Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2012
Posts: 610
Default In response to...

On Sunday, January 4, 2015 1:42:43 PM UTC-8, John H. wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.



The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.


Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


On what ever issue Krause may promote or discount, the more I tend to follow or at lease agree with the opposite.
  #43   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default In response to...

On 1/4/15 2:12 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 12:42:38 -0500, KC wrote:

On 1/4/2015 12:02 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 10:22:21 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 1:37 AM,
wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts, I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

I am glad you warned us that your statement was going to be "Specious"
before you started writing it.

If the US is paying $6 Billion a year to prop up the zionists,


Who said we are supporting "Zionists"? Israel is a Nation or a State
isn't it?
we are
establishing religion with our tax dollars. Why is that not a problem
for you?
I guarantee that if there was an evangelical group, funded by the US
tax payer, taking over a country, promoting christianity at the point
of a gun, you would be outraged.


Harry proclaimed Israel to be a Jewish nation.


The leaders of Israel, including the current prime minister, describe
Israel as a Jewish state.
  #44   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default In response to...

On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.



The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.


Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who
believe differently.
  #45   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 824
Default In response to...

On 1/4/2015 7:09 PM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various
posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's
throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it
is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et
cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there
would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there
would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding
fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.


Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who
believe differently.


Wimp.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan



  #46   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default In response to...

Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.


Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who believe differently.


It does not say one nation under Jesus. One national under Allahu Akbar
neither. What ever God floats your boat. Including the Prince of Atheism.
Is inclusive of all deities.
  #47   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 5,832
Default In response to...

On 1/4/15 10:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.

Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who believe differently.


It does not say one nation under Jesus. One national under Allahu Akbar
neither. What ever God floats your boat. Including the Prince of Atheism.
Is inclusive of all deities.


Not relevant or accurate. Those who pushed for the inclusion of the
phrase were christians.
Fortunately a growing number of public schools have recognized the
religious *******ization of "the pledge" and have dropped it from
morning student activities. Religious expressionism has no place in the
public schools.
  #48   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jan 2015
Posts: 824
Default In response to...

On 1/5/2015 6:33 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 10:06 PM, Califbill wrote:
Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various
posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down
people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he
thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it
is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was
not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools,
et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated
there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there
would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding
fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.

Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who
believe differently.


It does not say one nation under Jesus. One national under Allahu Akbar
neither. What ever God floats your boat. Including the Prince of
Atheism.
Is inclusive of all deities.


Not relevant or accurate. Those who pushed for the inclusion of the
phrase were christians.
Fortunately a growing number of public schools have recognized the
religious *******ization of "the pledge" and have dropped it from
morning student activities. Religious expressionism has no place in the
public schools.


Thank the Jehovah Witnesses for getting the words removed.

--


I don't need anger management. I just need people to stop ****ing me off!
Respectfully submitted by Justan

  #49   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Mar 2014
Posts: 2,337
Default In response to...

On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 19:09:04 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.


Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who
believe differently.


Again, how many of the religious conservatives here have forced their
view on you? That's about the dozenth time I've asked you that
question, for which you seem not to have sufficient balls to provide
an answer.

Yet you persist with the same excuses for your bull****.

It's not your politics, Krause, it's your behavior.
  #50   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Dec 2014
Posts: 1,186
Default In response to...

On 1/5/15 8:49 AM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On Sun, 04 Jan 2015 19:09:04 -0500, Keyser Söze
wrote:

On 1/4/15 4:42 PM, Poquito Loco wrote:
On 4 Jan 2015 20:14:11 GMT, Keyser Söze wrote:

Califbill wrote:
Justan Olphart wrote:
On 1/4/2015 10:22 AM, Keyser Söze wrote:
On 1/4/15 1:37 AM, wrote:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 21:39:05 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

Harry, after reading the article and your responses to various posts,
I jist have to ask- are you shoving anti-religion down people's throats?

Just curious...

Harry is against religion everywhere except Israel where he thinks a
direct connection between church and state is acceptable and it is OK
to impose their religious beliefs on the people living there.


Specious.

Israel was established as a Jewish nation. The United States was not
established as a Christian nation.

I am not against religion. I am against religion/religious beliefs
dictating laws, regulations, what is taught in public schools, et cetera.

"One nation under God"


But did not say a Christian God. Actually the founders stated there would
not be a State Religion, ala Church of England. Not that there would be
no religious expression.


The phrase "one nation..." had nothing to do with the founding fathers,
the Declaration, or the Constitution. It was shoved into the "pledge"
during the middle of the last century because of right-wing pressure.

Harry, are you just *trying* to promote friction?


Just stating a bit of history. The phrase in question is a perfect
example of how religious conservatives force their view on those who
believe differently.


Again, how many of the religious conservatives here have forced their
view on you? That's about the dozenth time I've asked you that
question, for which you seem not to have sufficient balls to provide
an answer.

Yet you persist with the same excuses for your bull****.

It's not your politics, Krause, it's your behavior.


Ahh, so you are reverting back to the Herring who posts personal
insults. How sad.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No Response TopBassDog General 60 August 28th 10 05:27 AM
Response Thom Stewart ASA 2 December 20th 06 05:16 PM
OT--Great response! NOYB General 10 August 30th 04 03:12 PM
Response Old Nick Boat Building 0 August 12th 03 05:53 AM
malibu response question J.W. Frank General 26 July 11th 03 02:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017