Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/2013 2:16 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/11/2013 12:39 PM, J Herring wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 16:23:45 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:50:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 10:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:17:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 10:12 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:30:26 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:



"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:06:53 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:

Details at 11.

Something is better than nothing! (I ****ing hope so anyway!)

I must have missed the constitution amendment process?

--------------------------------------

The Constitution says you have the right to bear arms and you do.

The Constitution says we all have the right to keep and bear arms.

-------------------------------------------------

Are you saying that right also extends to convicted felons, people
with serious mental health issues, alcoholics and drug addicts?


The Constitution does not exclude them.

But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights.
Those with serious mental health
issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or
society. Alcoholics and drug
addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are
going to provide lists of members.
And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a member.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like Virginia, but in
Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a
questionnaire for the state police on which you state under criminal
penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are engaging in a
straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of violence,
whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of domestic violence,
whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether you've
been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a habitual
drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is denied and
you might get arrested.

Anyone here a heavy drinker?



Completion of the ATF Form 4473 is a requirement in Virginia. I
would assume the same is true of
Maryland, as it's a Federal form. But who knows? Maryland may have
its own form which asks the same
questions.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


Maryland has its own form. Two pages, one for the applicant, one for the
dealer. Similar and duplicative in many areas of federal form. Remember,
in Maryland, the state police get involved in your app to buy a pistol.

Well, that explains it then. Now I know why Maryland is such a safe
state in which to reside. Well,
except for certain parts, that is. If I were walking through PG County
or B'more at night, I'd damn
sure consider that a 'special circumstance'!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



I know this will be difficult for a racist bigot like you to understand,
Herring, but there are some beautiful, rural areas of PG County that are
much nicer than where you live but where decent people do live and
aren't particularly impacted by street crime. We dine at a couple of
locally owned restaurants in PG County, and never feel any "fear."

Harry, must you always resort to name-calling. Does your continuous
reference to the MS-13 gangs
overrunning Fairfax County not make you just as much a racist bigot? I've
driven through PG County
quite often. You're right, there are some pretty, rural areas there. But,
if my car broke down at
2AM in one of those pretty, rural areas, I'd definitely consider that a
special circumstance!


We've been in Baltimore many fine days and evenings in all parts of the
city, and have never been accosted or even felt like we were under a
threat. A few weeks ago, while returning home from National Airport one
evening, the Suitland Parkway was blocked because of an accident, and we
had to detour to a part of DC/Maryland you would consider dangerous. I
got a bit lost and stopped at a convenience store/gas station to get out
and ask for directions. I said "hi" to the guys milling around and they
said "hi" back. No sweat.

I think your white man's culture of privilege is blinding you.


You are so brave! What a man, Harry. No wonder Donnie is so enthralled!
Yes, I've been to Baltimore
also. There are some beautiful spots in that fine town. There are also
some spots I would not want
to find myself at 2AM. But then again, I'm not you.

Actually, it's the continuous reporting of the crime in PG County and
B'more that's blinding me.

I'm guessing the special circumstances were a walk in your back yard
where all the 'critters' and
the owls live. Hell, I can understand your having a round chambered under those 'special
circumstances'.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

It must be awful to be as afraid of people as you are.

Well, I've never walked around with a round chambered because of
'special circumstances' - at least
in this country anyway.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


LOL!

What are laughing at, moron?


You, pedophile...

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/2013 2:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
J Herring wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 17:07:35 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:53:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 11:39 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:




The Constitution does not exclude them.

But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights. Those
with serious mental health
issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or
society. Alcoholics and drug
addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are going
to provide lists of members.
And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a member.



I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like Virginia, but in
Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a
questionnaire for the state police on which you state under criminal
penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are engaging in a
straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of violence,
whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of domestic violence,
whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether you've
been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a habitual
drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is denied and
you might get arrested.

Anyone here a heavy drinker?

