In article ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:58:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

On 12/06/2011 10:51 AM, I_am_Tosk wrote:
In ,
says...

Where are the terrorists in Afghanistan?

Oh they are in Pakistan.

I doubt he is honest or smart enough to understand the question. He will
just call you a racist.

dont know much about afghan/pakistan relations

and i notice neither of you told us where the WMD's were

We are waiting for Hillary to tell us...

15 of the 9/11 were Saudi, and Hillary has close Saudi raised advisor
and connections. Including the wife of the democrat that likes to email
his cock around.

It is so Hillaryious.

gee. this has zip to do with iraq

notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:30:29 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:58:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

It is so Hillaryious.

gee. this has zip to do with iraq

notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:30:29 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:58:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

It is so Hillaryious.

gee. this has zip to do with iraq

notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:30:29 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In article ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:58:53 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:

It is so Hillaryious.

gee. this has zip to do with iraq

notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

That's not completely accurate, as you know. And, it's working out
better than the neglect that took place leading to Bush/Paulson
initiating TARP.

On 14/06/2011 11:06 AM, wrote:
On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 17:30:29 -0400, I_am_Tosk
wrote:

In ,
says...

On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 11:58:53 -0600,
wrote:

It is so Hillaryious.

gee. this has zip to do with iraq

notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

That's not completely accurate, as you know. And, it's working out
better than the neglect that took place leading to Bush/Paulson
initiating TARP.

Does not mater if it is Democrats pushing Bush or Obamanomics
corruption, more government is more problems.

So stop the insanity and vote for less government. Doing the same old
debt-corruption spend Obamanomics isn't working. Or in at least not for
99% of the people.

Hey, voting Obama was a mistake, but show your smart and dump him in 2012.
--
Government isn't the solution to the bad economy, it is the problem.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 15:52:38 -0600, Canuck57
wrote:


Does not mater if it is Democrats pushing Bush or Obamanomics
corruption, more government is more problems.

So stop the insanity and vote for less government.

we did have less govt. that's where CSE's come in.

how'd that work out or the economy?


Hey, voting Obama was a mistake, but show your smart and dump him in 2012.

yeah let's go with bachman

let's turn the entire US into a slave state for america's corporations

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wf3h wrote:


notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars
?
reallly? bush drew down iraq to 50k? withdrew troops from afghanistan?

were these the famous invisible troops?


, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

the bailouts. for anyone who ever took economics, were necessary
because of the too big to fail problem. the right structured the
economy so that there is socialism for the rich and capitalism for the
middle class

the right ignores this, though. there's even a name for it: moral
hazard theory. but the right ignores THAT.

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:46:48 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars
?
reallly? bush drew down iraq to 50k? withdrew troops from afghanistan?

were these the famous invisible troops?

The current plan was the Bush plan.
The dates just slipped a bit since Obama took office

now let's see.

the current eonomic situation was bush's

but it's obama's fault

the current drawdown in iraq is being done by obama

but bush gets the credit

gee. why is anyone surprised when the racism of the right is exposed?


the bailouts. for anyone who ever took economics, were necessary
because of the too big to fail problem. the right structured the
economy so that there is socialism for the rich and capitalism for the
middle class


I don't understand why you think giving over a trillion dollars to the
same people who caused the crash with no strings attached was the
right thing to do. I suppose it is because Obama told you so.

HAHAHAH you ever hear of the 29 depression? ever take a course in
economics?

the problem with the right is they want this to CONTINUE. you're kinda
stupiid and dont know much history so fall right into their trap

In article ,
says...

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 18:40:32 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 10:56:39 -0400, wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 05:51:46 -0400, wf3h wrote:

On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 00:41:44 -0400, wrote:

On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:56:18 -0400, wf3h wrote:


notice how desperately the right fights any responsibility of bush in
the trillion dollar disaster of iraq?

Yeah, yeah, yeah... Isn't that why you elected the dumb ****? It's his
war now, he promised to end it and lied, now it's on him...

never voted for bush. sorry.

I am sure you voted for the 5th Bush brother.

as well as the 12th imam in your imagination


Nope, just the Bush reference. Obama is following the Bush roadmap in
the wars
?
reallly? bush drew down iraq to 50k? withdrew troops from afghanistan?

were these the famous invisible troops?

The current plan was the Bush plan.
The dates just slipped a bit since Obama took office


, the bailouts and he still has most of the same fiscal team
doing the same basic plan for the recovery. Basically they have just
thrown money at the top guys in that Wall Street/Bankster cabal and
waited for it to trickle down.
How is that working for you?

the bailouts. for anyone who ever took economics, were necessary
because of the too big to fail problem. the right structured the
economy so that there is socialism for the rich and capitalism for the
middle class


I don't understand why you think giving over a trillion dollars to the
same people who caused the crash with no strings attached was the
right thing to do. I suppose it is because Obama told you so.
It is interesting that he changed everything he believed in 2007, as
soon as the big money bribes got to him.
That was when he became the 5th Bush brother.

Bought and paid for...

--
Team Rowdy Mouse, Banned from the Mall for life!