wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:10:06 -0400, L wrote:


wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:12:15 -0600,
wrote:



I see Obama made more progress in destroying the USA.... the last ee
shuttle launched today. Yep, rather bailout GM losers, banks and pad
corrupt buddies but not keep the only peaceful science thing the
government does. Reward incompetence and screw the advancement to space.ou


funny you should say that since he's just choosing the options the
right has left him. it's dawning on them they have destroyed the
country



Hey, people would have gotten raises but check out how instead of seeing
it in the pay check, employment taxes have gone up for the last 30 years
to fuel bigger, fatter, more expensive government. Governemnt gets
bigger, people get smaller.


the govt is the smallest it's been in 60 years. to the right that's
too big since it means they can still examine wall street


Post proof or retract.

you really are ****ing stupid, aren't you? you right wngers have NO
****ing idea about you views, what the facts are, etc. you just have
your cliches and that's it

****ing IDIOT

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/...10-taxes_N.htm

am i EVER wrong? no.

YOU guys are IDIOTS

So, in your small mind, you associate the size of the US government with
the tax revenue it collects? You aren't only blind, you are a moron,
Bobbie!

In article ,
says...

wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:10:06 -0400, L wrote:


wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:12:15 -0600,
wrote:



I see Obama made more progress in destroying the USA.... the last ee
shuttle launched today. Yep, rather bailout GM losers, banks and pad
corrupt buddies but not keep the only peaceful science thing the
government does. Reward incompetence and screw the advancement to space.ou


funny you should say that since he's just choosing the options the
right has left him. it's dawning on them they have destroyed the
country



Hey, people would have gotten raises but check out how instead of seeing
it in the pay check, employment taxes have gone up for the last 30 years
to fuel bigger, fatter, more expensive government. Governemnt gets
bigger, people get smaller.


the govt is the smallest it's been in 60 years. to the right that's
too big since it means they can still examine wall street


Post proof or retract.

you really are ****ing stupid, aren't you? you right wngers have NO
****ing idea about you views, what the facts are, etc. you just have
your cliches and that's it

****ing IDIOT

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/...10-taxes_N.htm

am i EVER wrong? no.

YOU guys are IDIOTS

So, in your small mind, you associate the size of the US government with
the tax revenue it collects? You aren't only blind, you are a moron,
Bobbie!

Hey, but he called you a bunch of names and wrote it like a four year
old...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 7/10/2011 12:22 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articleftWdnUysEOt0j4TTnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:10:06 -0400, L wrote:


wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:12:15 -0600,
wrote:



I see Obama made more progress in destroying the USA.... the last ee
shuttle launched today. Yep, rather bailout GM losers, banks and pad
corrupt buddies but not keep the only peaceful science thing the
government does. Reward incompetence and screw the advancement to space.ou


funny you should say that since he's just choosing the options the
right has left him. it's dawning on them they have destroyed the
country



Hey, people would have gotten raises but check out how instead of seeing
it in the pay check, employment taxes have gone up for the last 30 years
to fuel bigger, fatter, more expensive government. Governemnt gets
bigger, people get smaller.


the govt is the smallest it's been in 60 years. to the right that's
too big since it means they can still examine wall street


Post proof or retract.

you really are ****ing stupid, aren't you? you right wngers have NO
****ing idea about you views, what the facts are, etc. you just have
your cliches and that's it

****ing IDIOT

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/...10-taxes_N.htm

am i EVER wrong? no.

YOU guys are IDIOTS

So, in your small mind, you associate the size of the US government with
the tax revenue it collects? You aren't only blind, you are a moron,
Bobbie!

Hey, but he called you a bunch of names and wrote it like a four year
old...


He should enroll in Harrie's bonehead English class.

