On 7/5/11 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:56:12 -0400,
wrote:

On 7/4/11 8:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:27:40 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:48:57 -0400,
wrote:

I suppose in what passes for your mind, you think those million
non-combatant asians deserved to die, and that we were justified in
invading vietnam, cambodia and thailand and waging war there.

Decisions that were initially made by well known liberal Democrat,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and further reinforced by another well known
Democrat named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

Or have you forgotten those facts?

I guess it seemed like a good idea at the time.

So much for your war mongering conservatives theory.

Quite frankly I can't see why you and Tim would even engage Krause in
such a conversation, knowing how he feels about military and honor..
Just sayin'..

The irony of our friend's holier than thou attitude was just a little
too rich to let it go.

Now he's blaming Eisenhower for Vietnam which is amusing to say the
least.


Really, W'hine? Where did I blame Eisenhower for the Vietnam debacle? I
did state the SEATO treaty later gave us an excuse for Vietnam, and that
that treaty came about mainly because of the efforts of the Eisenhower
administration. The key player was Dulles, Eisenhower's secretary of state.

That war was possibly the most shameful in U.S. history up to that point.

What I really find amusing is that Wayne and a couple others are very
quick to filter little ole me out, but they don't have any problem
sparing with you for years. I think they're threatened by me more than
by you. I wonder why?


I dunno. I long ago gave up wondering about what passes for thought in
the minds of conservatrash. It's enough that most of them are greedy,
selfish, and hate minorities, gays, women, et cetera.
--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

On Jul 5, 11:47*am, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:56:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:









On 7/4/11 8:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:27:40 -0400, I_am_Tosk
*wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:48:57 -0400,
wrote:

I suppose in what passes for your mind, you think those million
non-combatant asians deserved to die, and that we were justified in
invading vietnam, cambodia and thailand and waging war there.

Decisions that were initially made by well known liberal Democrat,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and further reinforced by another well known
Democrat named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

Or have you forgotten those facts?

I guess it seemed like a good idea at the time.

So much for your war mongering conservatives theory.

Quite frankly I can't see why you and Tim would even engage Krause in
such a conversation, knowing how he feels about military and honor..
Just sayin'..

The irony of our friend's holier than thou attitude was just a little
too rich to let it go.

Now he's blaming Eisenhower for Vietnam which is amusing to say the
least.

Really, W'hine? Where did I blame Eisenhower for the Vietnam debacle? I
did state the SEATO treaty later gave us an excuse for Vietnam, and that
that treaty came about mainly because of the efforts of the Eisenhower
administration. The key player was Dulles, Eisenhower's secretary of state.

That war was possibly the most shameful in U.S. history up to that point..

What I really find amusing is that Wayne and a couple others are very
quick to filter little ole me out, but they don't have any problem
sparing with you for years. I think they're threatened by me more than
by you. I wonder why?

Why?

Harry is not a parrot.

He actually has some sense, somewhere. He's just usually headed in the
wrong direction, and his blatant hypocrisy is remarkable - thus
earning remarks.

He is, however, easily ignorable. And again...

....Harry is not a parrot.

On 7/5/11 11:45 AM, John H wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 08:14:25 -0400, wrote:

On 7/5/11 8:08 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

On 7/3/11 6:09 PM, Jay wrote:
On 7/3/2011 5:46 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/3/11 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:30:17 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 3, 1:17 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:









On Jul 2, 9:37 am, Wayne wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,

wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical
technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life
expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and
women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with
unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look
quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of
those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding
citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault?
Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're
saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will
not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned
debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not
about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers
and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy
products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It
is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

Well, there we are. Proof positive that you're a hypocritical liar.
You've proved your a racist in other posts, but I was wondering how
long it would take to demonstrate your low-brow lying. You're really
working hard to move to the top of the idiot list, but Knuckles is
still king of the hill.