---------------------------------------------------------

Same here in MA. As I mentioned to John in another post habitual use
of drugs and/or alcohol can be cause for denial of a permit, but also
every time you buy a firearm from a dealer, a form similar to the one
you described .... probably the same one .... must be filled out. It
specifically asks about drug and alcohol abuse.





I have a difficult time understanding why so many on the right so
violently oppose just about anything that relates to throttling down gun
violence. I don't accept the fact that "Americans are just plain violent
and gun laws will never do anything to stop it."


Actually, the reasons are the same as the ones used by those on the left
who oppose just about
....etc. If you call something a fact, what is there to not accept about
it? It is a fact that there
are some crazy-assed folks out there who will kill people - with guns or
not with guns. A majority
of those on the right, including a majority of NRA members, agree with
the background checks. Many
of the other laws, such as the majority of the rules passed by Maryland,
are simply stupid. They'd
have done nothing to prevent the last child massacre.

However, a janitor with a concealed carry permit could have prevented it.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

Mythical. The secret service and armed police could not prevent the
near-assassination of Reagan. What would you expect from a janitor whose
other job was to safeguard a large school full of kids.

No one mentioned anything about the janitor having 'another job', only a
permit to carry a concealed
weapon. And, not necessarily a janitor. An armed guidance counselor could
have done as well.

Shoot the gunner before he shot up twenty kids. Using your analogy, why
have *any* security at the
schools or any type of gun control if in one instance it can be overcome?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

You make a lot of assumptions but ignore the issues.


What we do know is in almost every mass shooting since 1980, the
shooters stopped or killed themselves as soon as they were encountered
or reasonably challenged... Several cases would have been stopped just
by the presence of another armed guard or teacher, etc...

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/2013 2:29 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:


Mexican and Latino are racial to racists like you.

For the life of me, I can't figger out what that sentence means

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/2013 2:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
J Herring wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 17:07:35 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:53:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 11:39 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch" wrote:




The Constitution does not exclude them.

But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights. Those
with serious mental health
issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or
society. Alcoholics and drug
addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are going
to provide lists of members.
And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a member.



I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like Virginia, but in
Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a
questionnaire for the state police on which you state under criminal
penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are engaging in a
straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of violence,
whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of domestic violence,
whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether you've
been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a habitual
drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is denied and
you might get arrested.

Anyone here a heavy drinker?

---------------------------------------------------------

Same here in MA. As I mentioned to John in another post habitual use
of drugs and/or alcohol can be cause for denial of a permit, but also
every time you buy a firearm from a dealer, a form similar to the one
you described .... probably the same one .... must be filled out. It
specifically asks about drug and alcohol abuse.





I have a difficult time understanding why so many on the right so
violently oppose just about anything that relates to throttling down gun
violence. I don't accept the fact that "Americans are just plain violent
and gun laws will never do anything to stop it."


Actually, the reasons are the same as the ones used by those on the left
who oppose just about
....etc. If you call something a fact, what is there to not accept about
it? It is a fact that there
are some crazy-assed folks out there who will kill people - with guns or
not with guns. A majority
of those on the right, including a majority of NRA members, agree with
the background checks. Many
of the other laws, such as the majority of the rules passed by Maryland,
are simply stupid. They'd
have done nothing to prevent the last child massacre.

However, a janitor with a concealed carry permit could have prevented it.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

Mythical. The secret service and armed police could not prevent the
near-assassination of Reagan. What would you expect from a janitor whose
other job was to safeguard a large school full of kids.

No one mentioned anything about the janitor having 'another job', only a
permit to carry a concealed
weapon. And, not necessarily a janitor. An armed guidance counselor could
have done as well.

Shoot the gunner before he shot up twenty kids. Using your analogy, why
have *any* security at the
schools or any type of gun control if in one instance it can be overcome?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

You make a lot of assumptions but ignore the issues.


