About Us

KC

On 8/26/2014 9:08 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 26 Aug 2014 10:26:04 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 20:49:49 -0400, wrote:

On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 14:02:48 -0700, jps wrote:

On Sat, 23 Aug 2014 09:33:53 -0400, BAR wrote:

Please explain the cops injuries to his head and face, which occurred
prior to the cop shooting the 6'4" 300 man.

Not the issue. By *all* accounts, the kid was retreating. You cannot
shoot an unarmed person while they're retreating, it's murder.

All of the shots were in the front. If this was in the back I would
agree with you although Missouri does allow a cop to shoot a fleeing
forcible felon. The cop did get the radio call about the "strong
armed robbery" and that is a "B" felony.

Bull****, no connection. The contact had nothing whatsoever to do
with a robbery.

Lie, period...

The cop's story was he got the radio call about the robbery after the
initial encounter and the second encounter when he was assaulted.
That is easily verified by the radio logs so if he is lying it won't
take long to find out

The kid was not a felon, not even a suspect. He dissed a white cop
who felt justified in taking his rage out on that kid. He's a cold
blooded murderer.

Lie, period...

"Dissed" involved a punch in the face, that is felony #2

Witnesses have the cop 20 - 25 feet away.

Half truth, the guy who robbed the store said that.
Cops are not given
permission by MO law to fire on a suspect without their lives being
threatened.

Lie, they can shoot a fleeing felon and once he tried to kill the cop,
he was a "fleeing felon"... Period...
This was murder.

Lie, conjecture based on fantasy and racism..

We really do not know the distance. One "witness:" was the accomplice
in the robbery who had already lied to the police.
Another was inside getting her phone when the shooting actually
occurred. I am not sure what the others say or how well they will hold
up to cross examination. Let's see how all of this matches the crime
scene evidence.
As a general rule, the court believes what a cop says. Ever get a
speeding ticket? What was the evidence?

II don't know where you're getting your information, but it's a bad
source.

Rediculous, how come you keep coming late to the party and still pretend
you have heard no opposing evidence, you are a liar. I have seen your
pattern for years, you are not fooling anybody.

Mostly lawyers on CNN.
The fact still remains that if you attack a cop, you are going to get
shot or,. if there are enough cops around, beaten within an inch of
your life.
That is just true, like it or not. Cops do not tolerate taking a punch
when they are taking a suspect into custody.
If there is any evidence at all that this thug was closing on the cop,
after already assaulting him, he was going to be shot and the law will
back up the cop.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version	Search this Thread: Advanced Search
Display Modes
Switch to Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Threaded Mode

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Possibly NOT photoshopped...	F.O.A.D.	General	5	June 3rd 13 01:25 PM
What could possibly go wrong?	ESAD	General	16	January 23rd 13 01:52 PM
What could possibly go wrong	Oscar	General	0	May 3rd 12 10:32 PM
Can they possibly get stupider?	Frogwatch	General	11	December 31st 09 08:28 PM
possibly a new boat	Jonathan Ganz	ASA	18	September 12th 03 06:21 PM

Menu

About Us