Well, I guess that didn't make you happy. At least it didn't hurt your
name calling. I suppose you're practicing right now.

(Note the correct usage of 'your' and 'you're'. You're starting to
sound like Loogy. He fixed his problem though.)

As I said, you're a liar. You've proved it over and over. Feel free to
correct everyone's typos if it makes you feel more a man.


Herring gave up his manhood when he participated in the murder of a
million innocent SE Asians during his term in uniform.



You went from boy to pussy when you made your life choices. You can't
take that back and do it over. Having to live your life as a sniveling
coward and suffering the ridicule is your reward. Enjoy

There's no honor in participating in the mass murder of innocents.

Mao
Stalin
Pol
Ho
Hussein
CUP
,
It's the countries that tolerate the mass murder as much as
whoever the leaders are at a particular time. You can add the United
States to that list.

How does it feel 'being involved' in the mass murder which you support?

JohnH, since you boat more this year than Don and I have boated in the
last 5 years, why don't you join our little group?

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

On 7/5/11 11:47 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:56:12 -0400,
wrote:

On 7/4/11 8:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:27:40 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:48:57 -0400,
wrote:

I suppose in what passes for your mind, you think those million
non-combatant asians deserved to die, and that we were justified in
invading vietnam, cambodia and thailand and waging war there.

Decisions that were initially made by well known liberal Democrat,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and further reinforced by another well known
Democrat named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

Or have you forgotten those facts?

I guess it seemed like a good idea at the time.

So much for your war mongering conservatives theory.

Quite frankly I can't see why you and Tim would even engage Krause in
such a conversation, knowing how he feels about military and honor..
Just sayin'..

The irony of our friend's holier than thou attitude was just a little
too rich to let it go.

Now he's blaming Eisenhower for Vietnam which is amusing to say the
least.


Really, W'hine? Where did I blame Eisenhower for the Vietnam debacle? I
did state the SEATO treaty later gave us an excuse for Vietnam, and that
that treaty came about mainly because of the efforts of the Eisenhower
administration. The key player was Dulles, Eisenhower's secretary of state.

That war was possibly the most shameful in U.S. history up to that point.

What I really find amusing is that Wayne and a couple others are very
quick to filter little ole me out, but they don't have any problem
sparing with you for years. I think they're threatened by me more than
by you. I wonder why?

It is obvious, you are more intelligent, and are a much better debater
than I am.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 10:36:59 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 29/06/2011 3:58 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:27:19 -0600,
wrote:

\\

sorry sport. the south aint democratic\

For once, for the most part your right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states

But if you look closely there is a pattern. More union, more up your
ass government, more dysfunctional the non-government economy, more
state taxes, more likely it is a fleabagger state.

we have no unions in the US. only well run, rich countries have unions

Actually not. But you go think so.

gee. germany exports more manufactured goods than the US does

union membership in the US 7%

german: 30%

populations; US 300M; germany: 82M

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:14:33 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article , naled24511
says...

On 7/4/11 3:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:15:59 -0400, wrote:

On 7/4/11 12:34 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jul 4, 11:01 am, wrote:
On 7/4/11 11:53 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jul 4, 8:25 am, wrote:
On 7/4/11 9:08 AM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:09:11 -0400, wrote:

On 7/3/2011 5:46 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/3/11 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:30:17 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 3, 1:17 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 2, 9:37 am, Wayne wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical
technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life
expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and
women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look
quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of
those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding
citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're
saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will
not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned
debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

Well, there we are. Proof positive that you're a hypocritical liar.
You've proved your a racist in other posts, but I was wondering how
long it would take to demonstrate your low-brow lying. You're really
working hard to move to the top of the idiot list, but Knuckles is
still king of the hill.

Well, I guess that didn't make you happy. At least it didn't hurt your
name calling. I suppose you're practicing right now.

(Note the correct usage of 'your' and 'you're'. You're starting to
sound like Loogy. He fixed his problem though.)