I_am_Tosk wrote:
In articleftWdnUysEOt0j4TTnZ2dnUVZ_oqdnZ2d@giganews. com,
says...

wf3h wrote:

On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:10:06 -0400, L wrote:



wf3h wrote:


On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 10:12:15 -0600,
wrote:




I see Obama made more progress in destroying the USA.... the last ee
shuttle launched today. Yep, rather bailout GM losers, banks and pad
corrupt buddies but not keep the only peaceful science thing the
government does. Reward incompetence and screw the advancement to space.ou



funny you should say that since he's just choosing the options the
right has left him. it's dawning on them they have destroyed the
country




Hey, people would have gotten raises but check out how instead of seeing
it in the pay check, employment taxes have gone up for the last 30 years
to fuel bigger, fatter, more expensive government. Governemnt gets
bigger, people get smaller.



the govt is the smallest it's been in 60 years. to the right that's
too big since it means they can still examine wall street



Post proof or retract.


you really are ****ing stupid, aren't you? you right wngers have NO
****ing idea about you views, what the facts are, etc. you just have
your cliches and that's it

****ing IDIOT

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/...10-taxes_N.htm

am i EVER wrong? no.

YOU guys are IDIOTS


So, in your small mind, you associate the size of the US government with
the tax revenue it collects? You aren't only blind, you are a moron,
Bobbie!

Hey, but he called you a bunch of names and wrote it like a four year
old...


It's expected from Bob.

On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:48:18 -0400, L G wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:10:06 -0400, L wrote:




the govt is the smallest it's been in 60 years. to the right that's
too big since it means they can still examine wall street


Post proof or retract.

you really are ****ing stupid, aren't you? you right wngers have NO
****ing idea about you views, what the facts are, etc. you just have
your cliches and that's it

****ing IDIOT

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/...10-taxes_N.htm

am i EVER wrong? no.

YOU guys are IDIOTS

So, in your small mind, you associate the size of the US government with
the tax revenue it collects? You aren't only blind, you are a moron,
Bobbie!

gee. someone's gotta pay for it. how's the GOP doing in tax cutting?
any specifics?

oh. none. the right keeps telling us we're overtaxed

oh. you're lying about that.

moron

"wf3h" wrote in message ...

On Sat, 09 Jul 2011 22:48:18 -0400, L G wrote:

wf3h wrote:
On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 21:10:06 -0400, L wrote:




the govt is the smallest it's been in 60 years. to the right that's
too big since it means they can still examine wall street


Post proof or retract.

you really are ****ing stupid, aren't you? you right wngers have NO
****ing idea about you views, what the facts are, etc. you just have
your cliches and that's it

****ing IDIOT

http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/...10-taxes_N.htm

am i EVER wrong? no.

YOU guys are IDIOTS

So, in your small mind, you associate the size of the US government with
the tax revenue it collects? You aren't only blind, you are a moron,
Bobbie!

gee. someone's gotta pay for it. how's the GOP doing in tax cutting?
any specifics?

oh. none. the right keeps telling us we're overtaxed

oh. you're lying about that.

