *not* support or vote for the Democrat nominee
if he/she were found to be ... let's see ... maybe a proven
liar with a long history of questionable and deceitful activities?

===

Harry wouldn't know lying, deceitful or questionable if he tripped
over them and fell.

- show quoted text -
Sorry, Tim, but I'm not a fan of the Communist Party, nor do I vote for
non-mainstream political party candidates. I do feel confident, though,
that if Trump is the GOP nominee, you will vote for him.
..........

Harry Potter f you really want.......
........

Good old autocorrect. How could "Harry perhaps if". Turn into "Harry Potter " I don't know. Fumble finger typing and didn't catch a proof read.
Lol!

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats

On 10/19/15 6:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 6:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 5:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 5:30 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain
you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if
Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of
course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate
claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the
Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take
over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses
some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be
happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you
do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues
that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that
rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.


That's at odds with statements you've made in the past.
You have stated several times that you would support and vote
for the Democrat nominee period. You are a party guy.



Well, how could I support the Republican nominees, when those nominees
take positions that are racist, anti-student, anti-woman, anti-abortion,
anti-immigrant, anti-environment, anti-worker, et cetera, and are so
proud of it. I disagree with the Republicans on almost every issue. You
want me to vote for people like that?


Of course not and I'd be disappointed if you did. That's not the point
though. You have stated many times that you would support and vote for
the Democrat nominee, regardless of who it may be. Are you now
suggesting that you might *not* support or vote for the Democrat nominee
if he/she were found to be ... let's see ... maybe a proven
liar with a long history of questionable and deceitful activities?

You mean, as opposed to a Republican candidate who is a proved liar with
a long history of blah, blah, blah? Like, oh, Trump, Carson, Cruz,
Fiorina, et al?

On 10/19/15 6:43 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Sorry, Tim, but I'm not a fan of the Communist Party, nor do I vote for
non-mainstream political party candidates. I do feel confident, though,
that if Trump is the GOP nominee, you will vote for him.
.........

Harry Potter f you really want.......
.......

Good old autocorrect. How could "Harry perhaps if". Turn into "Harry Potter " I don't know. Fumble finger typing and didn't catch a proof read.
Lol!


Turn off autocorrect.

On 10/19/15 7:06 PM, wrote:

Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.

There is no bigger waste of your vote than to fail to vote for the
candidate you agree with the most.
It is that thinking that assures you will never change the status quo.

For the last 25 years, we have just got the big business candidate, no
matter which party won. Hillary will be the 5th Bush administration.


I don't fail to vote for the candidates I agree with the most. Those are
the candidates I vote for...

As long as they are democrats


Well, there haven't been any Republicans running for statewide or
national office I agree with...so what are you suggesting?

On Mon, 19 Oct 2015 20:07:34 -0400, Keyser Söze wrote:

On 10/19/15 6:22 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 6:14 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 5:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 5:30 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 4:52 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 10/19/15 4:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 10/19/2015 3:06 PM, Tim wrote:
- show quoted text -
Gus Hall is dead, Tim. But if Trump is the nominee, I'm certain
you'll
vote for him.

.........

I know, and Trump wasn't president nor a nominee in 2001. But if
Hall
was alive you'd probably vote for him. (Using your logic, of
course!)



Hall's successors end up endorsing the Democrat party candidate
claiming
the Democrat party is closer to the Communist Party USA ideological
principles compared to the GOP.


As far as I can tell from today's leading GOP candidates, the
Republican
Party has no principles whatsoever.


They have principles but few that I can comfortably subscribe to.
Trump has some fundamental beliefs outside of the Tea Party's take
over
and influence but it's hard to imagine him as POTUS. He expresses
some
of the popular frustrations but doesn't have any realistic fixes.

I suppose I *could* make life simple and just pick a party and be
happy
to vote for it's nominee, regardless of who he or she is. Like you
do.




Wow. No,I don't do that. I pick candidates whose positions on issues
that
concern me align reasonably well with my positions. These days, that
rarely
is a Republican and almost always is a Democrat. I don't waste votes on
third party candidates.


That's at odds with statements you've made in the past.
You have stated several times that you would support and vote
for the Democrat nominee period. You are a party guy.



Well, how could I support the Republican nominees, when those nominees
take positions that are racist, anti-student, anti-woman, anti-abortion,
anti-immigrant, anti-environment, anti-worker, et cetera, and are so
proud of it. I disagree with the Republicans on almost every issue. You
want me to vote for people like that?


Of course not and I'd be disappointed if you did. That's not the point
though. You have stated many times that you would support and vote for
the Democrat nominee, regardless of who it may be. Are you now
suggesting that you might *not* support or vote for the Democrat nominee
if he/she were found to be ... let's see ... maybe a proven
liar with a long history of questionable and deceitful activities?

You mean, as opposed to a Republican candidate who is a proved liar with
a long history of blah, blah, blah? Like, oh, Trump, Carson, Cruz,
Fiorina, et al?

More like you, a proven liar.
--

Ban idiots, not guns!