bpuharic wrote:

not a single econonist agrees with that.

You're full of ****.

most estimate it created
about 1.5M jobs

That comes out to $533,333.33 per job.

We're talking about $800 billion. It was enough
money to give 16 million people $50 thousand.

So, according to you, Obama spent $533,333.33 for
every ONE job that he created.

As far as failures go, we're talking BIBLICAL in
scope.

"JTEM" wrote in message
...

bpuharic wrote:

not a single econonist agrees with that.

You're full of ****.

most estimate it created
about 1.5M jobs

That comes out to $533,333.33 per job.

We're talking about $800 billion. It was enough
money to give 16 million people $50 thousand.

So, according to you, Obama spent $533,333.33 for
every ONE job that he created.

As far as failures go, we're talking BIBLICAL in
scope.



This is a false argument. Firstly, the Stim wasn't about job creation as the
primary focus. Perhaps it should have been, but it wasn't.

TARP: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trouble...Relief_Program

Stim:
http://topics.nytimes.com/top/refere...lus/index.html

--
Nom=de=Plume

On Mon, 22 Feb 2010 21:10:35 -0800 (PST), JTEM
wrote:


bpuharic wrote:

not a single econonist agrees with that.

You're full of ****.

well there's a well argued position


most estimate it created
about 1.5M jobs

That comes out to $533,333.33 per job.

actually about 70K


We're talking about $800 billion. It was enough
money to give 16 million people $50 thousand.

and it did things other than give jobs

So, according to you, Obama spent $533,333.33 for
every ONE job that he created.

As far as failures go, we're talking BIBLICAL in
scope.

if that was the cause, george bush would still be in office

he's evidence of a biblical flood of incompetence

JTEM wrote:
bpuharic wrote:

not a single econonist agrees with that.

You're full of ****.

most estimate it created
about 1.5M jobs

That comes out to $533,333.33 per job.

We're talking about $800 billion. It was enough
money to give 16 million people $50 thousand.

So, according to you, Obama spent $533,333.33 for
every ONE job that he created.

As far as failures go, we're talking BIBLICAL in
scope.

Heh, more conserva-trash show up while I feeesh in beautiful Costa Rica.
Feeeshing is good, and babe-watching even better.
To JTEM the moron:
1/3 of the stim went to tax cuts dufus.
And another third hasn't even been spent.
Using a calculator to divide a number - start with the right number.
Don't ask herring for it. That racist doesn't have it.
Ever have fish tacos?
Deeeeeleeecious.
And for your edification, not that it matters to me of course,
you conserva-trash have been responding to a spoofer.
Idiots.

"nom=de=plume" wrote:

"JTEM" wrote in message

We're talking about $800 billion. It was enough
money to give 16 million people $50 thousand.

So, according to you, Obama spent $533,333.33 for
every ONE job that he created.

As far as failures go, we're talking BIBLICAL in
scope.

This is a false argument.

No it isn't.

Firstly, the Stim wasn't about job creation as the
primary focus.

By definition, that is what a "Stimulus Package" is.

But, even if you want to pretend otherwise, you're
not contradicting me. Bush blew $700 billion, Obama
blew $800 billion and neither gave a **** about the
little guy. It really was Bucks-for-Billionaires.

H the K wrote:

1/3 of the stim went to tax cuts dufus.

One quarter of Obumholes package, which was
the second package -- or $200 billion.

That leaves $1.3 trillion in cash.

That's obscene, you worthless retard, and that's
WITHOUT taking into account how all the REAL
Democrats howled when Bush passed a $100 billion
tax cut his first year.

Bush called Republican == $100 billion tax cut

Obumhole ironically called Democrat == $200 billion

And another third hasn't even been spent.

Well the grand total was $1.5 trillion. So you're
saying that they only spent $1 trillion?

Seriously, you're an idiot. These numbers here aren't
just huge, they're staggering in size, and the return
has been PATHETIC.

Pretend that you've got some balls, that you're not
as big a pussy as the average Bushbot was, and admit
failure. Obumhole has failed, just like Dubya failed,
so stop being a pussy and admit it.

JTEM wrote:
H the K wrote:


Seriously, you're an idiot. These numbers here aren't
just huge, they're staggering in size, and the return
has been PATHETIC.


Quit whining, you squeaky schitt. If you can't afford America, leave.
We don't need deadbeats. Plenty of cheap places for you.
Costa Rica is affordable, has good fishing, scenery, rum, and babes.
Try it out, dummkopf. And don't come back.

Pretend that you've got some balls, that you're not
as big a pussy as the average Bushbot was, and admit
failure. Obumhole has failed, just like Dubya failed,
so stop being a pussy and admit it.


What makes you think I give a schitt about your uneducated mewlings?
Go soak your head. Preferably as far away from me as possible.
Idiot.

On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:37:10 -0800 (PST), JTEM
wrote:


H the K wrote:

1/3 of the stim went to tax cuts dufus.

One quarter of Obumholes package, which was
the second package -- or $200 billion.

That leaves $1.3 trillion in cash.

That's obscene, you worthless retard, and that's
WITHOUT taking into account how all the REAL
Democrats howled when Bush passed a $100 billion
tax cut his first year.


now let's see....bush cuts taxes on the rich

all of a sudden we dont have enough to pay our bills

he then blames it on obama.

gee. you can't accuse right wingers of overthinking the issue

Bush called Republican == $100 billion tax cut

Obumhole ironically called Democrat == $200 billion

And another third hasn't even been spent.

Well the grand total was $1.5 trillion. So you're
saying that they only spent $1 trillion?

guess he forgot the $1T bush poured into iraq

"JTEM" wrote in message
...

"nom=de=plume" wrote:

"JTEM" wrote in message

We're talking about $800 billion. It was enough
money to give 16 million people $50 thousand.

So, according to you, Obama spent $533,333.33 for
every ONE job that he created.

As far as failures go, we're talking BIBLICAL in
scope.

This is a false argument.

No it isn't.

Firstly, the Stim wasn't about job creation as the
primary focus.

By definition, that is what a "Stimulus Package" is.

But, even if you want to pretend otherwise, you're
not contradicting me. Bush blew $700 billion, Obama
blew $800 billion and neither gave a **** about the
little guy. It really was Bucks-for-Billionaires.



Neither "blew" either, certainly not in their entirety .. neither was
perfect, but both had results.

--
Nom=de=Plume

HK wrote:
JTEM wrote:
H the K wrote:


Seriously, you're an idiot. These numbers here aren't
just huge, they're staggering in size, and the return
has been PATHETIC.


Quit whining, you squeaky schitt. If you can't afford America, leave.
We don't need deadbeats. Plenty of cheap places for you.
Costa Rica is affordable, has good fishing, scenery, rum, and babes.
Try it out, dummkopf. And don't come back.

Pretend that you've got some balls, that you're not
as big a pussy as the average Bushbot was, and admit
failure. Obumhole has failed, just like Dubya failed,
so stop being a pussy and admit it.


What makes you think I give a schitt about your uneducated mewlings?
Go soak your head. Preferably as far away from me as possible.
Idiot.

No facts. No answer to the question. Just insults.

Lib - When Jack Webb said "Just the facts, Ma'am" they were sleeping.