As I said, you're a liar. You've proved it over and over. Feel free to
correct everyone's typos if it makes you feel more a man.

Herring gave up his manhood when he participated in the murder of a
million innocent SE Asians during his term in uniform.

You went from boy to pussy when you made your life choices. You can't
take that back and do it over. Having to live your life as a sniveling
coward and suffering the ridicule is your reward. Enjoy

Harry persists in comparing me to John Kerry. Only I didn't lie about my service. And, Kerry was
Harry's hero.

Nice try at deflection, herring. My response was about you and your
participation in the war against the Vietnamese. If you were there, you
helped kill a million innocent Asians.

Sow as my 20 yr old cousin, yeah the baby butchering sob. But they got
back at him and that's why his name is on "The Wall" Paybacks are a
bugger.

You think the innocent non-combatant Asians had a hand in that? I wasn't
discussing the North Vietnam forces or the Viet Cong; I was talking
about the million non-combatant Asians who died as a result of the
moronic war we waged against Viet Nam.

I'm sure you are aware of the mid and late 20th century history of Viet
Nam and how it was **** upon by western powers and Japan. We had no
business waging our war against those people.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

I didn't say we did, but it's detestable to criticize those who
responded to their call of duty.

I really don't care what you say, anyone involved in Viet Nam in any
fashion is lower than dog ****, and is personally responsible for
killing over a million innocent people.

Including your hero, John Kerry?

A little hypocritical, Harry. Wouldn't you say?

Actually, you don't deserve a response, but I couldn't bypass your hypocrisy.

And once again you are responding to an ID spoofer.

Who cares if we respond to a spoofer. If it looks like a coward, posts
like a coward and hides behind lies like a coward it must be Harry
Krause.

So Harry's responsible for all the right wing spoofers???

Sure.

Um, you have not been here long enough to know any better, but yes, odds
are, Harry Krause is spoofing both the left and the right. History would
actually suggest he is playing both sides in many of these
"arguments"...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:30:55 -0700 (PDT), John H
wrote:

On Jul 5, 11:47*am, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:56:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:









On 7/4/11 8:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:27:40 -0400, I_am_Tosk
*wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:48:57 -0400,
wrote:

I suppose in what passes for your mind, you think those million
non-combatant asians deserved to die, and that we were justified in
invading vietnam, cambodia and thailand and waging war there.

Decisions that were initially made by well known liberal Democrat,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and further reinforced by another well known
Democrat named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

Or have you forgotten those facts?

I guess it seemed like a good idea at the time.

So much for your war mongering conservatives theory.

Quite frankly I can't see why you and Tim would even engage Krause in
such a conversation, knowing how he feels about military and honor..
Just sayin'..

The irony of our friend's holier than thou attitude was just a little
too rich to let it go.

Now he's blaming Eisenhower for Vietnam which is amusing to say the
least.

Really, W'hine? Where did I blame Eisenhower for the Vietnam debacle? I
did state the SEATO treaty later gave us an excuse for Vietnam, and that
that treaty came about mainly because of the efforts of the Eisenhower
administration. The key player was Dulles, Eisenhower's secretary of state.

That war was possibly the most shameful in U.S. history up to that point.

What I really find amusing is that Wayne and a couple others are very
quick to filter little ole me out, but they don't have any problem
sparing with you for years. I think they're threatened by me more than
by you. I wonder why?

Why?

Harry is not a parrot.

He actually has some sense, somewhere. He's just usually headed in the
wrong direction, and his blatant hypocrisy is remarkable - thus
earning remarks.

He is, however, easily ignorable. And again...

...Harry is not a parrot.

Yet, you can't ignore him or me for that matter. I think you're just a
small-minded guy with lots of time on his hands.

