On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:37:30 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:39:48 -0400, John H
wrote:

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:08:28 -0400, Wayne B wrote:

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:57:46 -0400, BAR wrote:

So answer his question. Just when does a fertilized egg become a human?

At conception.

===

That's a religious view not supportable by any logic or science. It
even fails the common sense test. You are entitled to your beliefs
as long as you don't try to legislate them for everyone else.

Wayne, are you feeling legislated against?

=======

Not at all but I'm concerned by the single issue zealousness
surrounding all of this. The country faces more important challenges
and if the Republican party can not find a more centrist position on
women's rights, they run the risk of reelecting the current
administration. Think about that.

Wayne, I feel that a fetus which can survive outside the womb is, in fact, a baby. They should,
therefore, have the right to life of any other baby, and killing them should be considered, as it is
in some cases, murder. The idea that late term abortions should be legal because of rape, incest,
'accident', or whatever is, in my opinion, bull****. Those are times for the 'morning after' pill.

That has nothing to do with my religion. The Catholic Church opposes *any* abortion, *any time*,
unless it's changed one hell of a lot in the past few years. The Catholic Church also opposes birth
control except that which can occur naturally through use of the 'rythm' method. I disagree with the
Catholic Church of these issues.

So, you can lay all you want on 'religion', but religion has little to do with my opinion.

On 9/25/11 1:15 PM, John H wrote:
On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 00:37:30 -0400, Wayne wrote:

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:39:48 -0400, John
wrote:

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 18:08:28 -0400, Wayne wrote:

On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 09:57:46 -0400, wrote:

So answer his question. Just when does a fertilized egg become a human?

At conception.

===

That's a religious view not supportable by any logic or science. It
even fails the common sense test. You are entitled to your beliefs
as long as you don't try to legislate them for everyone else.

Wayne, are you feeling legislated against?

=======

Not at all but I'm concerned by the single issue zealousness
surrounding all of this. The country faces more important challenges
and if the Republican party can not find a more centrist position on
women's rights, they run the risk of reelecting the current
administration. Think about that.

Wayne, I feel that a fetus which can survive outside the womb is, in fact, a baby. They should,
therefore, have the right to life of any other baby, and killing them should be considered, as it is
in some cases, murder. The idea that late term abortions should be legal because of rape, incest,
'accident', or whatever is, in my opinion, bull****. Those are times for the 'morning after' pill.



Hope this gives you a stroke, Herring, but I agree with you about
restricting late term pregnancies, except for the whatever you
mentioned. If it is discovered continuing a late term pregnancy presents
a significant risk to the life of the pregnant woman, she should be able
to terminate that pregnancy. Same with discovery of a seriously damaged
fetus, unless you want to contribute substantially to its lifelong care.

Now, what hospital will you be taken to, to recover from that stroke?