On 2/27/15 7:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/27/2015 6:07 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/27/15 4:43 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 16:08:39 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/27/15 3:58 PM, wrote:
On Fri, 27 Feb 2015 14:49:16 -0500, "Mr. Luddite"
wrote:


Big Bang just a bunch of bunk?

Universe has no beginning?

Maybe it's back to thinking it's made up of ether. Invisible,
just like modern day descriptions of black holes.

http://www.space.com/28681-theory-no-big-bang.html

This is really an unknowable but the understanding of the things we
can know is advancing science. At this point "god did it" is as
provable as the big bang. What was there before the predicted event
13.8 billion years ago? I do tend to lean towards the closed universe
theory and after expanding for a while the whole thing will collapse
back on itself again. That is reconciled with the "bounce" theory. It
also leaves open the likelihood that there are other systems beyond
what we call our universe, doing the same thing.

One thing is certain, the more we find out, the more questions we
bring up and it becomes clearer that there is still more out there
than we ever suspected before.


"god did it"

Right, and Barney Rubble had pet dinosaurs.



It is interesting that is all you saw in the whole post.
You really are obsessed



There isn't an iota of "proof" for the existence of god. Nothing, zip,
zilch, nada.



The god you seek proof of may not exist in the form that you are
expecting to witness. When I view the Hubble Telescope's famous
image, "Pillars of Creation" I am both awed and humbled. I think
sometimes pure arrogance and self importance can be blinding.

http://i.space.com/images/i/000/044/723/original/pillars-of-creation-eagle-nebula-new-image.jpg?1420556219


It's just too easy and anti-intellectual to pin "creation" on a creator.
There's no evidence of same. There's nothing in the "pillars" photo that
evidences a god.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.