I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.


--
Proud to be a Liberal.

The "quiet" .22 is probably more suitable for bolt action or revolver. Unless youu use a lighter recoil spring but then it might have a problem loading the next round

On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 1:33:35 PM UTC-5, Tim wrote:
The "quiet" .22 is probably more suitable for bolt action or revolver. Unless youu use a lighter recoil spring but then it might have a problem loading the next round

My FIL gave me a box of 100 CCI .22 shorts last weekend. Said he'd had them for a while and didn't need them anymore. The only thing I have I can shoot them in would be a cherry 1960's Savage Model 24 in .22/.410 with the selector on the hammer. Everything else is semi-auto LR.

On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.

On 2/12/15 2:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any
yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.


If I had a mag of 10 "quiet" rounds loaded, typically the pistol would
cycle two or three properly, and the rifle, three. I thought the
silencer would have an impact one way or the other, but it doesn't.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/12/15 4:51 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:13 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/15 2:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any
yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.


If I had a mag of 10 "quiet" rounds loaded, typically the pistol would
cycle two or three properly, and the rifle, three. I thought the
silencer would have an impact one way or the other, but it doesn't.

You might try seeing if Ruger has another recoil spring for that Mk
that is a little softer for the light load or just get a new one and
start nipping coils off the one you have. It is really better to get a
softer spring tho. They do make blowback guns that will cycle on
standard velocity shorts. You just have to remember which spring you
have in it. A regular HV .22 will beat the crap out of it otherwise.


It's a captured recoil spring on a rod held together with rivets. The
CCI "Standard" Veloc ammo cycles fine and there's no sonic boom with my
"Sparrow".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGXW5tp71Q



--
Proud to be a Liberal.

wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:08:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/15 4:51 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:13 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/15 2:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any
yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.


If I had a mag of 10 "quiet" rounds loaded, typically the pistol would
cycle two or three properly, and the rifle, three. I thought the
silencer would have an impact one way or the other, but it doesn't.

You might try seeing if Ruger has another recoil spring for that Mk
that is a little softer for the light load or just get a new one and
start nipping coils off the one you have. It is really better to get a
softer spring tho. They do make blowback guns that will cycle on
standard velocity shorts. You just have to remember which spring you
have in it. A regular HV .22 will beat the crap out of it otherwise.


It's a captured recoil spring on a rod held together with rivets. The
CCI "Standard" Veloc ammo cycles fine and there's no sonic boom with my
"Sparrow".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGXW5tp71Q

That Ruger is a strange breed of cat.

It is odd. Works well, shoots well. I like it because it has a steel upper
and lower. The 22/45 models have a polymer lower and feel top heavy to me
but they are very popular.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+

On Thursday, February 12, 2015 at 2:01:03 PM UTC-5, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.

Try the Gemtech ammo I suggested in another post in this thread. It cycles an MP 15-22 just fine.

On 2/12/15 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:33:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.

Have you tried this

http://tinyurl.com/qe5chu2

It seems to cycle my woodsman but I only fired a couple.


Nope. 60-grain .22LR...sounds like fun!
Thanks.

--
Proud to be a Liberal.

On 2/12/2015 12:16 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 2/12/15 12:08 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 11:33:05 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any
yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.

Have you tried this

http://tinyurl.com/qe5chu2

It seems to cycle my woodsman but I only fired a couple.


Nope. 60-grain .22LR...sounds like fun!
Thanks.



I have a Ruger .177 single pump air rifle. It's louder than the
sub sonic .22 rounds. Probably because it's muzzle velocity is
1,200 to 1,400 ft/sec depending on what kind of pellets you use.