Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#61
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote:
Tim wrote: That's why you arm up in int'l water. The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity. That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship. The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire. People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit. |
#62
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote:
On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote: Tim wrote: That's why you arm up in int'l water. The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity. That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship. The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire. People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit. But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going to happen? |
#63
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 14:35:29 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
Yup. Train a couple to operate the .50. They're not difficult to operate, or clear, if there's a jam. -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! Once again, you are dismissing the fact that most pirate boardings take place at night, when those on the large ship cannot see the pirate boats. What are you going to be shooting at with those weapons? Passing waves? === That's nonsense. There are many excellent night vision and infrared detection devices available - reasonably priced also. |
#64
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 23:27:56 -0500, KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote: Tim wrote: That's why you arm up in int'l water. The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity. That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship. The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire. People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit. But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going to happen? Shippers would have a choice of buying or not buying the insurance. -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! |
#66
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
|
#67
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 21:42:12 -0500, "F.O.A.D." wrote:
On 1/11/14, 9:13 PM, Poco Loco wrote: On Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:47:03 -0500, "Mr. Luddite" wrote: On 1/11/2014 7:02 PM, Hank wrote: On 1/11/2014 6:47 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 1/11/14, 6:36 PM, Hank wrote: On 1/11/2014 2:33 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 1/11/14, 1:35 PM, Hank wrote: On 1/11/2014 10:47 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I cannot help you. Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell us all who she is and why she is important to you. She is googleable just like everything else. If you are insulted by the mention of your sketchy financial history then you deserve no less than a daily dose of reminders. Serves you right for being a low life. So, might we presume that *you* won't be one of those in the future whining about the "tone" and name-calling and suchlike in rec.boats, eh? You might presume anything you like. And I will, based upon your recent behavior in here. Are you looking for an excuse to fall back to your old ways? Historically, you haven't needed one after your short term act of playing nice. Come on Jim ... give him a chance. He's been pleasant since his return. Maybe his trip to Africa cleared his mind. If he goes back to his old ways, that's one thing, but so far, so good. I agree. We should overlook his religious sarcasm...this time. -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! Is religious sarcasm any better or worse than, say, ethnic or racial sarcasm? Just asking. For you, the last two aren't as big a problem, except for your continuous attacks on Americans. Let's just forget it for now. As Luddite says, you've been pleasant since your return. -- Hope you're having a spectacular day! |
#68
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
On 1/11/2014 11:27 PM, KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:56 PM, Tim wrote: On Saturday, January 11, 2014 9:03:29 PM UTC-6, Califbill wrote: Tim wrote: That's why you arm up in int'l water. The problem is you have enter a port sometimes. Maybe the answer is a Ma deuce rental service. Pick up your .50 as you reach international waters and turn it in before entering port. Business opportunity. That's what I was meaning. Have a contract securities comp[any that boards in the in'tl- Rides shotgun with the host cargo carrier, then before reaching the destination port, depart the vessel. and wait for return ship. The securities craft could float off the coast for quite an extended period of time just waiting for a hire. People may say that the project would cost a tremendous amount of money, but then again. Millions of tribute paid to terrorists costs far more. Besides- sooner or later (probably sooner) the pirates would get life figured out and quit. But when you think about it, what are the odds of "your" ship being pirated? How many thousands of dollars a load are you going to pay to protect yourself from something that is almost statistically, not going to happen? Same reasoning could be applied to concealed carry, but concealed carry seems to be working. |
