In article ,
says...

In article ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?

Do you really have to ask that question. The national organization for
"liberal" women is a joke... Just like the ACLU.

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On 6/15/11 8:54 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?

Do you really have to ask that question. The national organization for
"liberal" women is a joke... Just like the ACLU.



As you are unaware of the purposes of either organization, it's no
surprise that this is yet another area of confusion for you.

You're really too ill-informed, ignorant and stupid to be commenting on
politics. Perhaps you ought to run for office in your local tea party.





--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

In article ,
says...

On 6/15/11 8:54 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?

Do you really have to ask that question. The national organization for
"liberal" women is a joke... Just like the ACLU.



As you are unaware of the purposes of either organization, it's no
surprise that this is yet another area of confusion for you.

You're really too ill-informed, ignorant and stupid to be commenting on
politics. Perhaps you ought to run for office in your local tea party.

Take your insulting and name calling to your own group.

On 6/15/11 8:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?


Because you are too intellectually lazy to find the answer to your own
questions about why neither Palin nor Bachmann would be supported by
NOW, here are the organization's positions:

NOW's Priority Issues

Constitutional Equality Amendment: Equality in pay, job opportunities,
political structure, social security and education will remain an
elusive dream without a guarantee of equality in the U.S. Constitution.
The progress we have made—and must continue to make—towards women's
equality can be lost at any time because those advances depend on
legislation that can be (and has been) weakened or repealed by Congress.
Although we did not succeed in ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment,
winning a constitutional guarantee of equality for women remains one of
NOW's top priorities. Not supported by Palin or Bachmann


Reproductive Rights: NOW affirms that reproductive rights are issues of
life and death for women, not mere matters of choice. NOW fully supports
access to safe and legal abortion, to effective birth control and
emergency contraception, to reproductive health services and education
for all women. We oppose attempts to restrict these rights through
legislation, regulation or Constitutional amendment. Opposed by Palin
and Bachmann

Racism: NOW condemns the racism that inflicts a double burden of race
and sex discrimination on women of color. Seeing human rights as
indivisible, we are committed to identifying and fighting against those
barriers to equality and justice that are imposed by racism. A leader in
the struggle for civil rights since its inception in 1966, NOW is
committed to diversifying our movement, and we continue to fight for
equal opportunities for women of color in all areas including
employment, education and reproductive rights.

Lesbian Rights: NOW is committed to fighting discrimination based on
sexual orientation or gender identity in all areas, including
employment, housing, public accommodations, health services, child
custody and military policies. NOW is committed to educational efforts
that combat the adverse effects of homophobia, promote positive images
in the media and ultimately ensure civil rights protection for all. NOW
asserts the right of lesbians to live their lives with dignity and
security, and the rights of equal marriage for all. Opposed by Palin and
Bachmann.

Violence Against Women: NOW is unique in its approach to the issue of
violence against women, emphasizing that there are many interrelated
aspects to the issue—domestic violence; sexual assault; sexual
harassment; violence at abortion clinics; hate crimes across lines of
gender, sexuality and race; the gender bias in our judicial system that
further victimizes survivors of violence; and the violence of poverty
emphasized by the radical right's attacks on poor women and children—all
of which result from society's attitudes toward women and efforts to
"keep women in their place." Opposed by Palin and Bachmann.

Economic Justice: NOW advocates for wide range of economic justice
issues affecting women, from the glass ceiling to the sticky floor of
poverty. These include welfare reform, livable wages, job
discrimination, pay equity, housing, social security and pension reform,
and much more. Opposed by Palin and Bachmann.



Why would NOW support either of these women when both are diametrically
opposed to its important positions?



--
Want to discuss recreational boating and fishing in a forum where
personal insults are not allowed?

http://groups.google.com/group/rec-boating-fishing

In article ,
says...

On 6/15/11 8:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?