moron

Reply:
Moron? We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem! The
government requires excess wages in any government contract. Not what the
market can support, and then taxes the rest of the people to enforce the
excess payments. Living Wage! **** that! Pay what the job is worth.
Minimum wage should be for those starting out with little skills. After 10
years in the workforce, there should be no minimum wage required. If you
can not produce more than the MW you would earn, then you are not worth
hiring. I do not care if it was Right or Left who overspent. And both
parties did the overspending. Both parties have caused inflation over the
last 30 years. When Nixon instituted wage and price controls the inflation
rate was an unacceptable 3.3%. Over the last 30 years we have exceeded 4.8%
a year rate. 1980 a mid level engineer, with a college degree made about
$22k-23k a year. Now that is poverty level. We have inflated wages so much
we have priced ourselves out of most manufacturing jobs. UAW built crap
cars and not caring about the quality, drove buyers to foreign cars. Better
quality for the same price. Was also management, but the workers did not
help. Management should have been fired also. They assemble them here with
lower cost workers. Screwed the UAW workers for being overpaid,
underworked, careless workers. Same in a lot of other industries. All that
deficit spending, is hurting the country in a couple of ways. Serious
hurting! Inflating the US dollar to make us less competitive, and sucking
up most of the capitol available to loan. Where is business who needs
capitol to start of expand, going to get that capitol? Every business in
the country is cutting back on employees and spending. Except for the US
Federal Government. They have added 36,000 more employees and increased
wages for most of the government employees. Raise taxes all you want, but
without meaningful spending cuts, we are doomed. We need at least a $1.5
trillion dollar cut in spending, not a pathetic $36 Billion cut. Less than
a percent. We also need to scrap the requirement to pay prevailing wages as
now defined. The definition seems to be whatever the highest union
negotiated wage is, not what is prevailing as paid in the industry. We need
to allow companies to fire union workers who are incompetent a lot easier.
Sure the union can protect workers from unjust termination, but a person
drunk on the job, should be fired. Not have a court rule you have to keep
them on the payroll. Happened to the SF Muni transit district. Drunk bus
driver. They were required to pay him back wages and reinstate him in the
job. A drunk bus driver!
Sure there should be changes to the tax code, but those are not going to
stop the deficit. May reduce in a minimal amount, but not what spending
cuts would do. Kill the alcohol farm subsidy. Tax hedge fund managers at
wage level not capitol gains level. Kill the cotton subsidy, kill a lot of
the water subsidy. Where a farmer can pay $10 an acre foot and resell it to
towns at $1000. Spending cuts are what are needed. There are not enough
tax revenues available to rescue us.

On 7/11/11 3:56 PM, Califbill wrote:

Reply:
Moron? We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem!


GO talking points bull****. Nothing more.

On 11/07/2011 1:58 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/11/11 3:56 PM, Califbill wrote:

Reply:
Moron? We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem!


GO talking points bull****. Nothing more.

Actually you have both.

Revenue is down as investing in the USA right now carries high
inflation, taxation and profitability risk, so much so not many are
making money. And inflation decreases the value. So new job creation
investment has dried up.

You can see this in 2006 tax revenue, today it is 2/3rds of 2006. Than
means your average business and personal income is less than 2/3rd in
real dollars over 2006. Hey, can't tax the 20% of real unemployed and
McJob replacements don't pay much taxes. But it is an Obamanation.

Spending, this too. If government can increase spending in one year by a
trillion, time to roll it back a trillion.

And by borrowing more with tax increases, many businesses are just going
to say f'k-it.

--
Now the real war is on Obama-debt, to save America's future.
And do it for your kids sake....and ignore the selfish fleabags...

On 7/11/11 7:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2011 1:58 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/11/11 3:56 PM, Califbill wrote:

Reply:
Moron? We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem!


GO talking points bull****. Nothing more.

Actually you have both.

Revenue is down as investing in the USA right now carries high
inflation, taxation and profitability risk, so much so not many are
making money. And inflation decreases the value. So new job creation
investment has dried up.

You can see this in 2006 tax revenue, today it is 2/3rds of 2006. Than
means your average business and personal income is less than 2/3rd in
real dollars over 2006. Hey, can't tax the 20% of real unemployed and
McJob replacements don't pay much taxes. But it is an Obamanation.

Spending, this too. If government can increase spending in one year by a
trillion, time to roll it back a trillion.

And by borrowing more with tax increases, many businesses are just going
to say f'k-it.


Did you even graduate from high school?

On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 19:59:39 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

On 7/11/11 7:56 PM, Canuck57 wrote:
On 11/07/2011 1:58 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/11/11 3:56 PM, Califbill wrote:

Reply:
Moron? We do not have a revenue problem, we have a spending problem!


GO talking points bull****. Nothing more.

And by borrowing more with tax increases, many businesses are just going
to say f'k-it.


Did you even graduate from high school?

it's amazing. EVERYTHING he says about economics is wrong. EVERYTHING.
christ he's ignorant