On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:


Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.


So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked?
Is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that
what you are saying?

So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry
cheap food, is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked
stores, is that what you are saying?

On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. *Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

On 7/2/2011 8:03 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 6:41 am, wrote:
On 7/2/2011 2:31 AM, wrote:

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

Read it again you dumb cluck.

D'Plume can read?

She sees words but her brain can't quite figure them out.

On 7/2/2011 8:14 AM, TopBassDog wrote:
On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:


Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.


So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked?
Is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that
what you are saying?

So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry
cheap food, is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked
stores, is that what you are saying?

Don't try to make sense of what she is saying. And never argue with her.
That is, if you want to maintain your sanity.

On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:


Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.


So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked?
Is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that
what you are saying?

So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry
cheap food, is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked
stores, is that what you are saying?

'Basically', I'm LMAO!

On 7/2/11 10:55 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT), wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:


Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.


So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked?
Is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that
what you are saying?

So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry
cheap food, is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked
stores, is that what you are saying?

'Basically', I'm LMAO!


Your lack of compassion for the poor is exceeded only by your
selfishness and racism.


--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

On 29/06/2011 3:58 AM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 21:27:19 -0600,
wrote:

On 28/06/2011 6:20 PM, wf3h wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.
\\

sorry sport. the south aint democratic\

For once, for the most part your right.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_states_and_blue_states

But if you look closely there is a pattern. More union, more up your
ass government, more dysfunctional the non-government economy, more
state taxes, more likely it is a fleabagger state.

we have no unions in the US. only well run, rich countries have unions

Actually not. But you go think so.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

On 02/07/2011 12:31 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400,
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No, you visit Amazon or some book store, instead of a lid of crack or
pot, you buy and read a book to better yourself. Take evening course
instead of looking for hookers....work out of your whiner dysfunctional
attitude and learn to think like a winner.

Work out of it. Like I did. I started out being one of 4 kids, wrong
side of the tracks, drugs in the hood and all. Now, I live in a
neighborhood with bankers, CEOs next door. Self made honestly all the
way, most even tax paid as I do use IRA/RRSP to shelter.

Trouble with you is your LAZY and truly stupid. Just an undiciplined
MFer looking to screw someone else.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

On 02/07/2011 9:05 AM, Harryk wrote:
On 7/2/11 10:55 AM, John H wrote:
On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 05:14:32 -0700 (PDT),
wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31 am, wrote:


Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.


So, if a store is local it has only cheap food and is poorly stocked?
Is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only found in poorly stocked, local stores. Is that
what you are saying?

So, Only the local stores are stocked poorly, and will only carry
cheap food, is that what you are saying?

So, cheap food is only affordable from the local, and poorly stocked
stores, is that what you are saying?

'Basically', I'm LMAO!


Your lack of compassion for the poor is exceeded only by your
selfishness and racism.

Always the pathetic harryk a slandering.


--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.
------
In Debt We Trust!
-- Obama and the democrats, world record in debt incursion.

On Sat, 02 Jul 2011 09:37:14 -0400, Wayne B
wrote:

On Sat, 2 Jul 2011 04:07:00 -0700 (PDT), TopBassDog
wrote:

On Jul 2, 1:31*am, wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 14:13:35 -0400, Wayne B

wrote:
On Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:58:12 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

No one doubts we have some of the most advanced medical technologies,
research, and facilities. But if you measure systems by life expectancy,
the United States, at 37th in the world for both men and women, is not
even close to having the best.

If you leave out the 20 to 30% of the US population with unhealthy
lifestyles (drugs, alcohol, violence, etc.), the numbers look quite
different. *Yes I know, it's really not fair to leave out all of those
democrats, but it is what it is.

So, if someone lives in a bad neighborhood, is a law-abiding citizen,
but is a victim of gun violence, it's that's person's fault? Or, if
all they can afford to buy is cheap food from the local, poorly
stocked store, it's their fault. Basically, that's what you're saying.

No D'Plume. It is all YOUR fault. YOUR fault for allowing the armed
person to prey on the law-abiding citizen due to economic strife or
what ever else you can blame on society to put the person into a
league of criminal activity due to desperate circumstances.

It is also YOUR fault that people can't control their poor eating
habits due to you not setting up education and health food services
for them. Not counting inviting them into your home and cooking for
them.

Poor D'Plume. You are a toad in society. You are not, and will not do
enough for the poor, helpless, and needy..

Trying to engage Ms. D'Parrot in an intelligent and reasoned debate is
an excercise in futility. Her mind is firmly made up and is not about
to be easily confused by the facts. That said, store owners in poor
neighborhoods, like store owners everywhere, know their customers and
stock what sells. If people are buying vegetables and dairy products,
they'll stock vegetables and dairy products. If people are buying
Hostess Twinkies and malt liquor, they'll stock that instead. It is a
tribute to our wonderfully enlightened policies that people can
actually use government food stamps to buy junk food, and it sells
very well.

So, basically you agree with your right-wing buddy's racist nonsense.
We get it Wayne. Now all we have to do is wait for John to tell you to
stop. I have a feeling it'll be a long wait, since he's a known liar.