![]() |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On 2/24/2014 9:17 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/24/2014 8:31 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 18:32:00 -0500, F*O*A*D wrote: Never liked the chlorine in pools. Are you saying it isn't used anymore? That's a step in the right direction! A salt water pool still uses chlorine, it just stays "mostly" in the generator vessel. I am amused when people complain about the chlorine tho, A properly balanced pool tests exactly the same as WSSC tap water. I have my routine down to the point that I spend about 10 minutes a week on the pool in the summer. Basically get the pH right, then I drop 2.5 tabs in the pool floater, the other half in the spa floater, shock the pool with a gallon and a half of liquid chlorine. In the winter you can cut that all by half or more. I used to run the cleaner 6 hours every day but now I just run it about once or twice a week. Because you are avoiding swings, you can run lower levels across the board than required in a regular system... Yup. What Gregg is doing is responding to what I'd call a weekly oscillation based on previous experience with three other conventional chlorine pools, especially if he needs to add a gallon or more of liquid chlorine every week. I realize that he's in Florida but during the summer we also have lots of sun and warm to hot temps up here. With the salt system I don't do anything other than have the water tested once a month at the pool store. Once, last year, they recommended adding about a quart of PH "plus" (or maybe it was "minus" .... I can't remember). Other than that it's basically maintenance free. As you mentioned, people who swim in it who are used to conventional chlorine systems almost always comment on how "silky smooth" the water feels. I wouldn't know. I think I went in the pool once last summer. It's mostly guests and grandkids that use it. Next house will not have a pool. |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
|
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On 2/24/2014 9:15 PM, KC wrote:
On 2/24/2014 8:42 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:41:56 -0500, KC wrote: It's awesome swimming in the salted water in our pool... It should be about 5 ppt salt, about the same as the bay, up in the North East spur past Baltimore (or the Potomac around Port Tobacco). Ok... I just poured in what the directions said and it was good... The computer in the chlorinatior took care of the percentages:) Gregg is wrong. I don't know what "ppt" is, but your pool and mine are not salt water. They have a relatively small amount of salt (about 3,000 parts per million or "ppm") that is used to generate chlorine. The bay he is talking about has more like 35,000 parts per million of salt. |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On 2/25/2014 1:41 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:46:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/24/2014 8:42 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:41:56 -0500, KC wrote: It's awesome swimming in the salted water in our pool... It should be about 5 ppt salt, about the same as the bay, up in the North East spur past Baltimore (or the Potomac around Port Tobacco). Huh? Sea water is about 3.7 percent salt or 35,000 parts per million. The salt in a salt water system pool is in the 2,800 to 3,600 parts per million range. It's *not* salt water. They usually use parts per thousand when they talk about bays and oceans. Push that decimal place over 3 and we are on the same page. "ppt" is parts per trillion, not parts per thousand. |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On 2/25/2014 1:34 AM, wrote: We had a pitch at an inspector seminar from one of the engineers who designed one of the first listed salt to chlorine generators. The reaction of NaCl to free chlorine is very short lived and most of the chlorine is recombined very quickly after it leaves the actual generator element so very little circulates in the pool.. That is not really important since it has done the germ killing by then at a very high concentration of Cl. Gregg, think about what this guy claims. The cell is only about 10 inches long and the water flow going through it is very high. It doesn't spend anywhere near the time in the cell to kill off any germs. There's no way one pass through the cell can add enough chlorine to sanitize the water. The sanitation and germ killing takes place because the generated chlorine accumulates and resides in the pool water, not simply the cell. |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On 2/25/14, 6:40 AM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 2/25/2014 1:34 AM, wrote: Here's a picture of what our pool water looks like during the day and at night with the lights on: Day: http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/Eisboch/pool1.jpg Night: http://i802.photobucket.com/albums/yy303/Eisboch/Poolinsummer.jpg Here's a photo of what one of our many swimming pools looks like...complete with a special winter water heating device so our guests can enjoy