The average number of people killed in mass shootings when stopped by
police is 14.29

The average number of people killed in a mass shooting when stopped by a
civilian is 2.33

From the article he
http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31...ge-statistics/


Have a happy day harry, please keep playing with your guns...

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/13 3:42 PM, wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 17:10:13 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

That is not really true. They are mostly Latino originating in
Salvador but I understand they have recruited some black members

I also know they are very active in Eastern Montgomery and Northern PG
county (areas adjacent to the DC line) but this is spreading all the
way down into Charles County according to my Niece in Bryans Road.


I am very happy that I have put 1300 miles between me and that area.

Latino is not a race.

True but it is considered to be an ethnic group.



It is specifically an ethnolinguistic category and as you correctly
point out, certainly is not racial, not with all the "flavors" of
peoples who fall into it.

We have lots of hard-working Latinos in this county, some of whom live
in the county and some who commute in daily. The ones I see at WaWa in
the morning, filling their coolers, typically are very friendly, and
tolerate my no better than pidgin Spanish. My wife has a number of
Spanish-speaking patients, and she has gotten very fluent. That's the
way to do it, of course...speak it a lot with people whose native
language it is.

I don't see these people as any different than my relatives who came
here around the turn of the last century. They've come for the same
reasons, to create a better life for their families. They're certainly
not people to be feared because many of them don't speak English yet.

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/13 3:55 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/11/2013 2:16 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/11/2013 12:39 PM, J Herring wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 16:23:45 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:50:25 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 4/11/13 10:32 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 10:17:18 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 4/11/13 10:12 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 09:30:26 -0400, "F.O.A.D."
wrote:

On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:



"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

"BAR" wrote in message
. ..

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 10 Apr 2013 09:06:53 -0400, "Eisboch"

wrote:

Details at 11.

Something is better than nothing! (I ****ing hope so
anyway!)

I must have missed the constitution amendment process?

--------------------------------------

The Constitution says you have the right to bear arms and
you do.

The Constitution says we all have the right to keep and
bear arms.

-------------------------------------------------

Are you saying that right also extends to convicted felons,
people
with serious mental health issues, alcoholics and drug
addicts?


The Constitution does not exclude them.

But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights.
Those with serious mental health
issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or
society. Alcoholics and drug
addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are
going to provide lists of members.
And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a
member.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like
Virginia, but in
Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a
questionnaire for the state police on which you state under
criminal
penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are
engaging in a
straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of
violence,
whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of
domestic violence,
whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether
you've
been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a
habitual
drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is
denied and
you might get arrested.

Anyone here a heavy drinker?



Completion of the ATF Form 4473 is a requirement in Virginia. I
would assume the same is true of
Maryland, as it's a Federal form. But who knows? Maryland may
have
its own form which asks the same
questions.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


Maryland has its own form. Two pages, one for the applicant,
one for the
dealer. Similar and duplicative in many areas of federal form.
Remember,
in Maryland, the state police get involved in your app to buy a
pistol.

Well, that explains it then. Now I know why Maryland is such a safe
state in which to reside. Well,
except for certain parts, that is. If I were walking through PG
County
or B'more at night, I'd damn
sure consider that a 'special circumstance'!


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.



I know this will be difficult for a racist bigot like you to
understand,
Herring, but there are some beautiful, rural areas of PG County
that are
much nicer than where you live but where decent people do live and
aren't particularly impacted by street crime. We dine at a couple of
locally owned restaurants in PG County, and never feel any "fear."

Harry, must you always resort to name-calling. Does your continuous
reference to the MS-13 gangs
overrunning Fairfax County not make you just as much a racist
bigot? I've
driven through PG County
quite often. You're right, there are some pretty, rural areas
there. But,
if my car broke down at
2AM in one of those pretty, rural areas, I'd definitely consider
that a
special circumstance!


