[Mr. Luddite]

Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

[Keyser Söze]

On 2/27/15 2:49 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:

Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

Thanks...been reading some rumblings about this, but your cite was the
clearest I've seen

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

[John H.[_5_]]

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:58:36 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.

Maybe we'll learn in afterlife.
--

Guns don't cause problems. The behavior
of certain gun owners causes problems.

[Keyser Söze]

On 2/27/15 4:04 PM, John H. wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 15:58:36 -0500, wrote:

On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.

Maybe we'll learn in afterlife.



The only "afterlife" you're going to have is as worm food.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

[Keyser Söze]

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



--
Proud to be a Liberal.

[Keyser Söze]

On 2/27/15 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



It is interesting that is all you saw in the whole post.
You really are obsessed



There isn't an iota of "proof" for the existence of god. Nothing, zip,
zilch, nada.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

[Mr. Luddite]

On 2/27/2015 6:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



It is interesting that is all you saw in the whole post.
You really are obsessed



There isn't an iota of "proof" for the existence of god. Nothing, zip,
zilch, nada.



The god you seek proof of may not exist in the form that you are
expecting to witness. When I view the Hubble Telescope's famous
image, "Pillars of Creation" I am both awed and humbled. I think
sometimes pure arrogance and self importance can be blinding.

http://i.space.com/images/i/000/044/723/original/pillars-of-creation-eagle-nebula-new-image.jpg?1420556219

[Keyser Söze]

On 2/27/15 7:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/27/2015 6:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



It is interesting that is all you saw in the whole post.
You really are obsessed



There isn't an iota of "proof" for the existence of god. Nothing, zip,
zilch, nada.



The god you seek proof of may not exist in the form that you are
expecting to witness. When I view the Hubble Telescope's famous
image, "Pillars of Creation" I am both awed and humbled. I think
sometimes pure arrogance and self importance can be blinding.

http://i.space.com/images/i/000/044/723/original/pillars-of-creation-eagle-nebula-new-image.jpg?1420556219


It's just too easy and anti-intellectual to pin "creation" on a creator.
There's no evidence of same. There's nothing in the "pillars" photo that
evidences a god.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

[Justan Olphart]

On 2/27/2015 7:05 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 7:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/27/2015 6:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce"
theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



It is interesting that is all you saw in the whole post.
You really are obsessed



There isn't an iota of "proof" for the existence of god. Nothing, zip,
zilch, nada.



The god you seek proof of may not exist in the form that you are
expecting to witness. When I view the Hubble Telescope's famous
image, "Pillars of Creation" I am both awed and humbled. I think
sometimes pure arrogance and self importance can be blinding.

http://i.space.com/images/i/000/044/723/original/pillars-of-creation-eagle-nebula-new-image.jpg?1420556219



It's just too easy and anti-intellectual to pin "creation" on a creator.
There's no evidence of same. There's nothing in the "pillars" photo that
evidences a god.

OR NOT! The more you spin the deeper you get.

--

Respectfully submitted by Justan

Laugh of the day from Krause

"I'm not to blame anymore for the atmosphere in here.
I've been "born again" as a nice guy."

[Mr. Luddite]

On 2/27/2015 7:05 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 7:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/27/2015 6:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"

wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce"
theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



It is interesting that is all you saw in the whole post.
You really are obsessed



There isn't an iota of "proof" for the existence of god. Nothing, zip,
zilch, nada.



The god you seek proof of may not exist in the form that you are
expecting to witness. When I view the Hubble Telescope's famous
image, "Pillars of Creation" I am both awed and humbled. I think
sometimes pure arrogance and self importance can be blinding.

http://i.space.com/images/i/000/044/723/original/pillars-of-creation-eagle-nebula-new-image.jpg?1420556219



It's just too easy and anti-intellectual to pin "creation" on a creator.
There's no evidence of same. There's nothing in the "pillars" photo that
evidences a god.


It's evidence of something. I don't know what that "something" is though.

My earliest recollection (as a young kid) regarding my personal views
is that I never bought into the 6,000 old earth, Adam and Eve and the
literal interpretation of the Biblical account of creationism. Even back
then there was enough scientific knowledge that contradicted the
literal accounts that made a lot more sense. I have always kept my mind
open to a symbolic meaning however, keeping in mind that much was
written before any understanding or even knowledge of the evidence
provided by science.

Bottom line is ... I don't have a clue.