#69
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 10:03 PM, Califbill wrote: KC wrote: On 1/10/2014 9:52 PM, John H. wrote: On Friday, January 10, 2014 8:10:13 PM UTC-5, KC wrote: On 1/10/2014 7:28 PM, Tim wrote: On Friday, January 10, 2014 7:59:27 AM UTC-6, John H. wrote: On Thu, 9 Jan 2014 21:19:12 -0800 (PST), Tim wrote: A "LAWS" wouldn't hurt either. Well, depends on which end your on... Their effective range is pretty short, well within AK-47 range. Colonel William Prescott "Don't fire till you see the whites of their eyes!" The problem with fighting back with small arms or rockets, is they can stand off a ways and sink you with theirs a lot easier than you can hit them in their tiny boats... or run a cable and disable you, then hit you with the rockets...That is what I heard anyway, as a reason why the bigger ships just can't fight them off with small arms.... The .50 cal machine gun can shoot a mile off. Being a machine gun, it can put a lot of rounds on target. Why they don't put one on every ship is beyond me. Because it would escalate, the pirates would swarm with rockets and it only takes one to get to the big ship hull and it's over... Either way, they do not want that escalation, I think they would rather have the ship be taken, and then fight with professionals, on known ground rather than even professionals fighting after being surprised on the open ocean... It the incident they made the movie about, the US special forces "fought" (blew the suckers heads off) after making the circumstances, and setting the playing field... No innocents got hurt, the ship was not damaged... And the moment they rocketed a ship, the world opinion would support mass extermination in their home hood. Are you sure about that.. I mean, we haven't even fired anybody after having our Embassy overrun and 4 Americans killed.... Just sayin'. That's government stuff. Not having to pay more because your shoe delivery was hijacked. |
#70
posted to rec.boats
|
|||
|
|||
"0" Pirating last year?
KC wrote:
On 1/11/2014 8:47 PM, Earl wrote: F.O.A.D. wrote: On 1/11/14, 10:39 AM, Hank wrote: On 1/11/2014 10:21 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: On 1/11/14, 10:05 AM, Hank wrote: On 1/11/2014 8:55 AM, F.O.A.D. wrote: I'm hoping you know this, and your misuse of "you're" is deliberate. If not, someone should have been kind enough to tell you by now that "you're" is the contraction of "you are." The word you want is "your." Hope *your* day is spectacular. Have a nice day. -- I’ll be delighted to stop my war on religion when the Republicans stop their war on women, workers, unions, teachers, textbooks, gays, voting rights, minorities, science, the environment, the separation of church and state, the poor, the unemployed, the middle class, common decency and common sense. Forever the asshole. You have back taxes dating back to the mid nineties. FYI Jane Lynch is getting a divorce from her husband, wife, significant other, partner. or whatever you want to call it. The other party is seeking 100K monthly alimony. I suppose that's as legitimate as the sanctity of gay marriage. Right? Ahh, I see you're still involved in posting personal insults here, and I'll bet you are among those who wanted rec.boats to be a kinder, gentler, place, too. Sorry, but I have no idea who Jane Lynch is. But you seem to know. Is she some sort of pop star or athlete? I'm not much of a follower of "pop" culture. I'll bet you know who Jane Lynch is by now. What is it exactly that you consider a personal insult? I'm sorry if I offended you. No, FlaJim. I have no idea who Jane Lynch is, and if you can't figure out if what you post is personally insulting, then I am afraid I cannot help you. Since you obviously are familiar with Ms. Lynch, perhaps you will tell us all who she is and why she is important to you. If you really didn't know, I'm 100% sure you Googled her name prior to this response. Does it bother you to take a vacation when people who rely on your unpaid taxes are unable to pay for their dinner? We know how that feels.... sitting here turning down the heat while tenants are sitting in our home, watching a 52 inch tv, playing the latest HALO 3d gaming system, not paying rent, and refusing to leave.... We are ****ing numb over this crap, they have been living there for free since October.... They should be gone soon, right? Cut the power, water, and/or cable. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Zimmerman's lawyers quit, claim former client "erratic," and "shaky." | General | |||
" Butt Plug Junior" Ingersoll...rec boats latest "stalker " | General | |||
Would Sotomayor Exonerate Bill Richardson & His "Moving AmericaForward" "Latino Voter Registration" Scam? | General | |||
Coelan...10 year plus "varnish" | Boat Building |