We've been in Baltimore many fine days and evenings in all parts
of the
city, and have never been accosted or even felt like we were under a
threat. A few weeks ago, while returning home from National
Airport one
evening, the Suitland Parkway was blocked because of an accident,
and we
had to detour to a part of DC/Maryland you would consider
dangerous. I
got a bit lost and stopped at a convenience store/gas station to
get out
and ask for directions. I said "hi" to the guys milling around
and they
said "hi" back. No sweat.

I think your white man's culture of privilege is blinding you.


You are so brave! What a man, Harry. No wonder Donnie is so
enthralled!
Yes, I've been to Baltimore
also. There are some beautiful spots in that fine town. There are
also
some spots I would not want
to find myself at 2AM. But then again, I'm not you.

Actually, it's the continuous reporting of the crime in PG County and
B'more that's blinding me.

I'm guessing the special circumstances were a walk in your back yard
where all the 'critters' and
the owls live. Hell, I can understand your having a round
chambered under those 'special
circumstances'.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

It must be awful to be as afraid of people as you are.

Well, I've never walked around with a round chambered because of
'special circumstances' - at least
in this country anyway.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.


LOL!

What are laughing at, moron?


You, pedophile...


Oh, we're back to that one again. Your daily dose of anti-psychotic meds
worn off already?

What are you going to do when your darling girl bike racer discovers
there are men out their who can hold a job and provide for a family, and
leaves you to your misery?

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/13 3:57 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/11/2013 2:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
J Herring wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 17:07:35 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:53:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 11:39 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:




The Constitution does not exclude them.

But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights.
Those
with serious mental health
issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or
society. Alcoholics and drug
addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are
going
to provide lists of members.
And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a member.



I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like Virginia,
but in
Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a
questionnaire for the state police on which you state under criminal
penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are engaging
in a
straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of
violence,
whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of domestic
violence,
whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether you've
been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a habitual
drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is denied
and
you might get arrested.

Anyone here a heavy drinker?

---------------------------------------------------------

Same here in MA. As I mentioned to John in another post
habitual use
of drugs and/or alcohol can be cause for denial of a permit, but
also
every time you buy a firearm from a dealer, a form similar to the
one
you described .... probably the same one .... must be filled
out. It
specifically asks about drug and alcohol abuse.





I have a difficult time understanding why so many on the right so
violently oppose just about anything that relates to throttling
down gun
violence. I don't accept the fact that "Americans are just plain
violent
and gun laws will never do anything to stop it."


Actually, the reasons are the same as the ones used by those on the
left
who oppose just about
....etc. If you call something a fact, what is there to not accept
about
it? It is a fact that there
are some crazy-assed folks out there who will kill people - with
guns or
not with guns. A majority
of those on the right, including a majority of NRA members, agree with
the background checks. Many
of the other laws, such as the majority of the rules passed by
Maryland,
are simply stupid. They'd
have done nothing to prevent the last child massacre.

However, a janitor with a concealed carry permit could have
prevented it.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

Mythical. The secret service and armed police could not prevent the
near-assassination of Reagan. What would you expect from a janitor
whose
other job was to safeguard a large school full of kids.

No one mentioned anything about the janitor having 'another job', only a
permit to carry a concealed
weapon. And, not necessarily a janitor. An armed guidance counselor
could
have done as well.

Shoot the gunner before he shot up twenty kids. Using your analogy, why
have *any* security at the
schools or any type of gun control if in one instance it can be
overcome?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

You make a lot of assumptions but ignore the issues.


What we do know is in almost every mass shooting since 1980, the
shooters stopped or killed themselves as soon as they were encountered
or reasonably challenged... Several cases would have been stopped just
by the presence of another armed guard or teacher, etc...


How the hell would you know that?

Gun control deal done
 

On 4/11/13 4:02 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 4/11/2013 2:27 PM, F.O.A.D. wrote:
J Herring wrote:
On 11 Apr 2013 17:07:35 GMT, F.O.A.D. wrote:

J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 11:53:07 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 11:39 AM, Eisboch wrote:


"F.O.A.D." wrote in message
m...

