Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #11   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default CCI 'Quiet-22' Ammo...not for me.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:53:11 -0500, wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 13:13:22 -0500, Wayne.B
wrote:

On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:08:22 -0500,
wrote:

Have you tried this

http://tinyurl.com/qe5chu2

It seems to cycle my woodsman but I only fired a couple.


===

I've tried them. They cycled OK in my Hi Standard but they didn't
seem to stabilize properly. A fair number of them passed through the
target sideways for some reason.


It may have to do with the twist rate of the rifling. I know the army
had to change the twist rate of the M16s when they went to the heavier
NATO bullet. I think I linked an article about it here a while ago.
I was just popping them off in the screen cage so I did not really see
them hitting paper. I was just curious how quiet they were and if they
would cycle. It is a little quieter than a regular lr or my shot pin
nailer.


===

You really need a suppressor to make them truly quiet. If you want
quiet around the house and don't need a lot of power, an inexpensive
CO2 BB pistol from Walmart is really hard to beat. I have an Umarex
X-B-G which is very effective on pests and also very quiet. The CO2
cartridges last a long time and a bottle of BBs is darn near a
lifetime supply. The muzzle velocity of 410 fps packs a surprising
amount of punch.

https://www.google.com/#q=umarex+x-b-g

http://www.sportsmansguide.com/product/index/umarex-xbg-177-cal-co2-bb-pistol?a=979238
  #12   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default CCI 'Quiet-22' Ammo...not for me.

On 2/12/15 4:51 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:13 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/15 2:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any
yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.



If I had a mag of 10 "quiet" rounds loaded, typically the pistol would
cycle two or three properly, and the rifle, three. I thought the
silencer would have an impact one way or the other, but it doesn't.


You might try seeing if Ruger has another recoil spring for that Mk
that is a little softer for the light load or just get a new one and
start nipping coils off the one you have. It is really better to get a
softer spring tho. They do make blowback guns that will cycle on
standard velocity shorts. You just have to remember which spring you
have in it. A regular HV .22 will beat the crap out of it otherwise.


It's a captured recoil spring on a rod held together with rivets. The
CCI "Standard" Veloc ammo cycles fine and there's no sonic boom with my
"Sparrow".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGXW5tp71Q



--
Proud to be a Liberal.
  #13   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default CCI 'Quiet-22' Ammo...not for me.

wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 17:08:50 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/15 4:51 PM, wrote:
On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 14:16:13 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 2/12/15 2:01 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/12/2015 11:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
I've blown through a small box of 50 rounds of CCI's "quiet-22" ammo and
while it fires properly and is as accurate as it should be, I've
concluded that, as some have reported, it just doesn't have enough of a
powder charge to properly cycle my semi-auto rifle or pistol. It's too
bad, because the stuff usually is inexpensive. I have an almost full
small box left, and I guess I'll give it away.

It'll work fine in a revolver or bolt action rifle, of course, and it is
quieter than the standard charge or hi-velocity .22LR rounds.

So, for the time being, the best rounds for my silencer-equipped
firearms are the CCI Standard Velocity bullets, which have a full powder
charge but are just subsonic. They cycle flawlessly.

Norma makes a round called the Tac-22 which also is slightly subsonic
and is supposed to cycle semi-autos properly. Haven't come across any
yet.

I have to say that the full Volquartsen "accurizing kit" was worth the
time and aggravation of the install, and the barrel I sent off to that
company for threading came back with the job beautifully done. Good
company, good customer service, good prices. If I were interested in
competing seriously in rimfire, I'd get one of the complete Volquartsen
pistols.




I have almost a full box (500 rounds) of sub sonic .22 ammo also. Like
you say, it worked ok in the Ruger revolver I had but doesn't have
enough punch to properly cycle the Ruger SR22 I have. I haven't tried
it in the 10/22 rifle.


If I had a mag of 10 "quiet" rounds loaded, typically the pistol would
cycle two or three properly, and the rifle, three. I thought the
silencer would have an impact one way or the other, but it doesn't.

You might try seeing if Ruger has another recoil spring for that Mk
that is a little softer for the light load or just get a new one and
start nipping coils off the one you have. It is really better to get a
softer spring tho. They do make blowback guns that will cycle on
standard velocity shorts. You just have to remember which spring you
have in it. A regular HV .22 will beat the crap out of it otherwise.


It's a captured recoil spring on a rod held together with rivets. The
CCI "Standard" Veloc ammo cycles fine and there's no sonic boom with my
"Sparrow".

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xKGXW5tp71Q


That Ruger is a strange breed of cat.


It is odd. Works well, shoots well. I like it because it has a steel upper
and lower. The 22/45 models have a polymer lower and feel top heavy to me
but they are very popular.
--
Sent from my iPhone 6+
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WalMart Ammo Poco Loco General 9 February 21st 14 02:46 PM
Looks like ammo is becoming more available... John H[_2_] General 55 August 4th 13 05:15 PM
9mm Ammo for Sale F.O.A.D. General 19 June 18th 13 01:19 AM
9mm Ammo for Sale F.O.A.D. General 1 June 12th 13 09:18 AM
Ammo F.O.A.D. General 11 May 7th 13 12:45 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:20 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017