themselves even when the outside temp is below freezing. Fresh, pure well water with no added chemicals, leaves cleaned out regularly, of course. http://tinyurl.com/kxmyka3 |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:42:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/25/2014 1:41 AM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:46:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/24/2014 8:42 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:41:56 -0500, KC wrote: It's awesome swimming in the salted water in our pool... It should be about 5 ppt salt, about the same as the bay, up in the North East spur past Baltimore (or the Potomac around Port Tobacco). Huh? Sea water is about 3.7 percent salt or 35,000 parts per million. The salt in a salt water system pool is in the 2,800 to 3,600 parts per million range. It's *not* salt water. They usually use parts per thousand when they talk about bays and oceans. Push that decimal place over 3 and we are on the same page. "ppt" is parts per trillion, not parts per thousand. Not the way Greg has been using it. I'm grinning because in many cases your numbers are pretty close, if you divide yours by a thousand or multiply Greg's by a thousand. However, you are right in that 'ppt' normally means 'parts per trillion', at least according to Wikipedia: "Commonly used are ppm (parts-per-million, 10–6), ppb (parts-per-billion, 10–9), ppt (parts-per-trillion, 10–12) and ppq (parts-per-quadrillion, 10-15)." I'll bet the 'parts per thousand' is something used locally down there in Florida - where folks are just a lot smarter than those of us up north. |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On 2/25/2014 8:05 AM, Poco Loco wrote:
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:42:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/25/2014 1:41 AM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:46:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/24/2014 8:42 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:41:56 -0500, KC wrote: It's awesome swimming in the salted water in our pool... It should be about 5 ppt salt, about the same as the bay, up in the North East spur past Baltimore (or the Potomac around Port Tobacco). Huh? Sea water is about 3.7 percent salt or 35,000 parts per million. The salt in a salt water system pool is in the 2,800 to 3,600 parts per million range. It's *not* salt water. They usually use parts per thousand when they talk about bays and oceans. Push that decimal place over 3 and we are on the same page. "ppt" is parts per trillion, not parts per thousand. Not the way Greg has been using it. I'm grinning because in many cases your numbers are pretty close, if you divide yours by a thousand or multiply Greg's by a thousand. However, you are right in that 'ppt' normally means 'parts per trillion', at least according to Wikipedia: "Commonly used are ppm (parts-per-million, 10–6), ppb (parts-per-billion, 10–9), ppt (parts-per-trillion, 10–12) and ppq (parts-per-quadrillion, 10-15)." I'll bet the 'parts per thousand' is something used locally down there in Florida - where folks are just a lot smarter than those of us up north. To make it even more confusing, parts per thousand is usually expressed as "parts per mil". |
The Most Popular Video Right Now...
On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 08:37:24 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote:
On 2/25/2014 8:05 AM, Poco Loco wrote: On Tue, 25 Feb 2014 06:42:08 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/25/2014 1:41 AM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 21:46:14 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 2/24/2014 8:42 PM, wrote: On Mon, 24 Feb 2014 19:41:56 -0500, KC wrote: It's awesome swimming in the salted water in our pool... It should be about 5 ppt salt, about the same as the bay, up in the North East spur past Baltimore (or the Potomac around Port Tobacco). Huh? Sea water is about 3.7 percent salt or 35,000 parts per million. The salt in a salt water system pool is in the 2,800 to 3,600 parts per million range. It's *not* salt water. They usually use parts per thousand when they talk about bays and oceans. Push that decimal place over 3 and we are on the same page. "ppt" is parts per trillion, not parts per thousand. Not the way Greg has been using it. I'm grinning because in many cases your numbers are pretty close, if you divide yours by a thousand or multiply Greg's by a thousand. However, you are right in that 'ppt' normally means 'parts per trillion', at least according to Wikipedia: "Commonly used are ppm (parts-per-million, 10–6), ppb (parts-per-billion, 10–9), ppt (parts-per-trillion, 10–12) and ppq (parts-per-quadrillion, 10-15)." I'll bet the 'parts per thousand' is something used locally down there in Florida - where folks are just a lot smarter than those of us up north. To make it even more confusing, parts per thousand is usually expressed as "parts per mil". If I'd just seen the "parts per mil", I'd be thinking 'parts per milliliter'. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 BoatBanter.com