Because you are too intellectually lazy to find the answer to your own
questions about why neither Palin nor Bachmann would be supported by
NOW, here are the organization's positions:

NOW's Priority Issues

Constitutional Equality Amendment: Equality in pay, job opportunities,
political structure, social security and education will remain an
elusive dream without a guarantee of equality in the U.S. Constitution.
The progress we have made?and must continue to make?towards women's
equality can be lost at any time because those advances depend on
legislation that can be (and has been) weakened or repealed by Congress.
Although we did not succeed in ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment,
winning a constitutional guarantee of equality for women remains one of
NOW's top priorities. Not supported by Palin or Bachmann


Reproductive Rights: NOW affirms that reproductive rights are issues of
life and death for women, not mere matters of choice. NOW fully supports
access to safe and legal abortion, to effective birth control and
emergency contraception, to reproductive health services and education
for all women. We oppose attempts to restrict these rights through
legislation, regulation or Constitutional amendment. Opposed by Palin
and Bachmann

Racism: NOW condemns the racism that inflicts a double burden of race
and sex discrimination on women of color. Seeing human rights as
indivisible, we are committed to identifying and fighting against those
barriers to equality and justice that are imposed by racism. A leader in
the struggle for civil rights since its inception in 1966, NOW is
committed to diversifying our movement, and we continue to fight for
equal opportunities for women of color in all areas including
employment, education and reproductive rights.

Lesbian Rights: NOW is committed to fighting discrimination based on
sexual orientation or gender identity in all areas, including
employment, housing, public accommodations, health services, child
custody and military policies. NOW is committed to educational efforts
that combat the adverse effects of homophobia, promote positive images
in the media and ultimately ensure civil rights protection for all. NOW
asserts the right of lesbians to live their lives with dignity and
security, and the rights of equal marriage for all. Opposed by Palin and
Bachmann.

Violence Against Women: NOW is unique in its approach to the issue of
violence against women, emphasizing that there are many interrelated
aspects to the issue?domestic violence; sexual assault; sexual
harassment; violence at abortion clinics; hate crimes across lines of
gender, sexuality and race; the gender bias in our judicial system that
further victimizes survivors of violence; and the violence of poverty
emphasized by the radical right's attacks on poor women and children?all
of which result from society's attitudes toward women and efforts to
"keep women in their place." Opposed by Palin and Bachmann.

Economic Justice: NOW advocates for wide range of economic justice
issues affecting women, from the glass ceiling to the sticky floor of
poverty. These include welfare reform, livable wages, job
discrimination, pay equity, housing, social security and pension reform,
and much more. Opposed by Palin and Bachmann.



Why would NOW support either of these women when both are diametrically
opposed to its important positions?

Take your political bull**** back to your own fantastic group asshole.

On 14/06/2011 3:32 PM, Harryk wrote:
On 6/14/11 4:57 PM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 16:31:54 -0400,
wrote:

On 6/14/11 4:19 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In article8ZCdne0OtIRSLmrQnZ2dnUVZ_gSdnZ2d@earthlink .com, payer33859
@mypacks.net says...

On 6/14/11 2:31 PM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...


Most of the right-wingers don't want to let women have access to
birth
control no less to abortion.

Where the hell did you hear that? It's total bullship! Most of the
conservatives I know are social liberals... Just not
"progressives" like
you.





You really ought to stay away from making politically oriented
posts...we already know you are a simple-minded fool; you're just
reinforcing it.

Most conservatives are not social liberals,


Harry, please learn to read.. I said most conservatives "I know".. you
dumbass.. thus, the rest of your tripe is worthless...

Most conservatives you know, eh? That must be some group.

I can just imagine... I wonder if it's the same group that brings guns
to town hall meetings?


Here's a thought...the people he knows who claim to be conservatives
aren't...they're just afraid if they tell Tosk they're moderates, he'll
firebomb their house.

Are you threatening Tosk by escalating to violence? Harryk, you should
be checked into a loonie bin.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 08:05:14 -0400, BAR wrote:

In article ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?

Why would you think it would be otherwise? Oh wait, we're supposed to
judge people just by their gender? I'm not allowed to disagree with
them because their women?

Or, are you just another right-wing asshole, looking for some way to
put people down.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 10:05:43 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

On 6/15/11 8:54 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In om,
says...

In ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?

Do you really have to ask that question. The national organization for
"liberal" women is a joke... Just like the ACLU.



As you are unaware of the purposes of either organization, it's no
surprise that this is yet another area of confusion for you.

You're really too ill-informed, ignorant and stupid to be commenting on
politics. Perhaps you ought to run for office in your local tea party.

He's a stalker/moron who thinks it makes him look smart to put down
women.

On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:42:32 -0400, Harryk
wrote:

On 6/15/11 8:05 AM, BAR wrote:
In ,
says...

Looks like she's going to announce "soon." I sure how Palin announces.
Then, we'll see just who is the craziest.

Doesn't Bachmann and Palin running say something good for the women's
movement? Wouldn't it be great for NOW to have a woman break through the
final glass ceiling?

