Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

"ESAD" wrote in message
m...

On 2/11/13 1:01 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:31:45 -0800, jps wrote:


Wow! First shooting of the week. Guess the armed guards at the
entrance and the scanners didn't work.

What now, NRA? More guns and scanners?

How about a law that says 'no shootings unless authorized by TSA'?

What would be your solution, jps? Amend the Constitution, search out and
seize all individually
owned firearms?

Or pretend that pointing out shootings on rec.boats is an important thing
to do. Perhaps you should
add Canadian and Mexican shootings to your postings.


Salmonbait

What is your solution?


His solution is, of course, more guns.


--------------

Does not take guns to murder. Our friends daughter was kidnapped, tortured
and murdered 10 years ago. The make and female were captured and have been
on death row for years. No gun used by the perps. A gun carried by Vanessa
might have saved her life. The point is that there are lowlifes out there
who do not care if guns are outlawed, they will still find a way to harm and
kill. England has lots of not gun murders. And guns are not that hard to
obtain for the criminal element according to Scotland Yard studies. Our
murder rate would actually be pretty low if we discounted Thug on Thug
killings. The drug wars are a war, and mostly between competing drug
suppliers. Legalize most drugs, and the murder rate would drop
precipitously. As to the school shooters, etc. We have not real
psychological health system and most of that is not very good. Other than
administering more drugs, there does not seem to be cures. Also the Thug
and Thug culture, is a massive breakdown of family and societal mores.

I know of no one who has said that it takes a gun to murder. BUT, the
facts are that more murders in the U.S. by far are committed with guns.
Also, most gun crimes are with guns that are either stolen, borrowed or
otherwise taken from lawful owners.

Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/13/2013 2:05 PM, Califbill wrote:
"ESAD" wrote in message
m...

On 2/11/13 1:01 PM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Mon, 11 Feb 2013 08:31:45 -0800, jps wrote:


Wow! First shooting of the week. Guess the armed guards at the
entrance and the scanners didn't work.

What now, NRA? More guns and scanners?

How about a law that says 'no shootings unless authorized by TSA'?

What would be your solution, jps? Amend the Constitution, search out
and seize all individually
owned firearms?

Or pretend that pointing out shootings on rec.boats is an important
thing to do. Perhaps you should
add Canadian and Mexican shootings to your postings.


Salmonbait

What is your solution?


His solution is, of course, more guns.


--------------

Does not take guns to murder. Our friends daughter was kidnapped,
tortured and murdered 10 years ago. The make and female were captured
and have been on death row for years. No gun used by the perps. A gun
carried by Vanessa might have saved her life. The point is that there
are lowlifes out there who do not care if guns are outlawed, they will
still find a way to harm and kill. England has lots of not gun
murders. And guns are not that hard to obtain for the criminal element
according to Scotland Yard studies. Our murder rate would actually be
pretty low if we discounted Thug on Thug killings. The drug wars are a
war, and mostly between competing drug suppliers. Legalize most drugs,
and the murder rate would drop precipitously. As to the school
shooters, etc. We have not real psychological health system and most of
that is not very good. Other than administering more drugs, there does
not seem to be cures. Also the Thug and Thug culture, is a massive
breakdown of family and societal mores.


Yeah, and you got guys dressing up like the joker and guys writing
twenty page manifestos on Facebook and the administration doesn't see
the connection between the entertainment media and murder... cause
entertainment media (ie zukerberg et al) gave them so much vacation money...

WTF is this insane babbling bull****?

Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/13/2013 9:15 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 20:36:41 -0500, JustWaitAFrekinMinute
wrote:

On 2/13/2013 6:43 PM, Meyer wrote:
On 2/13/2013 5:19 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"Meyer" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 2/13/2013 11:29 AM, thumper wrote:
On 2/13/2013 6:30 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 2/13/2013 3:28 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

An asshole misquotes BF and you fall in line with the nonsense.
Figures.

http://tinyurl.com/ykv9lbs

It seems that I was wrong about the quote.

----------------------------------

Before some get carried away with hero worship regarding Ben Franklin
quotes, here's another one of his to consider:


?I am for doing good to the poor, but...I think the best way of doing
good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or
driving them out of it. I observed...that the more public provisions
were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of
course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them,
the more they did for themselves, and became richer.?

? Benjamin Franklin

That won't resonate well with our liberal and progressive friends.

As long as Dick didn't leave a spelling error in there, all they can do
is call names:)

Who left the dick in you?


Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America... Rosedale Lane,
Huntington Maryland.. Why?

Wow, she put a dick in you? Did it hurt?

Another First!
 

In article , lid says...

On 2/13/2013 6:26 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/13/2013 9:15 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:

Who left the dick in you?

Dr. Karen Grear of Catholic University of America... Rosedale Lane,
Huntington Maryland.. Why?

This is why many prefer anonymity. Where do you get your morals?.

Oh, he's proven himself a low life scum here over and over. Wait until
he starts calling people "****s" and letting his daughter watch while he
types about sucking dick as he did before.

