Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 12:43:54 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:13:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Feb 12, 7:06*am, ESAD wrote:
On 2/12/13 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:









On Feb 12, 6:46 am, ESAD wrote:
It seems perfectly appropriate to be really upset at the number of
gun-caused murders in this country. If you are not really upset, then
there is something wrong with you.

It's very upsetting, Harry. but not to the point of drama. People live
and people die.I''m aware of what *the murder rate is especially in my
state. *But John had a valid question, What would JPS suggest doing
about it. Instead of a *a comprehensive answer he gets cussed,
insulted and demeaned.

So...

"People live and people die." Wow.

Can you deny it?

Herring is a racist, and deserves all the cussing, insults and demeaning
comments he gets.

Over asking for a comprehensive answer to someones continual rant?

1. We can certainly do a lot more to try to cut down on the number of
fellow beings who are cut down by guns. By doing so, we are, in a way,
denying that sort of death.

No doubt.

2. Herring has no interest in "comprehensive answers" to gun deaths or
any of the other serious social ills that plague our society. It's
obvious from his never-ending, simple-minded and hate-filled posts and
comments.


I've asked JPS the same question and have never received any kind of a
a response worth having. More name-calling, more spewing, and more
brain-rattling dementia.

Do you have a solution, Harry? No. No you don't. You have some ideas
on how to help curb the gun murdder rate, the same as I .but that's
not a cure.

You can't even get that much from the OP.

So...

Close the gun show loopholes.

Make sales between private parties a legal process, just like buying a
car, and include a background check.

There is no single solution, there are incremental steps to managing
the otherwise out-of-control free-for-all that is the gun market
today.

Getting drunk driving automobile deaths under control took three
decades but by working all sides of the issue, the rate has declined
by 2/3 over those three decades.

You fruitcakes who think it's just daily business with people getting
shot and killed need to have a family member or close friend die of a
random act of gun mayhem to wake the **** up?

Spectacular ideas!

They should be put in a letter to your congresspeople immediately.


Salmonbait

You've been asked several times what YOUR ideas are... Well?

Another First!
 

On Feb 12, 2:43*pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:13:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:









On Feb 12, 7:06*am, ESAD wrote:
On 2/12/13 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:

On Feb 12, 6:46 am, ESAD wrote:
It seems perfectly appropriate to be really upset at the number of
gun-caused murders in this country. If you are not really upset, then
there is something wrong with you.

It's very upsetting, Harry. but not to the point of drama. People live
and people die.I''m aware of what *the murder rate is especially in my
state. *But John had a valid question, What would JPS suggest doing
about it. Instead of a *a comprehensive answer he gets cussed,
insulted and demeaned.

So...

"People live and people die." Wow.

Can you deny it?

Herring is a racist, and deserves all the cussing, insults and demeaning
comments he gets.

Over asking for a comprehensive answer to someones continual rant?

1. We can certainly do a lot more to try to cut down on the number of
fellow beings who are cut down by guns. By doing so, we are, in a way,
denying that sort of death.

No doubt.

2. Herring has no interest in "comprehensive answers" to gun deaths or
any of the other serious social ills that plague our society. It's
obvious from his never-ending, simple-minded and hate-filled posts and
comments.

I've asked JPS the same question and have never received any kind of a
a response worth having. More name-calling, more spewing, and more
brain-rattling dementia.

Do you have a solution, Harry? *No. No you don't. You have some ideas
on how to help curb the gun murdder rate, the same as I .but that's
not a cure.

You can't even get that much from the OP.

So...

Close the gun show loopholes.

Make sales between private parties a legal process, just like buying a
car, and include a background check.

There is no single solution, there are incremental steps to managing
the otherwise out-of-control free-for-all that is the gun market
today.

Getting drunk driving automobile deaths under control took three
decades but by working all sides of the issue, the rate has declined
by 2/3 over those three decades.



Interesting. That's almost a repeat of the same thing that Harry
said. You got something more original?

Another First!
 

On 2/12/13 6:25 PM, Tim wrote:
On Feb 12, 2:43 pm, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:13:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:









On Feb 12, 7:06 am, ESAD wrote:
On 2/12/13 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:

On Feb 12, 6:46 am, ESAD wrote:
It seems perfectly appropriate to be really upset at the number of
gun-caused murders in this country. If you are not really upset, then
there is something wrong with you.

It's very upsetting, Harry. but not to the point of drama. People live
and people die.I''m aware of what the murder rate is especially in my
state. But John had a valid question, What would JPS suggest doing
about it. Instead of a a comprehensive answer he gets cussed,
insulted and demeaned.