Or, is NOW just another left leaning partisan group that only cares
about women who are of the correct political affiliation instead of
promoting women in general?


Because you are too intellectually lazy to find the answer to your own
questions about why neither Palin nor Bachmann would be supported by
NOW, here are the organization's positions:

NOW's Priority Issues

Constitutional Equality Amendment: Equality in pay, job opportunities,
political structure, social security and education will remain an
elusive dream without a guarantee of equality in the U.S. Constitution.
The progress we have made—and must continue to make—towards women's
equality can be lost at any time because those advances depend on
legislation that can be (and has been) weakened or repealed by Congress.
Although we did not succeed in ratifying the Equal Rights Amendment,
winning a constitutional guarantee of equality for women remains one of
NOW's top priorities. Not supported by Palin or Bachmann


Reproductive Rights: NOW affirms that reproductive rights are issues of
life and death for women, not mere matters of choice. NOW fully supports
access to safe and legal abortion, to effective birth control and
emergency contraception, to reproductive health services and education
for all women. We oppose attempts to restrict these rights through
legislation, regulation or Constitutional amendment. Opposed by Palin
and Bachmann

Racism: NOW condemns the racism that inflicts a double burden of race
and sex discrimination on women of color. Seeing human rights as
indivisible, we are committed to identifying and fighting against those
barriers to equality and justice that are imposed by racism. A leader in
the struggle for civil rights since its inception in 1966, NOW is
committed to diversifying our movement, and we continue to fight for
equal opportunities for women of color in all areas including
employment, education and reproductive rights.

Lesbian Rights: NOW is committed to fighting discrimination based on
sexual orientation or gender identity in all areas, including
employment, housing, public accommodations, health services, child
custody and military policies. NOW is committed to educational efforts
that combat the adverse effects of homophobia, promote positive images
in the media and ultimately ensure civil rights protection for all. NOW
asserts the right of lesbians to live their lives with dignity and
security, and the rights of equal marriage for all. Opposed by Palin and
Bachmann.

Violence Against Women: NOW is unique in its approach to the issue of
violence against women, emphasizing that there are many interrelated
aspects to the issue—domestic violence; sexual assault; sexual
harassment; violence at abortion clinics; hate crimes across lines of
gender, sexuality and race; the gender bias in our judicial system that
further victimizes survivors of violence; and the violence of poverty
emphasized by the radical right's attacks on poor women and children—all
of which result from society's attitudes toward women and efforts to
"keep women in their place." Opposed by Palin and Bachmann.

Economic Justice: NOW advocates for wide range of economic justice
issues affecting women, from the glass ceiling to the sticky floor of
poverty. These include welfare reform, livable wages, job
discrimination, pay equity, housing, social security and pension reform,
and much more. Opposed by Palin and Bachmann.



Why would NOW support either of these women when both are diametrically
opposed to its important positions?

All true, but I do think it is good that they're out there and able to
do what they're doing, even if I vehemently disagree with their
positions.

On 15/06/2011 10:42 AM, Harryk wrote nonsense...

Hey harryk, with your slander and bashing of Palin, your a woman hater.

We all know liberal fleabaggers would also like to manage womens
pussies. A real problem today be it right or left, is the insatiable
need to needlessly control others. Using a womans pussy as a political
issue with all the more important issues out there is a sign of debtors
denial, myopic and mindless deflection from the real issues.

USA is like the Titanic, once thought unsinkable. Here you liberal
fleabaggers and right religious zealots are worried about a womans pussy
while the holds fill up with cold debt waters. Yep, the ship is sinking
and all you nosy, noisy pathetic people can think about are laws on a
woman's pussy.

Pathetic. When gasoline is $100 a gallon because the USD isn't worth
crap, well, then you can still talk pussy. Real men don't try to bully
women. Maybe if we had 80% women in government, maybe they can tell us
men how to use our cocks.

What a dumb argument. A nation of stupid fools.

You should be hammering questions like "Why hasn't $4 trillion shown any
results?" "Are we going to avoid Einstein's definition of insanity and
get some real changes as clearly debt-bailout-spend is not working?".

Hey, women might have more kids and fewer abortions if the families of
America had more income, less taxes, a more stable economy, better jobs,
good education....

Don't get distracted from the real issues. Government/Bank corrupt
economics is the only issue the people should be worried about this
election. Your economic viability depends on it.

--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.