On 4/11/13 8:30 AM, J Herring wrote:
On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 08:19:36 -0400, "Eisboch"
wrote:




The Constitution does not exclude them.

But then again, a convicted felon forfeited some of his rights.
Those
with serious mental health
issues could easily be considered a danger to themselves and/or
society. Alcoholics and drug
addicts? How would that he controlled. I doubt if AA or NA are
going
to provide lists of members.
And besides, members don't 'sign up' or register to be a member.



I don't know what the regs are in a loose state like Virginia,
but in
Maryland if you are buying a firearm, you have to fill out a
questionnaire for the state police on which you state under criminal
penalties whether you are of legal age, whether you are engaging
in a
straw purchase, whether you've been convicted of a crime of
violence,
whether you've been convicted of a misdemeanor act of domestic
violence,
whether you are the respondent in a protective order, whether you've
been committed to a mental institution, whether you are a habitual
drunkard, et cetera. Say yes to any of 'em and your app is denied
and
you might get arrested.

Anyone here a heavy drinker?

---------------------------------------------------------

Same here in MA. As I mentioned to John in another post
habitual use
of drugs and/or alcohol can be cause for denial of a permit, but
also
every time you buy a firearm from a dealer, a form similar to the
one
you described .... probably the same one .... must be filled
out. It
specifically asks about drug and alcohol abuse.





I have a difficult time understanding why so many on the right so
violently oppose just about anything that relates to throttling
down gun
violence. I don't accept the fact that "Americans are just plain
violent
and gun laws will never do anything to stop it."


Actually, the reasons are the same as the ones used by those on the
left
who oppose just about
....etc. If you call something a fact, what is there to not accept
about
it? It is a fact that there
are some crazy-assed folks out there who will kill people - with
guns or
not with guns. A majority
of those on the right, including a majority of NRA members, agree with
the background checks. Many
of the other laws, such as the majority of the rules passed by
Maryland,
are simply stupid. They'd
have done nothing to prevent the last child massacre.

However, a janitor with a concealed carry permit could have
prevented it.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

Mythical. The secret service and armed police could not prevent the
near-assassination of Reagan. What would you expect from a janitor
whose
other job was to safeguard a large school full of kids.

No one mentioned anything about the janitor having 'another job', only a
permit to carry a concealed
weapon. And, not necessarily a janitor. An armed guidance counselor
could
have done as well.

Shoot the gunner before he shot up twenty kids. Using your analogy, why
have *any* security at the
schools or any type of gun control if in one instance it can be
overcome?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

You make a lot of assumptions but ignore the issues.


The average number of people killed in mass shootings when stopped by
police is 14.29

The average number of people killed in a mass shooting when stopped by a
civilian is 2.33

From the article he
http://dailyanarchist.com/2012/07/31...ge-statistics/


Have a happy day harry, please keep playing with your guns...


Daily Anarchist? Oh, well...in that case.

Gun control deal done
 

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 12:08:42 -0700 (PDT), True North wrote:

The Latino neighbours you were degrading right here in this newsgroup.
Remember the families with one too many cars for your liking?

Latino is not a race. ( Hee, hee!)

The fact that some Mexicans down the street made a shambles of their yard has nothing to do with
racism. It's a simple fact.

Look at your yard and you'll see what I mean. Does that mean I'm racist against Canadians?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.

Gun control deal done
 

On Thu, 11 Apr 2013 15:10:12 -0400, "F.O.A.D." wrote:

On 4/11/13 3:08 PM, True North wrote:
The Latino neighbours you were degrading right here in this newsgroup.
Remember the families with one too many cars for your liking?


They probably moved...Herring probably picketed their house.

They're still there. The county got 'em. Most of the junk is back in the house, the oil drums are no
longer in the driveway, the lawn is mowed regularly, and they even repainted the house. Place looks
pretty good now.


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling' - the liberals' last stand.