So...

"People live and people die." Wow.

Can you deny it?

Herring is a racist, and deserves all the cussing, insults and demeaning
comments he gets.

Over asking for a comprehensive answer to someones continual rant?

1. We can certainly do a lot more to try to cut down on the number of
fellow beings who are cut down by guns. By doing so, we are, in a way,
denying that sort of death.

No doubt.

2. Herring has no interest in "comprehensive answers" to gun deaths or
any of the other serious social ills that plague our society. It's
obvious from his never-ending, simple-minded and hate-filled posts and
comments.

I've asked JPS the same question and have never received any kind of a
a response worth having. More name-calling, more spewing, and more
brain-rattling dementia.

Do you have a solution, Harry? No. No you don't. You have some ideas
on how to help curb the gun murdder rate, the same as I .but that's
not a cure.

You can't even get that much from the OP.

So...

Close the gun show loopholes.

Make sales between private parties a legal process, just like buying a
car, and include a background check.

There is no single solution, there are incremental steps to managing
the otherwise out-of-control free-for-all that is the gun market
today.

Getting drunk driving automobile deaths under control took three
decades but by working all sides of the issue, the rate has declined
by 2/3 over those three decades.



Interesting. That's almost a repeat of the same thing that Harry
said. You got something more original?



Lots of smart people are suggesting starting points that include:

1. Closing gun show loopholes.

2. No private sales without paperwork and a background check.

3. Ban on manufacture and ownership of mags holding more than 10 rounds.

4. Much more stringent background checks.

5. Mandatory and serious safety and handling training to obtain license
for gun purchase.

6. No possession of firearms without a license.

7. National regulations for buying, selling firearms that supersede
state regulations.

8. More mental health resources



It's not rocket science.

Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 05:13:50 -0800 (PST), Tim
wrote:

On Feb 12, 7:06*am, ESAD wrote:
On 2/12/13 7:59 AM, Tim wrote:









On Feb 12, 6:46 am, ESAD wrote:
It seems perfectly appropriate to be really upset at the number of
gun-caused murders in this country. If you are not really upset, then
there is something wrong with you.

It's very upsetting, Harry. but not to the point of drama. People live
and people die.I''m aware of what *the murder rate is especially in my
state. *But John had a valid question, What would JPS suggest doing
about it. Instead of a *a comprehensive answer he gets cussed,
insulted and demeaned.

So...

"People live and people die." Wow.

Can you deny it?

Herring is a racist, and deserves all the cussing, insults and demeaning
comments he gets.

Over asking for a comprehensive answer to someones continual rant?

1. We can certainly do a lot more to try to cut down on the number of
fellow beings who are cut down by guns. By doing so, we are, in a way,
denying that sort of death.

No doubt.

2. Herring has no interest in "comprehensive answers" to gun deaths or
any of the other serious social ills that plague our society. It's
obvious from his never-ending, simple-minded and hate-filled posts and
comments.


I've asked JPS the same question and have never received any kind of a
a response worth having. More name-calling, more spewing, and more
brain-rattling dementia.

Do you have a solution, Harry? No. No you don't. You have some ideas
on how to help curb the gun murdder rate, the same as I .but that's
not a cure.

You can't even get that much from the OP.

So...

Close the gun show loopholes.

Make sales between private parties a legal process, just like buying a
car, and include a background check.

There is no single solution, there are incremental steps to managing
the otherwise out-of-control free-for-all that is the gun market
today.

Getting drunk driving automobile deaths under control took three
decades but by working all sides of the issue, the rate has declined
by 2/3 over those three decades.

You fruitcakes who think it's just daily business with people getting
shot and killed need to have a family member or close friend die of a
random act of gun mayhem to wake the **** up?

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

Another First!
 

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Another First!
 

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

Another First!
 

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:28:59 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

Oh?


Salmonbait

--
'Name-calling'...the liberals' answer to a lost argument!

You know you live in a Country run by idiots if... You have to have your
parents signature to go on a school field trip but not to get an abortion.

Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 00:28:59 -0800, jps wrote:

On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

Oh?


Salmonbait


And you give a perfect example of what real wisdom isn't, thanks.

Another First!
 

On 2/13/2013 3:28 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

An asshole misquotes BF and you fall in line with the nonsense. Figures.

Another First!
 

On 2/13/2013 6:30 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 2/13/2013 3:28 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

An asshole misquotes BF and you fall in line with the nonsense. Figures.

http://tinyurl.com/ykv9lbs