Another First!
 

In article ,
says...

On 2/14/13 1:20 AM, thumper wrote:
On 2/13/2013 6:26 PM, JustWaitAFrekinMinute wrote:
On 2/13/2013 9:15 PM, Urin Asshole wrote:

Who left the dick in you?



This is why many prefer anonymity. Where do you get your morals?.


Scotty combines the very best in mental, intellectual, and emotional
deficiencies with ignorance and rightwingnutdom, a combination that
gives him the winsome psychotic personality he presents here every day.
Be careful, because he's surely going to start accusing you of hiding
from him to avoid a personal, physical confrontation.

Hey, let him be, he's having a hard day, he has to look under the
cushions to get some change to buy his wife some Zig Zags and Bugler
tobacco for Valentines day....

Another First!
 

On Thursday, 14 February 2013 11:30:08 UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...
snip..

Wow, she put a dick in you? Did it hurt?


Oh oh..this is going to make e#c insanely jealous. He thought he was Snottie's one & only.

Another First!
 

On 2/14/13 10:36 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 14 February 2013 11:30:08 UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...
snip..

Wow, she put a dick in you? Did it hurt?


Oh oh..this is going to make e#c insanely jealous. He thought he was Snottie's one & only.


I dispute that! :) Snotty has a heart condition and cancer. His days
of spewing seed are long gone.

Another First!
 

In article , says...

On 2/14/13 10:36 AM, True North wrote:
On Thursday, 14 February 2013 11:30:08 UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...
snip..

Wow, she put a dick in you? Did it hurt?


Oh oh..this is going to make e#c insanely jealous. He thought he was Snottie's one & only.


I dispute that! :) Snotty has a heart condition and cancer. His days
of spewing seed are long gone.

Blackmail!

Another First!
 

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 17:19:04 -0500, "Eisboch" wrote:



"Meyer" wrote in message
web.com...

On 2/13/2013 11:29 AM, thumper wrote:
On 2/13/2013 6:30 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 2/13/2013 3:28 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper
wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

An asshole misquotes BF and you fall in line with the nonsense.
Figures.

http://tinyurl.com/ykv9lbs

It seems that I was wrong about the quote.

----------------------------------

Before some get carried away with hero worship regarding Ben Franklin
quotes, here's another one of his to consider:


“I am for doing good to the poor, but...I think the best way of doing
good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or
driving them out of it. I observed...that the more public provisions
were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of
course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for
them, the more they did for themselves, and became richer.”

? Benjamin Franklin

You can't drive people out of poverty if there's nothing to grab hold
of. We need jobs and an economy that relies on goods produced in the
USA, not China. Those in poverty need more education and opportunity
to climb the ladder. Wrungs are missing or too expensive in the US.
Foriegn students with better prep systems are taking those seats.

College is either fully or partially subsedized in a lot of countries.
Our higher ed system isn't supported as well by government (taxes) so
if you ain't got the coin or access to credit, you're **** out of luck
here in the states.

Another First!
 

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 16:27:14 -0800, Urin Asshole
wrote:

On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 18:43:34 -0500, Meyer wrote:

On 2/13/2013 5:19 PM, Eisboch wrote:


"Meyer" wrote in message
eb.com...

On 2/13/2013 11:29 AM, thumper wrote:
On 2/13/2013 6:30 AM, Meyer wrote:
On 2/13/2013 3:28 AM, jps wrote:
On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 22:31:11 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 2/12/2013 4:53 PM, BAR wrote:

When you trade security for liberty you soon have neither.

You have that backwards.

"Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little
Temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety"

Benjamin Franklin

Real wisdom doesn't fit so easily on a bumper sticker.

An asshole misquotes BF and you fall in line with the nonsense. Figures.

http://tinyurl.com/ykv9lbs

It seems that I was wrong about the quote.

----------------------------------

Before some get carried away with hero worship regarding Ben Franklin
quotes, here's another one of his to consider:


“I am for doing good to the poor, but...I think the best way of doing
good to the poor, is not making them easy in poverty, but leading or
driving them out of it. I observed...that the more public provisions
were made for the poor, the less they provided for themselves, and of
course became poorer. And, on the contrary, the less was done for them,
the more they did for themselves, and became richer.”

? Benjamin Franklin

That won't resonate well with our liberal and progressive friends.

You misquoted him, and you don't know much about Franklin, clearly...

Franklin was hardly insensitive to the travails of the
overty-stricken: "But poverty often deprives a man of all spirit and
virtue: 'tis hard for an empty bag to stand upright." Additionally, he
seemed fairly unimpressed with the trappings of wealth: "The Poor have
little, Beggars none; the Rich too much, enough not one." And heck,
you give Franklin enough quote, and he can sound like a welfare-queen:
"The church the state, and the poor, are 3 daughters which we should
maintain, but not portion off."

Thanks for those. He was indeed a fair-minded man who had his
priorities straight.