On 05/07/2011 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:30:55 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 5, 11:47 am, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:56:12 -0400,
wrote:









On 7/4/11 8:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:27:40 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:48:57 -0400,
wrote:

I suppose in what passes for your mind, you think those million
non-combatant asians deserved to die, and that we were justified in
invading vietnam, cambodia and thailand and waging war there.

Decisions that were initially made by well known liberal Democrat,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and further reinforced by another well known
Democrat named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

Or have you forgotten those facts?

I guess it seemed like a good idea at the time.

So much for your war mongering conservatives theory.

Quite frankly I can't see why you and Tim would even engage Krause in
such a conversation, knowing how he feels about military and honor..
Just sayin'..

The irony of our friend's holier than thou attitude was just a little
too rich to let it go.

Now he's blaming Eisenhower for Vietnam which is amusing to say the
least.

Really, W'hine? Where did I blame Eisenhower for the Vietnam debacle? I
did state the SEATO treaty later gave us an excuse for Vietnam, and that
that treaty came about mainly because of the efforts of the Eisenhower
administration. The key player was Dulles, Eisenhower's secretary of state.

That war was possibly the most shameful in U.S. history up to that point.

What I really find amusing is that Wayne and a couple others are very
quick to filter little ole me out, but they don't have any problem
sparing with you for years. I think they're threatened by me more than
by you. I wonder why?

Why?

Harry is not a parrot.

He actually has some sense, somewhere. He's just usually headed in the
wrong direction, and his blatant hypocrisy is remarkable - thus
earning remarks.

He is, however, easily ignorable. And again...

...Harry is not a parrot.

Yet, you can't ignore him or me for that matter. I think you're just a
small-minded guy with lots of time on his hands.

Agreed, harry is not a parrot, insults parrots.

Polly want a cracker?
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 21:41:16 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 05/07/2011 7:46 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 09:30:55 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 5, 11:47 am, wrote:
On Tue, 05 Jul 2011 06:56:12 -0400,
wrote:









On 7/4/11 8:43 PM, Wayne B wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jul 2011 20:27:40 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 12:48:57 -0400,
wrote:

I suppose in what passes for your mind, you think those million
non-combatant asians deserved to die, and that we were justified in
invading vietnam, cambodia and thailand and waging war there.

Decisions that were initially made by well known liberal Democrat,
John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and further reinforced by another well known
Democrat named Lyndon Baines Johnson.

Or have you forgotten those facts?

I guess it seemed like a good idea at the time.

So much for your war mongering conservatives theory.

Quite frankly I can't see why you and Tim would even engage Krause in
such a conversation, knowing how he feels about military and honor..
Just sayin'..

The irony of our friend's holier than thou attitude was just a little
too rich to let it go.

Now he's blaming Eisenhower for Vietnam which is amusing to say the
least.

Really, W'hine? Where did I blame Eisenhower for the Vietnam debacle? I
did state the SEATO treaty later gave us an excuse for Vietnam, and that
that treaty came about mainly because of the efforts of the Eisenhower
administration. The key player was Dulles, Eisenhower's secretary of state.

That war was possibly the most shameful in U.S. history up to that point.

What I really find amusing is that Wayne and a couple others are very
quick to filter little ole me out, but they don't have any problem
sparing with you for years. I think they're threatened by me more than
by you. I wonder why?

Why?

Harry is not a parrot.

He actually has some sense, somewhere. He's just usually headed in the
wrong direction, and his blatant hypocrisy is remarkable - thus
earning remarks.

He is, however, easily ignorable. And again...

...Harry is not a parrot.

Yet, you can't ignore him or me for that matter. I think you're just a
small-minded guy with lots of time on his hands.

Agreed, harry is not a parrot, insults parrots.

Polly want a cracker?

I get it. You're playing the keep-up-with-stupid game. The only
problem is that you're keeping up with yourself.

On 7/5/11 9:45 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

On Tue, 5 Jul 2011 08:14:33 -0400, wrote:

In articleSrqdncjybOD_ho_TnZ2dnUVZ_qGdnZ2d@earthlink .com, naled24511
@mypacks.net says...

