If you thought...
 

In article , says...

On 1/14/2013 8:57 AM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:08:32 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.

All decisions are the result of binary thinking. Why do you denigrate it?

Also, in my experience, ten-year olds tend to exaggerate tremendously. Perhaps she misconstrued a
prayer before dinner as 'brainwashing'.

So you have experienced Baptists making threats in their attempts at coercion? Perhaps you could
amplify? Sounds like a good story.

Salmonbait


They are searching in every direction they can to try to defend the
narrative, but they really can't unless they call on the media, or like
loogie, just make it up..

You stupid ****, everybody here has given examples of it happening, you
are either in denial or too stupid to comprehend or read.

If you thought...
 

On 1/14/13 9:20 AM, iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,
says...

On Sat, 12 Jan 2013 11:08:32 -0800, thumper wrote:

On 1/12/2013 7:02 AM, Salmonbait wrote:

I should have said, "What did your sister expect when she allowed her daughter to go on a weekend
trip with a Baptist church group - no religion?"

There's that binary thinking again. There's a difference between
presenting information in a comfortable environment and more intense
coercion involving threats. Baptists tend toward the latter from my
limited experience.

All decisions are the result of binary thinking. Why do you denigrate it?

Also, in my experience, ten-year olds tend to exaggerate tremendously. Perhaps she misconstrued a
prayer before dinner as 'brainwashing'.

No, she didn't. She clearly understood that they were trying to get her
to be born again, and when she stated that she needed to talk to her
mother and father first, they told her she should do it NOW.

So you have experienced Baptists making threats in their attempts at coercion? Perhaps you could
amplify? Sounds like a good story.

Yes, I have. Again, "if you aren't born again, you'll burn in hell."
.



Better to burn in hell than be in the company of all those born-again
baptists.

If you thought...
 

On 1/14/13 12:38 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


- - -

The American Indians were doing fine until whitey and whitey's religion
showed up and destroyed their culture, religion, and civilization, and
gave them diseases and stole their land.

If you thought...
 

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:33 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 12:38 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


- - -

The American Indians were doing fine until whitey and whitey's religion
showed up and destroyed their culture, religion, and civilization, and
gave them diseases and stole their land.

....and then the government started taking care of them...

Salmonbait

--

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**

If you thought...
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:33 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 12:38 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


- - -

The American Indians were doing fine until whitey and whitey's religion
showed up and destroyed their culture, religion, and civilization, and
gave them diseases and stole their land.

...and then the government started taking care of them...

Salmonbait

No they didn't and that's the problem.

If you thought...
 

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:28:21 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:33 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 12:38 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


- - -

The American Indians were doing fine until whitey and whitey's religion
showed up and destroyed their culture, religion, and civilization, and
gave them diseases and stole their land.

...and then the government started taking care of them...

Salmonbait

No they didn't and that's the problem.

Thank you. That's my point.

Salmonbait

--

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**

If you thought...
 

On 1/14/13 1:55 PM, Salmonbait wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:28:21 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:33 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 12:38 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


- - -

The American Indians were doing fine until whitey and whitey's religion
showed up and destroyed their culture, religion, and civilization, and
gave them diseases and stole their land.

...and then the government started taking care of them...

Salmonbait

No they didn't and that's the problem.

Thank you. That's my point.

Salmonbait


It's really too bad those white christian assholes destroyed native
american culture, eh?

If you thought...
 

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 13:28:21 -0500, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Mon, 14 Jan 2013 12:36:33 -0500, ESAD wrote:

On 1/14/13 12:38 PM, Salmonbait wrote:

**Those who think they can be happy and prosperous by letting the Government
take care of them better take a closer look at the American Indian.**


- - -

The American Indians were doing fine until whitey and whitey's religion
showed up and destroyed their culture, religion, and civilization, and
gave them diseases and stole their land.

...and then the government started taking care of them...

Salmonbait

No they didn't and that's the problem.

Thank you. That's my point.

Salmonbait

WHOOOOOOOOSH.... damn you are stupid.

If you thought...
 

On 13/01/2013 2:16 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 4:48 AM, JustWait wrote:

Pedophiles and their enablers don't really like church groups...

Except the ones they run.

Good point.

http://rt.com/news/pedophile-canada-deacon-charged-700/

Typical church BS, do as I ask not as I do hypocrisy. Fact is the
church is a haven for pedophiles.

Even Brazil, a catholic strong hold is failing as people leave the
church, so bad it gets the Popes personal attention.

The reality much of the way the Vatican operates is profit from sin.
--
Liberal-socialism is a great idea so long as the credit is good and
other people pay for it. When the credit runs out and those that pay
for it leave, they can all share having nothing but debt and discontentment.

If you thought...
 

On 1/14/13 3:41 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 13/01/2013 2:16 PM, thumper wrote:
On 1/12/2013 4:48 AM, JustWait wrote:

Pedophiles and their enablers don't really like church groups...

Except the ones they run.

Good point.

http://rt.com/news/pedophile-canada-deacon-charged-700/

Typical church BS, do as I ask not as I do hypocrisy. Fact is the
church is a haven for pedophiles.

Even Brazil, a catholic strong hold is failing as people leave the
church, so bad it gets the Popes personal attention.

The reality much of the way the Vatican operates is profit from sin.


There's no question the Catholic church and perhaps other churches have
a serious problem with pedophilia. Perhaps the numbers of pedophiles in
the Catholic church might be drastically reduced in the future if the
church did away with its requirement that its clergy remain single and
abstain from normal adult sexual contact. Which is not to say there is
no pedophilia among married people, but the goal is to reduce it in the
churches, eh? Jesus, after all, certainly didn't require single clergy
or abstention. He probably was married, since it would have been odd for
a Jewish male of his age to be single.