Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Speaking of guns and horses

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:48:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:22 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The Pilgrims weren't the "Founding Fathers".

They were "Flounder Fathers".

Sure they were founding fathers. What would make you think they weren't?
Is there some written classification regarding what is considered
founding fathers, or who gets to make that judgment?


===

The pilgrims were here almost 150 years before the declaration of
independence, revolutionary war and the writing/ratification of the
constitution. The people behind those actions are without doubt the
founding fathers.


Where is this definition of "founding fathers"?


===

I just gave it to you. Try to pay attention in class.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Speaking of guns and horses

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:48:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:48:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:22 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The Pilgrims weren't the "Founding Fathers".

They were "Flounder Fathers".

Sure they were founding fathers. What would make you think they weren't?
Is there some written classification regarding what is considered
founding fathers, or who gets to make that judgment?

===

The pilgrims were here almost 150 years before the declaration of
independence, revolutionary war and the writing/ratification of the
constitution. The people behind those actions are without doubt the
founding fathers.

Where is this definition of "founding fathers"?


===

I just gave it to you. Try to pay attention in class.


Oh, so YOU get to define the phrase, eh? The pilgrims definitely had an
impact on the founding of our county. They settled the area first and
established it as viable for western civilization. They created
covenants and laws and developed the area, and usually made inroads with
the local native population.


===

I would argue that although the pilgrims were among the first settlers
they had only a small impact on the country as we know it. There were
other groups right behind the pilgrims who were not religious zealots
and had much more pragmatic reasons for settling the country. Virginia
with its House of Burgesses certainly had much more influence on our
modern governmental institutions.
  #4   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2013
Posts: 877
Default Speaking of guns and horses

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:48:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:48:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:22 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The Pilgrims weren't the "Founding Fathers".

They were "Flounder Fathers".

Sure they were founding fathers. What would make you think they weren't?
Is there some written classification regarding what is considered
founding fathers, or who gets to make that judgment?

===

The pilgrims were here almost 150 years before the declaration of
independence, revolutionary war and the writing/ratification of the
constitution. The people behind those actions are without doubt the
founding fathers.

Where is this definition of "founding fathers"?

===

I just gave it to you. Try to pay attention in class.


Oh, so YOU get to define the phrase, eh? The pilgrims definitely had an
impact on the founding of our county. They settled the area first and
established it as viable for western civilization. They created
covenants and laws and developed the area, and usually made inroads with
the local native population.


===

I would argue that although the pilgrims were among the first settlers
they had only a small impact on the country as we know it. There were
other groups right behind the pilgrims who were not religious zealots
and had much more pragmatic reasons for settling the country. Virginia
with its House of Burgesses certainly had much more influence on our
modern governmental institutions.


But that doesn't mean that no one except the forgers of the Constitution
were "founding fathers".... The pilgrims had a big influence on the
framers, they were the first ones to draft covenants and laws! The
decisions of the pilgrims was true democracy in action. They wanted to
create a society in which their freedoms would survive without
persecution. The Mayflower Compact created the very government that
allowed the people to have a voice in state affairs! I'd say that is
quite an impact on "founding" our country and our values.
  #5   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Speaking of guns and horses

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:48:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:48:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:22 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The Pilgrims weren't the "Founding Fathers".

They were "Flounder Fathers".

Sure they were founding fathers. What would make you think they weren't?
Is there some written classification regarding what is considered
founding fathers, or who gets to make that judgment?

===

The pilgrims were here almost 150 years before the declaration of
independence, revolutionary war and the writing/ratification of the
constitution. The people behind those actions are without doubt the
founding fathers.

Where is this definition of "founding fathers"?

===

I just gave it to you. Try to pay attention in class.

Oh, so YOU get to define the phrase, eh? The pilgrims definitely had an
impact on the founding of our county. They settled the area first and
established it as viable for western civilization. They created
covenants and laws and developed the area, and usually made inroads with
the local native population.


===

I would argue that although the pilgrims were among the first settlers
they had only a small impact on the country as we know it. There were
other groups right behind the pilgrims who were not religious zealots
and had much more pragmatic reasons for settling the country. Virginia
with its House of Burgesses certainly had much more influence on our
modern governmental institutions.