On 7/4/11 3:30 PM, John H wrote:
On Mon, 04 Jul 2011 13:15:59 -0400, wrote:

On 7/4/11 12:34 PM, Tim wrote:
On Jul 4, 11:01 am, wrote:
On 7/4/11 11:53 AM, Tim wrote:









On Jul 4, 8:25 am, wrote:
On 7/4/11 9:08 AM, John H wrote:

On Sun, 03 Jul 2011 18:09:11 -0400, wrote:

On 7/3/2011 5:46 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/3/11 5:45 PM, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 13:30:17 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 3, 1:17 pm, wrote:
On Sun, 3 Jul 2011 05:27:38 -0700 (PDT), John
wrote:

On Jul 2, 9:37 am, Wayne wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog

wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical
technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life
expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and
women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look
quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of
those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding
citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're
saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will
not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned
debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

Wayne. Please stop calling Deplume 'D'Parrot'. Yes, I know, she
strongly resembles, with her behavior, a dimwitted African grey. But,
that is no excuse to participate in name-calling.

(There, deplume, does that make you happy?)

Well, there we are. Proof positive that you're a hypocritical liar.
You've proved your a racist in other posts, but I was wondering how
long it would take to demonstrate your low-brow lying. You're really
working hard to move to the top of the idiot list, but Knuckles is
still king of the hill.

Well, I guess that didn't make you happy. At least it didn't hurt your
name calling. I suppose you're practicing right now.

(Note the correct usage of 'your' and 'you're'. You're starting to
sound like Loogy. He fixed his problem though.)

As I said, you're a liar. You've proved it over and over. Feel free to
correct everyone's typos if it makes you feel more a man.

Herring gave up his manhood when he participated in the murder of a
million innocent SE Asians during his term in uniform.

You went from boy to pussy when you made your life choices. You can't
take that back and do it over. Having to live your life as a sniveling
coward and suffering the ridicule is your reward. Enjoy

Harry persists in comparing me to John Kerry. Only I didn't lie about my service. And, Kerry was
Harry's hero.

Nice try at deflection, herring. My response was about you and your
participation in the war against the Vietnamese. If you were there, you
helped kill a million innocent Asians.

Sow as my 20 yr old cousin, yeah the baby butchering sob. But they got
back at him and that's why his name is on "The Wall" Paybacks are a
bugger.

You think the innocent non-combatant Asians had a hand in that? I wasn't
discussing the North Vietnam forces or the Viet Cong; I was talking
about the million non-combatant Asians who died as a result of the
moronic war we waged against Viet Nam.

I'm sure you are aware of the mid and late 20th century history of Viet
Nam and how it was **** upon by western powers and Japan. We had no
business waging our war against those people.

--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

I didn't say we did, but it's detestable to criticize those who
responded to their call of duty.

I really don't care what you say, anyone involved in Viet Nam in any
fashion is lower than dog ****, and is personally responsible for
killing over a million innocent people.

Including your hero, John Kerry?

A little hypocritical, Harry. Wouldn't you say?

Actually, you don't deserve a response, but I couldn't bypass your hypocrisy.

And once again you are responding to an ID spoofer.

Who cares if we respond to a spoofer. If it looks like a coward, posts
like a coward and hides behind lies like a coward it must be Harry
Krause.

So Harry's responsible for all the right wing spoofers???

Sure.

Um, you have not been here long enough to know any better, but yes, odds
are, Harry Krause is spoofing both the left and the right. History would
actually suggest he is playing both sides in many of these
"arguments"...


I'm not spoofing anybody, ****-for-brains. This is just another of your
delusional fantasies about me. Since the posts of the ID spoofers read
at the same third grade level as most of your posts and those of your
reach-around buddy loogy, it is far more likely that you two are doing
the spoofing.



--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing