![]() |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
|
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/14, 10:42 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/11/2014 9:59 AM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/11/14, 9:28 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/11/2014 6:13 AM, KC wrote: On 5/11/2014 2:25 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote: Sorry. I thought you were referring to my "smart" comment. As far as guns are concerned, formal education doesn't play into the equation in my mind. Being sane and responsible does. However: In past generations there were many reasons people didn't complete high school. In certain farming regions for example or unique situations where the kids were needed to help support the family. During WWII there were many who dropped out of high school to join the military. Most went on and received at least a GED and many went on to college under the GI bill. In today's world there aren't really many justified reasons for not getting at least a high school diploma. Since the 1960's our welfare and aid to people and families has increased over 700 percent. High tech farming has eliminated most of the grunt work requirements with higher yields. The government pays some farmers *not* to grow some crops. The purpose of getting an education ... even if it's only a high school diploma ... is so one can become self sufficient and a contributing member of society ... not a burden on it. Unfortunately our welfare system has created a culture whereby there is little motivation in many cases because Uncle Sam will provide. Unless someone is mentally disabled, physically disabled or has some boni fide reason for not sticking it out and getting a HS diploma or a GED, I could understand making some federal benefits unavailable. If you can't get a job ... go back to school and the benefits will continue. So, you would disqualify anybody who did not have a HS Diploma from having a weapon? Please note my comment, "As far as guns are concerned, formal education doesn't play into the equation in my mind" however the more I think about it, maybe it should now-a-days, along with certain other rights and benefits normally allowed to responsible, contributing members of society. If someone is 18 years old, dropped out of high school, doesn't have a job or visible means of support .... should they be issued a permit for a handgun? My logic says "No". What does the Constitution say? Some folks like to be in charge and set the rules... Seems the qualifications always ignore their own deficiencies, really seems to be a blue state thing. I don't think bullies should have guns... The Constitution provides for the right to bear arms but it doesn't say that right necessarily extends to everyone. Laws already exist under the framework of the Constitution that nobody argues with because they are common sense interpretations. What state allows selling a hand gun to a 10 year old? What state allows legal selling of a firearm to a convicted felon? I also favor background checks. I also favor prohibiting firearm sales to those with diagnosed physiological disorders or mental illness. A basic education (high school diploma) is supposed to minimally prepare you for the adult world and means of supporting yourself as a contributing member of society. The reasons to drop out now-a-days are more by choice than by necessity and those who drop out are far more likely to become a burden on society rather than a contributing member. My logic says they are more likely to commit crimes to survive, having few other options for making a living. So, again I ask, "Should an 18 year old high school drop out be issued a permit to own a handgun?" I can see valid reasons to answer "No" just like a 10 year old shouldn't own one. You can almost smell the "pride" in having a father who "had the sense" to drop out of school in the third grade. Sad. This has nothing to do with Scott or his father. There was a time in this society where legitimate reasons existed to drop out of school and go to work to help support the extended family. Typically not until after the 6th grade. |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/2014 5:09 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". What in the name of hell are you talking about? You must really be afraid of her to bring up such nonsense. Oh well. I am not "afraid" of her. I just think she's a lying windbag. |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/14, 4:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". I can't believe you fellas are judging Hillary on her mistatements, exaggerations, b.s., whatever. She's a politician. And whatever she says pales in comparison to the crazy nonsense spewed by the 2016 GOP presidential wannabes. Most of those guys are plain bat**** crazy. |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/2014 5:36 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/11/14, 4:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". I can't believe you fellas are judging Hillary on her mistatements, exaggerations, b.s., whatever. She's a politician. And whatever she says pales in comparison to the crazy nonsense spewed by the 2016 GOP presidential wannabes. Most of those guys are plain bat**** crazy. So outright lying and making up stories to garner votes is ok with you if you're a politician? Phew. Amazing the standards by which some are willing to live by. |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/14, 5:41 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 5/11/2014 5:36 PM, F*O*A*D wrote: On 5/11/14, 4:54 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote: On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". I can't believe you fellas are judging Hillary on her mistatements, exaggerations, b.s., whatever. She's a politician. And whatever she says pales in comparison to the crazy nonsense spewed by the 2016 GOP presidential wannabes. Most of those guys are plain bat**** crazy. So outright lying and making up stories to garner votes is ok with you if you're a politician? Phew. Amazing the standards by which some are willing to live by. It's the stock in trade of the GOP. As in, Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Just ask Darryl Issa, who apparently got away with arson. |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/14, 5:09 PM, Boating All Out wrote:
In article , says... On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". What in the name of hell are you talking about? You must really be afraid of her to bring up such nonsense. Oh well. There's no doubt the Republicans are terrified of Mrs. Clinton. |
WTF Happened To My 2nd?
On 5/11/2014 5:51 PM, F*O*A*D wrote:
On 5/11/14, 5:09 PM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... On 5/11/2014 10:43 AM, Boating All Out wrote: In article , says... Her "excuse": "I say a lot of things -- millions of words a day -- so if I misspoke, that was just a misstatement," she said. Sorta like, "What difference does it make". All politicians are liars, or at minimum exaggerators. That goes for Republicans too. Just don't have a target yet. It'll be fun when the target appears. I expect it to be a real big target. Even her "millions of words a day" is a far fetched exaggeration of the truth. Several studies indicate that the average woman speaks about 20,000 words in a 24 hour period. (Men typically speak about 7,000). Assuming that Hillary is not "average", let's give her the benefit of the doubt and double that. No, lets' triple that. Hell, lets make it *10* times more words a day than the average woman. Still not even close to a "million words a day". What in the name of hell are you talking about? You must really be afraid of her to bring up such nonsense. Oh well. There's no doubt the Republicans are terrified of Mrs. Clinton. I doubt "terrified" is an accurate term, but it sure invokes some spin to the cycle. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com