On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:05:51 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:59:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Volquartsen will thread and crown the barrel on my Ruger Mark III for
$65 and move the front sight cut back on the barrel for an additional
$30. That's the best price I've found and with a reputable company.
Turnaround time is 10 to 14 days...

I bought the silencer to attach to my AR 15/22, which already has a
threaded barrel, but it would be nice to use it on a pistol, too.



Why? :)

===

After telling us for years that he doesn't shoot critters he wants to
make sure that no one catches him at it. Or perhaps he has a Walter
Mittyesque fantasy about becoming a covert assassin and knocking off
his enemies list one by one. Or even more likely he thinks that it
will make him a cool dude at the range.

Of course the most likely of all is that it's just another Harry tale.

On 1/7/15 7:46 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:05:51 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:59:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Volquartsen will thread and crown the barrel on my Ruger Mark III for
$65 and move the front sight cut back on the barrel for an additional
$30. That's the best price I've found and with a reputable company.
Turnaround time is 10 to 14 days...

I bought the silencer to attach to my AR 15/22, which already has a
threaded barrel, but it would be nice to use it on a pistol, too.



Why? :)

===

After telling us for years that he doesn't shoot critters he wants to
make sure that no one catches him at it. Or perhaps he has a Walter
Mittyesque fantasy about becoming a covert assassin and knocking off
his enemies list one by one. Or even more likely he thinks that it
will make him a cool dude at the range.

Of course the most likely of all is that it's just another Harry tale.



Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 7:46 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:05:51 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:59:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Volquartsen will thread and crown the barrel on my Ruger Mark III for
$65 and move the front sight cut back on the barrel for an additional
$30. That's the best price I've found and with a reputable company.
Turnaround time is 10 to 14 days...

I bought the silencer to attach to my AR 15/22, which already has a
threaded barrel, but it would be nice to use it on a pistol, too.



Why? :)

===

After telling us for years that he doesn't shoot critters he wants to
make sure that no one catches him at it. Or perhaps he has a Walter
Mittyesque fantasy about becoming a covert assassin and knocking off
his enemies list one by one. Or even more likely he thinks that it
will make him a cool dude at the range.

Of course the most likely of all is that it's just another Harry tale.



Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 09:46:27 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/7/15 7:46 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 18:05:51 -0500, Poquito Loco
wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 16:59:45 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Volquartsen will thread and crown the barrel on my Ruger Mark III for
$65 and move the front sight cut back on the barrel for an additional
$30. That's the best price I've found and with a reputable company.
Turnaround time is 10 to 14 days...

I bought the silencer to attach to my AR 15/22, which already has a
threaded barrel, but it would be nice to use it on a pistol, too.



Why? :)

===

After telling us for years that he doesn't shoot critters he wants to
make sure that no one catches him at it. Or perhaps he has a Walter
Mittyesque fantasy about becoming a covert assassin and knocking off
his enemies list one by one. Or even more likely he thinks that it
will make him a cool dude at the range.

Of course the most likely of all is that it's just another Harry tale.



Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?

===

Tess Ting say yes.

On 1/8/15 9:46 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?


All I committed to was to not personally insult other posters here,
e.g., not calling you an asshole. "Religion," "Politics," et cetera, are
simply subjects for possible discussion.

Simply pointing out "snarkiness," as it were, without adding frosting to
that cake is NOT personally insulting the snarky person. You of course
are entitled to disagree.

On 1/8/2015 10:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 9:46 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?


All I committed to was to not personally insult other posters here,
e.g., not calling you an asshole. "Religion," "Politics," et cetera, are
simply subjects for possible discussion.

Simply pointing out "snarkiness," as it were, without adding frosting to
that cake is NOT personally insulting the snarky person. You of course
are entitled to disagree.

Oh cut it out... Grow up harry..

On 1/8/15 10:33 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/8/2015 10:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 9:46 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?


All I committed to was to not personally insult other posters here,
e.g., not calling you an asshole. "Religion," "Politics," et cetera, are
simply subjects for possible discussion.

Simply pointing out "snarkiness," as it were, without adding frosting to
that cake is NOT personally insulting the snarky person. You of course
are entitled to disagree.

Oh cut it out... Grow up harry..


Here's a "grown up" quote *from you* from one of your posts from
yesterday, Scotty:

"So ****ing what.. Who the **** are you to even talk about the tone
here. You are a ****ing clown, hurry up the **** and die will you? Holy
****ing ****, you talking about tone here is a joke. Anybody taking you
seriously is a ****ing retard..."


Have a nice day.

On Thursday, 8 January 2015 11:47:33 UTC-4, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:33 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/8/2015 10:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 9:46 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?


All I committed to was to not personally insult other posters here,
e.g., not calling you an asshole. "Religion," "Politics," et cetera, are
simply subjects for possible discussion.

Simply pointing out "snarkiness," as it were, without adding frosting to
that cake is NOT personally insulting the snarky person. You of course
are entitled to disagree.

Oh cut it out... Grow up harry..


Here's a "grown up" quote *from you* from one of your posts from
yesterday, Scotty:

"So ****ing what.. Who the **** are you to even talk about the tone
here. You are a ****ing clown, hurry up the **** and die will you? Holy
****ing ****, you talking about tone here is a joke. Anybody taking you
seriously is a ****ing retard..."


Have a nice day.


I'm really surprised that Sheriff John Brown...er Herring didn't ride in and dispense some good ole fashioned southern vigilante justice when the L'il Snot posted that crap.

On 1/8/2015 10:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:33 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/8/2015 10:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 9:46 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?


All I committed to was to not personally insult other posters here,
e.g., not calling you an asshole. "Religion," "Politics," et cetera, are
simply subjects for possible discussion.

Simply pointing out "snarkiness," as it were, without adding frosting to
that cake is NOT personally insulting the snarky person. You of course
are entitled to disagree.

Oh cut it out... Grow up harry..


Here's a "grown up" quote *from you* from one of your posts from
yesterday, Scotty:

"So ****ing what.. Who the **** are you to even talk about the tone
here. You are a ****ing clown, hurry up the **** and die will you? Holy
****ing ****, you talking about tone here is a joke. Anybody taking you
seriously is a ****ing retard..."


Have a nice day.




FOAD

On 1/8/2015 10:47 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 10:33 AM, KC wrote:
On 1/8/2015 10:30 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/8/15 9:46 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Wed, 07 Jan 2015 19:57:38 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:


Snarky, snarky, snarky, and setting the tone for rec.boats.
Congratulations.

Harry, you started that again with your anti-religion ****. Do you not
recall that? I made a comment about 'behavior' which you called a
'personal insult'.

When you call someone's behavior 'snarky', aren't you in fact making
more 'personal insults'?


All I committed to was to not personally insult other posters here,
e.g., not calling you an asshole. "Religion," "Politics," et cetera, are
simply subjects for possible discussion.

Simply pointing out "snarkiness," as it were, without adding frosting to
that cake is NOT personally insulting the snarky person. You of course
are entitled to disagree.

Oh cut it out... Grow up harry..


Here's a "grown up" quote *from you* from one of your posts from
yesterday, Scotty:

"So ****ing what.. Who the **** are you to even talk about the tone
here. You are a ****ing clown, hurry up the **** and die will you? Holy
****ing ****, you talking about tone here is a joke. Anybody taking you
seriously is a ****ing retard..."


Have a nice day.



Strike the word **** and it was a pretty good post.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan