Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default What the 'ell??

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 707354998378760787.458258bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

In article ,
says...

On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:
wrote:

On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...



http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html







What is YOUR solution?



Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles.



The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted

the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and

seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is

that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system

that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law.

All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms.

Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs.

Do you really, I mean really fall for that ignorant rhetoric?? Every
time I hear a far right wing NRA whack job spew that **** I always
think, I wonder if that individual is really that stupid....


Read the paper or listen to the reporters. Is always an SUV killing or
causing the accident. Not the fact the driver was an idiot, or drunk, or
even the fact the other car caused the accident. If an SUV was involved,
is always identified.


Okay, let me try to put in so that even you can understand it. What is
the purpose and intent in owning an SUV? Is it to kill something or
someone? Now ask the same question about someone owning a gun. Do people
own guns to get from point A to point B? Do people own assault weapons
to carry groceries or take the kids to baseball practice? Now doesn't
that above bull**** sound silly?


Apples and oranges.
  #2   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Sep 2011
Posts: 7,588
Default What the 'ell??

In article 1149199699378769382.852405bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 707354998378760787.458258bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

In article ,
says...

On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:
wrote:

On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...



http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html







What is YOUR solution?



Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and legitimate hunting rifles.



The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted

the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and

seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is

that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system

that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law.

All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms.

Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs.

Do you really, I mean really fall for that ignorant rhetoric?? Every
time I hear a far right wing NRA whack job spew that **** I always
think, I wonder if that individual is really that stupid....

Read the paper or listen to the reporters. Is always an SUV killing or
causing the accident. Not the fact the driver was an idiot, or drunk, or
even the fact the other car caused the accident. If an SUV was involved,
is always identified.


Okay, let me try to put in so that even you can understand it. What is
the purpose and intent in owning an SUV? Is it to kill something or
someone? Now ask the same question about someone owning a gun. Do people
own guns to get from point A to point B? Do people own assault weapons
to carry groceries or take the kids to baseball practice? Now doesn't
that above bull**** sound silly?


Apples and oranges.


EXACTLY!!! Now you are getting why it is such a stupid argument.
  #3   Report Post  
posted to rec.boats
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by BoatBanter: Oct 2012
Posts: 3,510
Default What the 'ell??

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 1149199699378769382.852405bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article 707354998378760787.458258bmckeenospam-
, says...

iBoaterer wrote:
In article ,

says...

In article ,
says...

On Monday, December 31, 2012 4:22:26 PM UTC-4, Califbill wrote:
wrote:

On Monday, December 31, 2012 8:58:58 AM UTC-4, iBoaterer wrote:

In article ,



says...







Looks like things are getting crazier by the minute down there...



http://www.cbc.ca/news/yourcommunity...-shooting.html







What is YOUR solution?



Disarm the population...with an exception for shotguns and
legitimate hunting rifles.



The founders did not include gun rights because of hunting. They wanted

the leaders to have a fear of the populace. The problem we have, and

seeing a few mass murders in Canada also, the problem includes canada, is

that we have both a general breakdown in society and a mental health system

that is mostly nonexistent and overly constrained by law.

All the more reason to limit ownership of firearms.

Cars kill people, we need to limit cars, especially those evil SUVs.

Do you really, I mean really fall for that ignorant rhetoric?? Every
time I hear a far right wing NRA whack job spew that **** I always
think, I wonder if that individual is really that stupid....

Read the paper or listen to the reporters. Is always an SUV killing or
causing the accident. Not the fact the driver was an idiot, or drunk, or
even the fact the other car caused the accident. If an SUV was involved,
is always identified.

Okay, let me try to put in so that even you can understand it. What is
the purpose and intent in owning an SUV? Is it to kill something or
someone? Now ask the same question about someone owning a gun. Do people
own guns to get from point A to point B? Do people own assault weapons
to carry groceries or take the kids to baseball practice? Now doesn't
that above bull**** sound silly?


Apples and oranges.


EXACTLY!!! Now you are getting why it is such a stupid argument.


No, I see why it is stupid to argue with an idiot like you.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What the 'ell! Don White General 33 May 5th 09 02:13 PM
What the 'ell is goin' on in Connecticut? Don White General 11 December 20th 07 12:13 PM
W'ell all need thicker foul weather jackets Ellen MacArthur ASA 18 September 25th 06 09:34 PM
W'ell all need thicker foul weather jackets John W. Bienko ASA 1 September 24th 06 03:56 PM
O/T - US going to *ell in a handbasket! Don White General 5 September 11th 04 10:20 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 BoatBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Boats"

 

Copyright © 2017