But that doesn't mean that no one except the forgers of the Constitution
were "founding fathers".... The pilgrims had a big influence on the
framers, they were the first ones to draft covenants and laws! The
decisions of the pilgrims was true democracy in action. They wanted to
create a society in which their freedoms would survive without
persecution. The Mayflower Compact created the very government that
allowed the people to have a voice in state affairs! I'd say that is
quite an impact on "founding" our country and our values.


Under your supposition the writers of the Magna Carta are Founding Fathers.


  #6   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2013
Posts: 877
Default Speaking of guns and horses

In article 560080384406176244.219603bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:48:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:48:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:22 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The Pilgrims weren't the "Founding Fathers".

They were "Flounder Fathers".

Sure they were founding fathers. What would make you think they weren't?
Is there some written classification regarding what is considered
founding fathers, or who gets to make that judgment?

===

The pilgrims were here almost 150 years before the declaration of
independence, revolutionary war and the writing/ratification of the
constitution. The people behind those actions are without doubt the
founding fathers.

Where is this definition of "founding fathers"?

===

I just gave it to you. Try to pay attention in class.

Oh, so YOU get to define the phrase, eh? The pilgrims definitely had an
impact on the founding of our county. They settled the area first and
established it as viable for western civilization. They created
covenants and laws and developed the area, and usually made inroads with
the local native population.

===

I would argue that although the pilgrims were among the first settlers
they had only a small impact on the country as we know it. There were
other groups right behind the pilgrims who were not religious zealots
and had much more pragmatic reasons for settling the country. Virginia
with its House of Burgesses certainly had much more influence on our
modern governmental institutions.


But that doesn't mean that no one except the forgers of the Constitution
were "founding fathers".... The pilgrims had a big influence on the
framers, they were the first ones to draft covenants and laws! The
decisions of the pilgrims was true democracy in action. They wanted to
create a society in which their freedoms would survive without
persecution. The Mayflower Compact created the very government that
allowed the people to have a voice in state affairs! I'd say that is
quite an impact on "founding" our country and our values.


Under your supposition the writers of the Magna Carta are Founding Fathers.


Well, no, but I really should have expected some far-flung bull**** from
you!
  #7   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2008
Posts: 8,637
Default Speaking of guns and horses

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:34:02 -0500, Wayne.B wrote:

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:48:41 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:48:58 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:41:22 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

The Pilgrims weren't the "Founding Fathers".

They were "Flounder Fathers".

Sure they were founding fathers. What would make you think they weren't?
Is there some written classification regarding what is considered
founding fathers, or who gets to make that judgment?

===

The pilgrims were here almost 150 years before the declaration of
independence, revolutionary war and the writing/ratification of the
constitution. The people behind those actions are without doubt the
founding fathers.

Where is this definition of "founding fathers"?

===

I just gave it to you. Try to pay attention in class.


Oh, so YOU get to define the phrase, eh? The pilgrims definitely had an
impact on the founding of our county. They settled the area first and
established it as viable for western civilization. They created
covenants and laws and developed the area, and usually made inroads with
the local native population.


===

I would argue that although the pilgrims were among the first settlers
they had only a small impact on the country as we know it. There were
other groups right behind the pilgrims who were not religious zealots
and had much more pragmatic reasons for settling the country. Virginia
with its House of Burgesses certainly had much more influence on our
modern governmental institutions.


You surely won't get any argument out of Loogy with that statement.

John H. -- Hope you're having a great day!


  #8   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 10,492
Default Speaking of guns and horses

On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:54:02 -0500, John H
wrote:

You surely won't get any argument out of Loogy with that statement.


===

You've got to be kidding. :-)
  #9   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Aug 2013
Posts: 6,972
Default Speaking of guns and horses

On 11/14/2013 6:11 PM, Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:54:02 -0500, John H
wrote:

You surely won't get any argument out of Loogy with that statement.


===

You've got to be kidding. :-)


LOL
  #10   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default Speaking of guns and horses

Wayne.B wrote:
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:54:02 -0500, John H
wrote:

You surely won't get any argument out of Loogy with that statement.


===

You've got to be kidding. :-)


Good thing the iPad screen is semi water proof.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Speaking of guns Salmonbait[_2_] General 15 February 9th 13 11:50 PM
Lock up those horses... Don White General 18 December 3rd 08 07:55 PM
Speaking of guns .. Eisboch General 21 October 28th 08 08:24 PM
White Horses Carey Robson Touring 0 December 19th 03 05:00 PM
White Horses Carey Robson UK Paddle 0 December 19th 03 05:00 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:16 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017