On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats, eh?

You might presume anything you like.

On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats, eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats, eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the tone
of this newsgroup.

On 1/11/14, 7:12 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:07 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.

No, FlaJim, I'm simply commenting on your recent behavior in here. It's
all about you. My presumption is that based upon your behavior, you
won't be complaining about a negative "tone" here, as you are one of the
ones setting it.

As always, have nice day.

Let the record show that Krause disavows any responsibility for the tone
of this newsgroup.

My comment was about your behavior this year to date, and going forward.
Nothing more, nothing less.

On 1/11/2014 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.


Come on Jim ... give him a chance. He's been pleasant since his return.
Maybe his trip to Africa cleared his mind. If he goes back to his
old ways, that's one thing, but so far, so good.

F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 10:39 AM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:21 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 10:05 AM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 8:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I'm hoping you know this, and your misuse of "you're" is
deliberate. If
not, someone should have been kind enough to tell you by now that
"you're" is the contraction of "you are." The word you want is
"your."

Hope *your* day is spectacular.

Have a nice day.

--
I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans
stop
their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays,
voting
rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of
church
and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency
and common sense.

Forever the asshole. You have back taxes dating back to the mid
nineties.

FYI
Jane Lynch is getting a divorce from her husband, wife, significant
other, partner. or whatever you want to call it. The other party is
seeking 100K monthly alimony. I suppose that's as legitimate as the
sanctity of gay marriage. Right?


Ahh, I see you're still involved in posting personal insults here, and
I'll bet you are among those who wanted rec.boats to be a kinder,
gentler, place, too.

Sorry, but I have no idea who Jane Lynch is. But you seem to know. Is
she some sort of pop star or athlete? I'm not much of a follower of
"pop" culture.

I'll bet you know who Jane Lynch is by now.
What is it exactly that you consider a personal insult?
I'm sorry if I offended you.


No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.
If you really didn't know, I'm 100% sure you Googled her name prior to
this response.

Does it bother you to take a vacation when people who rely on your
unpaid taxes are unable to pay for their dinner?

On 1/11/2014 7:47 PM, Mr. Luddite wrote:
On 1/11/2014 7:02 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:

No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't
figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot
help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will
tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.

She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by
the
mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less
than
a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life.

So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future
whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats,
eh?

You might presume anything you like.

And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here.

Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways?
Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of
playing nice.


Come on Jim ... give him a chance. He's been pleasant since his return.
Maybe his trip to Africa cleared his mind. If he goes back to his
old ways, that's one thing, but so far, so good.



OK I'll give him another chance. ;-)

On 1/11/2014 8:47 PM, Earl wrote:
F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 10:39 AM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:21 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
On 1/11/14, 10:05 AM, Hank wrote:
On 1/11/2014 8:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
I'm hoping you know this, and your misuse of "you're" is
deliberate. If
not, someone should have been kind enough to tell you by now that
"you're" is the contraction of "you are." The word you want is
"your."

Hope *your* day is spectacular.

Have a nice day.

--
I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans
stop
their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays,
voting
rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of
church
and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency
and common sense.

Forever the asshole. You have back taxes dating back to the mid
nineties.

FYI
Jane Lynch is getting a divorce from her husband, wife, significant
other, partner. or whatever you want to call it. The other party is
seeking 100K monthly alimony. I suppose that's as legitimate as the
sanctity of gay marriage. Right?


Ahh, I see you're still involved in posting personal insults here, and
I'll bet you are among those who wanted rec.boats to be a kinder,
gentler, place, too.

Sorry, but I have no idea who Jane Lynch is. But you seem to know. Is
she some sort of pop star or athlete? I'm not much of a follower of
"pop" culture.

I'll bet you know who Jane Lynch is by now.
What is it exactly that you consider a personal insult?
I'm sorry if I offended you.


No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure
out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I
cannot help you.

Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell
us all who she is and why she is important to you.
If you really didn't know, I'm 100% sure you Googled her name prior to
this response.

Does it bother you to take a vacation when people who rely on your
unpaid taxes are unable to pay for their dinner?

We know how that feels.... sitting here turning down the heat while
tenants are sitting in our home, watching a 52 inch tv, playing the
latest HALO 3d gaming system, not paying rent, and refusing to leave....
We are ****ing numb over this crap, they have been living there for free
since October....