On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:50:39 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:


you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

uh...how many jobs were created by the tax cut for the rich?

oh. MINUS 10 million

to the right wing a NEGATIVE number is positive if it affects the
middle class


BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"


you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

and you might want to read what a CONSERVATIVE NOBEL PRIZE WINNER
says:

http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/index.html

The rich bankers and others who took large risks should have taken
much larger haircuts. I have also supported from the beginning of the
recession higher capital requirements for banks, especially for the
large “too big to fail banks” that will be bailed out if they get into
financial difficulties.


gary becker is a nobel prize winning CONSERVATIVE economist

he's concerned about inequality

he's concerned that the financial sector has consumed HUGE resources
with little return

he's concerned that there are too few regulations on large banks

he's CONSERVATIVE

i'm a LIBERAL and i have the same concerns

you right wing socialists dont care.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:00:27 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:

On 11/26/11 8:46 AM, bpuharic wrote:
On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:35:36 -0500, wrote:

so we gave you corporate socialists everything you wanted

high corporate profits
no unions
unregulated financial markets

and how'd that work out for america??



In case you were not aware, "iboaterer" is a 14-year-old boy using his
mommy's computer. He's not worth any responses.

right wingers are absolutely clueless. it's ironice that CONSERVATIVE
economists like gary becker are worried about these issues as
well..the right wing just wants the middle class to sweep them under
the rug

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:49:05 -0500, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

Daddy government of course.


corporations ARE the govt

we are taxed to bail them out. but the right wing is fine with
that....

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:38:39 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:06:49 -0500, X ` Man
wrote:


I agree there are a lot of corporations who are exporting jobs and
importing goods from slave wage countries but that gets back to NAFTA
and GATT.
Just like the real estate bubble, these corporations are doing exactly
what the government told them to do.

typical right wing nonsense. the govt does what corporations tell them
to

dont like environmental restrictions? get rid of the EPA

want to have a free hand with labor? destroy unions

the real estate bubble? create worthless financial instruments then
blame it on the middle class and mythological regulations

the right are such sheep

In article ,
says...

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 07:01:36 -0600, Boating All Out
wrote:

So you don't invest either? I hope you folks like cat food.

No, and I have no money worries.

Where does your money come from?

A savings account is an investment.

A mattress is not an investment.

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:47:30 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:49:44 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

Bob is making a good buck. He's in the top 5%.

nope. 25%. upper middle class

$80,000? (that is the 75th percentile) and you are bitching about your
taxes? What did you pay? $6000-6500? (8%)

nope. paid about 12. and i make more than that but certainly NOT in
the top 5%

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:50:45 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

How can you be a capitalist if you want to destroy the engine of
capitalism, the capital market.

nice thing about right wingers is they dont read. so it's easy to show
they're wrong

i never said i want DESTROY the markets. i said i want to REGULATE
them to ensure they dont use moral hazard to escape the penalties of
their greed.

the right wants to insulate the market from failures but wants to
ensure they make as much money as possible, even when they fail

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:50:39 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:43:30 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 08:21:59 -0500, John H
wrote:


you could have said corporations would create jobs when they make
record profits AND get low taxes

oh...wait...we DID give corporations EXACTLY that

uh...how's the job situation??


Now go back and try to ATFQ! (The 'Q' stands for 'Question'.)

Uh, how many people have jobs? Some entity must be providing them. Are all the workers in this
country *really* working for the government?

uh...how many jobs were created by the tax cut for the rich?

oh. MINUS 10 million

to the right wing a NEGATIVE number is positive if it affects the
middle class


BTW, you still didn't answer Greg's question. Is it too difficult for you?

"If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"


you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

and you might want to read what a CONSERVATIVE NOBEL PRIZE WINNER
says:

http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/index.html

The rich bankers and others who took large risks should have taken
much larger haircuts. I have also supported from the beginning of the
recession higher capital requirements for banks, especially for the
large “too big to fail banks” that will be bailed out if they get into
financial difficulties.


gary becker is a nobel prize winning CONSERVATIVE economist

he's concerned about inequality

he's concerned that the financial sector has consumed HUGE resources
with little return

he's concerned that there are too few regulations on large banks

he's CONSERVATIVE

i'm a LIBERAL and i have the same concerns

you right wing socialists dont care.

You spread a lot of bull****, but you've still got two questions you're unable to answer.

1. Uh, how many people have jobs?

2."If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 13:38:25 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:18:00 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 10:50:45 -0500, wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

you socialists destroy corporations

we capitalists create them

How can you be a capitalist if you want to destroy the engine of
capitalism, the capital market.

nice thing about right wingers is they dont read. so it's easy to show
they're wrong

i never said i want DESTROY the markets. i said i want to REGULATE
them to ensure they dont use moral hazard to escape the penalties of
their greed.

the right wants to insulate the market from failures but wants to
ensure they make as much money as possible, even when they fail

Do I need to go get your quotes about destroying Wall Street?

great. go get 'em. i'll wait

you plutocrats want to destroy capitalism because you think being rich
is, in and of itself, proof of market efficency

BBBZZZZ!! WRONG!

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 12:23:18 -0500, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 26 Nov 2011 09:50:24 -0500, bpuharic wrote:

and you might want to read what a CONSERVATIVE NOBEL PRIZE WINNER
says:

http://www.becker-posner-blog.com/index.html

The rich bankers and others who took large risks should have taken
much larger haircuts. I have also supported from the beginning of the
recession higher capital requirements for banks, especially for the
large “too big to fail banks” that will be bailed out if they get into
financial difficulties.


gary becker is a nobel prize winning CONSERVATIVE economist

he's concerned about inequality

he's concerned that the financial sector has consumed HUGE resources
with little return

he's concerned that there are too few regulations on large banks

he's CONSERVATIVE

i'm a LIBERAL and i have the same concerns

you right wing socialists dont care.

You spread a lot of bull****, but you've still got two questions you're unable to answer.

1. Uh, how many people have jobs?


not enough AND we dont have enough TAX revenue because we keep cutting
taxes on the RICH


2."If you destroy all of the corporations, where will those jobs come from?"

what jobs? you keep telling me we have so many jobs because of the tax
cuts on the rich

where are they?

WHERE ARE THE JOBS

talk about dodging a question!